In November 1934, during the Long March, after the Red Army successfully broke through the "second blockade line" laid by Chiang Kai-shek, in the face of new threats, the insistence and decision of the commander of the Red First Army ** triggered a thrilling military crisis.
The Red Army was facing a blockade of more than 200,000 local Kuomintang troops along the line of the Guangdong-Hankou Railway in Hunan and Guangdong. **Insight into the situation, give the Red First Army an important task: occupy Jiufeng Mountain, block the enemy, and protect the transfer of **columns.
The Red Army was in danger and refused to carry out orders.
Jiufeng Mountain is geographically critical and is the commanding heights in the northeast of the Guangdong-Hanzhou Railway, and controlling it means taking the lead in the confrontation with the enemy and ensuring the safety of the ** column. However, in the face of the Kuomintang attack, ** refused to carry out the order to seize Jiufeng Mountain, but proposed to change the plan, walk the plain, and try to break through Lechang in one fell swoop.
As a political commissar, he has a strong sense of organization and discipline, and after discovering his decision, he resolutely objected and demanded the implementation of the orders of the Military Commission. However, ** insisted that the occupation of Jiufeng Mountain was redundant, and would disperse the troops and consume physical strength, and advocated quickly taking the plains to occupy Lechang.
** Resolutely opposed, and the military leadership is fiercely disputed.
In the fierce dispute, ** emphasized: "We must not violate the general principle, that is, to cover the ** column and follow-up troops as the core task, otherwise it will be arbitrary and irresponsible!" * However, he insisted on his own point of view on the grounds of "improvisation and adaptation to the times".
Zuo Quan, chief of staff of the corps, proposed a compromise plan, suggesting that a small force be sent to quickly reconnoiter and obtain the enemy's information before making a final decision. **did not hesitate to agree, and **reluctantly agreed to send a reconnaissance unit.
The final decision was made to ensure the safe transfer of the Red Army.
Chen Guang, commander of the 2nd Red Division, led a small unit to Lechang to reconnoitre, and quickly discovered that a large number of enemy troops were rapidly advancing towards Lechang. In the face of the facts, ** finally agreed to seize Jiufeng Mountain and no longer insisted on the original opinion.
As it turned out later, it was precisely because the Red 1st Army occupied Jiufeng Mountain before the arrival of the enemy, ensured the safety of the ** column and the follow-up troops, and successfully achieved a safe transfer. After learning about the incident, he fully affirmed the practice of Zuoquan's adherence to discipline.
This decisive crisis was not only an episode in the Red Army's Long March, but also a thrilling history, in which the 1st Red Army's resolute decision at a critical moment ultimately defended the safety of the entire marching army. This story teaches us that every choice in military decision-making can affect the overall situation, and that wise and decisive decisions can lead to victory.
This article vividly depicts a fierce decision and controversy between the Red Army during the Long March when it was in crisis at Jiufeng Mountain. As the article says, this period of history is a thrilling episode in the Red Army's Long March, and it is also the courage and determination of the Red First Army at a critical moment.
First of all, the article shows the grim situation faced by the Red Army's Long March by describing the background. After breaking through the "second blockade line", the Red Army faced a new blockade laid by Chiang Kai-shek, and Jiufeng Mountain became the key commanding heights for the safe transfer of the Red Army. This explanation of the background makes the reader deeply feel the pressure and sense of crisis faced by the Red Army at that time.
Secondly, by portraying the controversy between ** and ***, the article shows the different views and attitudes of the two military leaders in the face of the crisis. ** Advocate quickly walking the plains and occupying Lechang; And *** insisted on occupying Jiufeng Mountain, emphasizing the safety of covering the ** column and follow-up troops. This controversy not only reflected the tense atmosphere of the military leadership at the time, but also highlighted the difficult problem of how to weigh the pros and cons and make decisions that are in line with the overall situation at the critical moment of decision-making.
Third, the article shows a compromise way of thinking through the plan proposed by Chen Guang. Chen Guang's proposal was to send a small force to reconnoiter first, and then make a final decision after obtaining the enemy's information. This compromise takes into account the interests of all parties and balances speed and security. This also shows that rational thinking and listening to the opinions of all parties are effective ways to solve problems in times of crisis.
Finally, the article emphasizes the importance of final decision. After reconnaissance, the 1st Red Army finally decided to seize Jiufeng Mountain, and this bold decision ensured the safe transfer of the entire Red Army. This historical story not only tells us that decision-making should be closely integrated with the actual situation, but also emphasizes the key role of decision and execution in success.
Overall, this article vividly demonstrates the wisdom and courage of the 1st Red Army in a moment of crisis by recounting a decisive decision made during the Long March. This historical story has positive implications for understanding the criticality of military decision-making and how to work together as a team to make informed decisions.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!