Hello, this is a new article I rewrote: Title of the article: How to correctly view the problem of insults In the village, Lin Mou, a villager representative, was finally detained for 10 days and fined 500 yuan for making insulting remarks to the village chief Zhao at the village inspection meeting. The case has sparked a lot of controversy, with questions being raised about the definition of insult and the court's decision. So, what kind of rhetoric constitutes an insult?Was the court's decision fair and reasonable?These are questions that require serious consideration. Looking back on the case, the contradiction between Lin and Zhao originated from an inspection conference.
At the meeting, Zhao put forward some opinions to Lin's group, which angered Lin, and eventually led to a fierce quarrel between the two sides, Lin called Zhao a "scumbag", and Zhao also scolded Lin. Subsequently, Zhao called the police and said that Lin had insulted him, which eventually led to Lin's detention and fine. First, we need to be clear about the definition of insults. According to the law, no one may infringe on the human dignity of others. In this case, Lin's remarks have constituted an infringement of Zhao's personal dignity.
Although it is not uncommon for people to quarrel with each other on a normal day, when such remarks are made in front of everyone, it already constitutes a blatant insult. Therefore, the court's judgment was not biased in favor of the village chief, but was based on respect for the law and a fair judgment. Second, the Public Security Bureau's decision to impose a penalty was in accordance with legal procedures. Before making a penalty decision, the Public Security Bureau listened to Lin's statement and made a penalty decision in accordance with the law. The law of our country attaches great importance to the legality of the procedure, and in this case, the punishment procedure of the Public Security Bureau was in accordance with the law.
Finally, on the question of why Zhao was not punished, mainly because the crime of insult is a crime of personal accusation. In other words, if the victim does not sue the perpetrator, then the perpetrator does not have to bear the corresponding legal responsibility. In this case, Lin did not ask the judicial authorities to punish Zhao's abuse, so Zhao did not receive corresponding legal sanctions. To sum up, we need to be cautious in our daily lives, especially when we make speeches. Any act that insults the human dignity of others will be punished by law.
I hope that everyone can take this case as a warning, stay rational and calm in case of trouble, and avoid legal disputes caused by impulse. At the same time, it also reminds everyone that in the face of unfair treatment, we must take up the law in time to protect our rights and interests.