In China, a nation that has endured 5,000 years of war, there is a kind of thinking called "preemptive strike" or "prudent war", which is not new. However, when the military also began to promote this kind of thinking, it caused anger and incomprehension. The military as the sovereignty and interests of the stateDefenders, should be rational and not emotional, in the face of the enemy's provocation and aggression should not hesitate to fight back, and should not add too many preconditions to themselves. However, in reality, some military personnel advocate "not firing the first shot" and even advocate cautious warfare, which is worrying. This article will analyze why later innocent statements can attract outrage and analyze them from the perspective of rational polemics.
Why did the idea of innocence cause outrage among some soldiers?The reasons for this can be explained in the following ways.
First of all, the thinking of guilt-free after the onset is considered a sign of timidity and weakness. As the sword of the country, the responsibility of the army lies in defending the interests of the people and the people, not prevarication and evasion. The assertion of innocence hinted at the hesitation and passivity of the soldiers in dealing with the battle, which contrasted sharply with the bravery and decisiveness of the soldiers, and thus provoked the anger of the people.
Second, the idea of innocence is considered a sign of irresponsibility. as a stateDefenders, military personnel need to respond to the enemy's provocations and aggression with firm will and effectiveness. If a soldier advocates "not firing the first shot," it is tantamount to putting the interests of the country and the people at risk, and this kind of evasion of responsibility is unacceptable.
In addition, the thinking of late innocence was considered a departure from the spirit of a fighting nation. In the history of China, there has always been a brave and fearless fighting national spirit, and our ancestors have always been models of courageous struggle without fear of strong enemies. And in today's world, war still exists, and we can't expect to influence other ** forces through reason and love. On the contrary, it is only through resolute armed action that the enemy can feel our deterrence and determination, so as to safeguard the dignity of the country and the interests of the nation.
Therefore, when some military personnel put forward the idea of innocence after attack, this is not only a manifestation of a lack of courage and a sense of responsibility, but also an act that deviates from the spirit of the fighting nation, thus arousing strong anger and dissatisfaction among the masses of the people.
However, in dealing with the rhetoric of military personnel, we should also reflect on our understanding of rational polemics. Rational polemics are not a passive and weak attitude, but a comprehensive, objective and calm way of thinking. In modern warfare, relying solely on force to solve problems can no longer fully adapt to the complex and ever-changing international situation, and rational debate has also become an important means to enhance national strength and safeguard national interests.
Rational polemics are not only about systematically putting forward one's own views and propositions, but more importantly, analyzing and evaluating problems with an objective and scientific attitude and looking for reasonable solutions. It focuses on the use of diplomacy and international debate and support to achieve the goal of safeguarding national interests and promoting peaceful development. The significance of rational debate lies in avoiding unnecessary conflicts and wars and achieving the goal of peace and stability through a contest of thinking and wisdom.
The duty of servicemen is to defend the interests of the people and the people, and their actions should be based on the interests of the country and aimed at the realization of the will of the country. Although rational debates have their importance, the first thing that military personnel should maintain is firm determination and courage, and they must not lose due decisiveness and resoluteness because of excessive emphasis on rationality.
First of all, soldiers need to have a firm fighting spirit and the will to defeat the enemy. They must have the courage to overcome all challenges and enemies, and be indestructible in the face of all kinds of evil forces. Only with firm determination can we stand up and defend the interests of the country and the people at a critical moment.
Secondly, military personnel need to haveJudgmentand the ability to think independently. There is no absolute black and white in the world, and military personnel need to be able to judge the situation objectively and calmly, interpret information, and make correct decisions. At the same time, they also need to have the ability to think independently, not be affected by external voices, and always maintain their own positions and principles.
Finally, military personnel need to keep pace with the times and constantly improve their own quality and combat effectiveness. In today's world,TechnologyThe progress of the armed forces and the changes in the pattern of warfare have brought new challenges and opportunities to the armed forces. Military personnel should actively study and study new onesequipment and combat techniques, improve their combat capabilities, maintain absolute deterrence against the enemy.
Summarizing the above points, we can see that the idea of latecomer innocence is controversial in the military because it is seen as a sign of cowardice, irresponsibility and departure from the fighting national spirit. However, rational debate is also an important way of thinking that can help the military find reasonable solutions and safeguard national interests. Military personnel should maintain firm determination and courage to haveJudgmentand the ability to think independently, and keep pace with the times, and constantly improve their own quality and combat effectiveness. In the process of realizing the will of the state and safeguarding the interests of the state, servicemen should be calm and decisive and always maintain a deterrent to the enemy in order to defend the security and interests of the country and the people.
Note: The views used in this article are those of the authorSilent nightThe personal understanding and expression of history is not an objective fact or an authoritative point of view.