Zhang Jie smeared Wen Tiejun and was angrily reprimanded by Sima Nan, and the Lenovo duo turned against him, who do you support?
Zhang Jie, Sima Nan, Sima Nan and Zhang Jie"Lenovo"The turbulent and sincere duo has attracted countless popularity and popularity, and has changed from a second-tier Internet celebrity"Top traffic", and each has a lot of fans, among which Sima Nan and Zhang Jie have received more than 30 million attention respectively. Sima Nan has more than 30 million followers on the Internet, and Zhang Jie also has more than 10 million followers.
Zhang Jie launched an attack on Teacher Wen Tiejun.
However, Sima Nan and Zhang Jie disagreed on Professor Wen Tiejun's views. Zhang Jie has repeatedly criticized and criticized Wen Tiejun in different places, but Sima Nan admires Wen Tiejun very much, and has praised Wen Tiejun's knowledge and insights several times in his videos.
Sima Nan's strong support for Wen Tiejun.
Therefore, when Zhang Jie and others insulted Wen Tiejun, Sima Nan couldn't hold back anymore, and he said loudly:"The whole village was shouting, and Wen Tiejun, the three of us from the Agricultural University, had been torn to pieces.
Sima Nan reprimanded Zhang Jie as"Barking dogs", he said"It's just a dog that bites.
Sima Nan did not choose Zhang Jie, but chose Wen Tiejun, which was something that no one expected. So, is Zhang Jie right or Wen Tiejun right?
Wen Tiejun's Ph.D.**Introduction.
First of all, we must figure out a question, that is, whether Zhang Jie is more familiar with the countryside or Wen Tiejun is more knowledgeable?One of the easiest and most productive ways is to see how many times their article has been cited. What is the reference number?That is, when a person writes an article and publishes it in a famous magazine, he will use the arguments in the article to prove his arguments. Comparing the ** of Wen Tiejun and Zhang Jie, it can be seen that there is a big difference between the two. Mr. Wen Tiejun's articles have been cited a lot, which is recognized by the academic community, and Zhang Jie is not only a small number, but only a few"Hydrological works"That's it, the number of citations is even smaller, almost all of them are 0 or a pitifully low number, which is mainly due to the fact that Zhang Jie's articles have no reference value at all, and no one will refer to them at all.
Comparison between Zhang Jie's writings and Mr. Wen Tiejun's.
It can be seen from the works of Zhang Jie and Wen Tiejun that Zhang Jie has written "Credit War", "Life Potential", "Magic Book", and Wen Tiejun. To tell the truth, compared with Dr. Wen Tiejun, Zhang Jie is still far behind. Through the comparison of the works, it can be found that Zhang Jie's works are actually "text watercolors". Here"Sputtering"What does that mean exactly?In other words, these articles are the author's own opinions, without any evidence, nor any theoretical support, in fact, these are some "chicken soup" with no substantive value, which is very similar to what Zhang Jie is doing now. Dr. Wen Tiejun's main research is on agriculture, and there are few other things that have nothing to do with it.
Zhang Jie's ** on the content of pork.
Let's take a look at Zhang Jie's criticism of Teacher Wen Tiejun and analyze them one by one.
First of all, in China, there is a discussion about the demand for pork. Based on empirical research, Professor Wen Tiejun proposed that there are 70 million pigs surplus in China every year, and Zhang Jie said"Seventy million pigs, one and a half, fifty to one hundred kilograms a year, about 75% of people, two catties a day. ""He should have understood the data, and he would have understood how hateful those three masters of agronomy were!""He should have known the data, and he would have understood how abominable those three agronomists were!""He should have known the data, and he would have understood how hateful those three farmers were!""He should have known the data, and he would have understood how hateful those three farmers were!"He has to know all the data so you can see how abominable those three agronomists are!"
Will Zhang Jie's fans think he is right?Zhang Jie has never seriously researched or understood the real state of the economy, so he has only adopted an unspoken average level. Zhang Jie's fans have no ability to distinguish, they actually think that such a result is reasonable.
Let's take a look at the relevant figures released by the National Bureau of Statistics: in 2020, China's per capita pork consumption was 182 kg, down 2 percent year-on-year1 kg;19 kg in urban and rural areas, down 1. year-on-year3 kg, 17 in the countryside1 kg, down 31 kg;
This figure also proves that Professor Wen Tiejun's point of producing up to 700 million pigs a year is correct, and as pig production continues to rise, the supply of pigs will increase. From here we can also see the danger that Zhang Jie is facing - if he were to produce according to his "law of average", it would be a great disaster.
Zhang Jie attacked Professor Wen Tiejun for no reason.
Secondly, Wen Tiejun was called the "Ford Scholarship" by Zhang Jie. So, what exactly is the truth?
Reality. It is obvious that Zhang Jie has practiced the skill of "picking and choosing" to the point of reaching the peak. This is clearly a formal cooperation plan, but Zhang Jie distorts this matter into a private act of Dr. Wen Tiejun. In fact, those news belong to public news, as long as people with a little common sense can search for it, and then reply accordingly, it's a pity that Zhang Jie's brainless fans don't think about it for themselves at all, they really believe what Zhang Jie said, and they also attacked Dr. Wen Tiejun on the Internet.
Zhang Jie misinterpreted Wen Tiejun's agricultural problems in East Asia.
Clause. 3. Wen Tiejun's combination of East Asia's agricultural development style with Japan's cooperation style triggered Zhang Jie's attack on Wen Tiejun and called him"Love Day"。But in fact, Wen Tiejun wrote in "Don't Forget the Original Intention - Wen Tiejun Talks"Three rural"Problems" is clearly stated:"In China, developed countries subsidize agricultural products, but Japan has only more than 5.58 million peasant households, while China has more than 80 million peasant households"Jing Ri"What can it be?What is"Jing Ri"？
Wen Tiejun only briefly described the farming methods of various countries, commented on them, and pointed out that the beneficial points are worth learning, but they cannot be directly applied due to the limitations of the objective environment. Isn't this just ordinary investigation and debate?And Zhang Jie grasped this point and attacked Wen Tiejun"Overheating"There was another critique, which is hard to believe.
Zhang Jie's misinterpretation of the three agricultural models proposed by Wen Tiejun et al.
Fourth, Wen Tiejun and others about"Three rural models"and Zhang Jie"Farming model"Both theories have their own characteristics. This time, Zhang Jie also called Wen Tiejun's teacher"Capitalist roaders"In fact, what Wen Tiejun advocated"Three rural models", in fact, it is the three rural areas, and for"Farming model", Wen Tiejun never raised any objections. On the contrary, it was Zhang Jie himself, who called Wen Tiejun as"Farming model"of the opposition.
And Zhang Jie is right"Agricultural construction model"It also shows its non-professional attitude towards agriculture. Zhang Jie about"State-owned capital"To take"Agricultural construction model"to supplement the claims of the countryside, apparently, is only an illusion. China's rural regions have different geographical locations and diverse geographical locations, as well as complex industrial chains, which have led to different types of agriculture. to"National capital"for the power of the people"Farming model"Because of the complexity of the objective situation, it is just an illusion.
If desired"National capital"Everything, so how do you configure it in terms of producers, transportation and marketing, and business models?Zhang Jie used"National capital"to carry out"Agricultural products** way"This is a completely uninvestigated and verified plan, completely without any feasibility, and completely a whimsical idea. In stark contrast, what Wen Tiejun said, it is obviously a more feasible way to establish an agricultural team funded by the state to invest and cultivate, and to allocate and allocate funds appropriately according to local conditions.
Zhang Jie (Zhang Jie).
Obviously, Wen Tiejun is an expert with in-depth knowledge and research on agriculture and agricultural issues, but Zhang Jie only knows some scratches, he uses Wen Tiejun's theory to criticize, and because Zhang Jie's knowledge is insufficient, he can only use this method to refute Wen Tiejun, he thinks Wen Tiejun got one"Ford**"of"Non-** organizations"It's a shame to help. Ford** provided funding", Accept"Non-** organizations"This in itself is an unreasonable act, and an attempt to use Wen Tiejun's views to carry out a personal attack is itself a very despicable act.
Zhang Jie's resume.
And in the squad behind him, it was a member of Zhang Jie's small group. called"One course with three bachelors"Zhang Jie, no matter what field he is engaged in, is blank from the resume. He has only been working at the Institute of High Energy Physics for six months, and he is already the director and chief engineer, and the promotion of this position also shows the profound background of his three "three academies outside the gate".He then worked as a systems analyst, general manager, then as a lawyer, then as a director and general manager for several companies, and finally as a media. The media. To put it small, it is to engage in multiple real estate projects, and to put it big, it is just like that.
Mr. Zhang has also previously slammed Mr. Ma and others.
Everyone knows that everyone's time and energy have a limit, and it is even more impossible for someone like Zhang Jie. First of all, in response to the criticism of Ali and Jack Ma, there is "Ali is just a well-packaged Japanese company";Subsequently, he also followed Sima Nan's example and conducted 72 association questions on Lenovo. Then they lashed out at the Western system, claiming that the eyes of the West were unscientific and premeditated. He also talked about the real estate industry, denounced the disappearance of property tax, and hyped that real estate will continue to riseWave Theory;In the real estate sector, the property tax has been slammed and the hype has been made that it will continue to riseIn the end, he pointed the finger at the field of agriculture and fisheries, criticized Professor Wen Tiejun, and criticized Professor Wen for not having him"Professional"。
Wen Tiejun. How is Mr. Wen?Mr. Wen is only concerned about the three rural issues, and all the contents he publishes are about farmers and agriculture. Compared to the two, nature is a better understanding of agriculture and agriculture. In fact, Zhang Jie seems to know everything and knows everything, but she is just a superficial ordinary person, and once she meets a professional, she will be revealed. Otherwise, such a proficient in everything"All-rounder", how do you want to shine in the end in terms of expressing yourself?Isn't that a tyrannical thing?
Zhang Jie's behind-the-scenes production team.
The reason why Zhang Jie was able to achieve so much was that in addition to his three professors, there was also the strong support of Rao Zixuan and his team, the reason why Zhang Jie was able to gain so much attention in such a short period of time is because of his increasing popularity, so he is now an online player"Big V!"However, we also have to think about these so-called"Big V!"Do you really know everything like "self is king"?
Zhang Jie's brain-dead fans bombarded Wen Tiejun.
Zhang Jie, who has the attention of tens of millions of netizens"King of Knowledge", becoming his accomplice in cyberbullying Dr. Wen Tiejun. Those even"Three rural"Fans who don't understand the problem actually talk about it as if they were playing"Teacher Zhang Jie is right"、"I support Mr. Zhang"Here comes the stuff.
Sima Nan. Now Sima Nan is due to Zhang Jie"Clamor"And scolded, this is the exactly"Turn the other cheek", or one planned by Rao Chuan's team behind the scenes"Farce"The purpose is to create more **, so that you can get more attention, so as to gain more popularity, so that you can continue to make money. With popularity, with popularity, he can continue to make money. In fact, judging from the news revealed by Li Su, another well-known person in Rao Chuan's team, the real intention of Rao Chuan's group is to rely on hype to gain more attention and finally turn it into income.
How did Li Su**, Zhang Jie and Sima Nan get network traffic.
Li Su exposed Zhang Jie and Sima Nan.
What kind of money did Rao Jun's team make?Li Su said that Sima Nan made ten times his own money, Li Su, a super big V, made a lot of money, and Sima Nan was ten times as much as him, so Sima Nan, Zhang Jie, and Rao Zhun made a lot of money.
In this regard, there is a big difference between Dr. Wen Tiejun and Zhang Jie. Dr. Wen Tiejun took out all the money earned by the Internet company he ran to donate, so what should Zhang Jie do?With the support of Jao Tsung-i's team, Zhang Jie has earned hundreds of millions of dollars on the InternetDid he donate to the ** company?
Sima Nan. Now Sima Nan scolded Zhang Jie"Called the beast", made a lot of money, and the two of them may make a lot of money in the future, even if they lose, they will not lose anything. I have to say, they really know it"Rice rings"with"Ecze"routines.