Recently, Redman has been lost, and the Russian army has been routed on all fronts. In the face of the encirclement of the Ukrainian army, 5 regiments suffered heavy losses. Kadyrov strongly condemned the cronyism of the Russian army's top brass and called for decisive measures to be taken to crush the invasion of the Ukrainian army in the four regions of eastern Ukraine.
Kadyrov's accusations are well-founded. The tactics shown by the Russian army in the Russia-Ukraine conflict are far from modern warfare. Field air defense systems are not used, UAVs and electronic countermeasures facilities are lacking to strike at the Ukrainian army. During the retreat, the Russian army actually took civilian vehicles, and the defense industry fell into serious problems and was unable to produce military vehicles.
What's more serious is that more than 200 days after the start of the war, although the Ukrainian army ** has more than 100,000 people, it can still put in 10 brigades of regular troops and maintain a high degree of combat effectiveness. The Russian army failed to annihilate the units above the division level of the Ukrainian army, and only eliminated the living forces of the combat units subordinate to the Ukrainian army. The Ukrainian army continues to reorganize and train its troops with the help of its high command units, and compensates for the losses of soldiers by calling up reserve units and civilians.
The replenishment method of the Ukrainian army is similar to **, after the main force is damaged, reserve officers and soldiers are called to replenish, veterans are often on the second line, and new recruits are directly on the front line to fight. This combat strategy retains the backbone of veterans, and even if the recruits are miserable, those who survive will become veterans and enhance the overall combat effectiveness of the Ukrainian army.
The Russian army failed to annihilate the units above the division level of the Ukrainian army, resulting in the fact that the divisional and brigade-level combat units of the Ukrainian army were able to preserve their combat effectiveness by repeatedly replenishing new recruits. The Ukrainian army in the Kherson and Kharkiv directions has maintained its combat effectiveness for a long time by keeping veterans and new soldiers. Although the Russian army killed and injured a large number of Ukrainian recruits, it failed to eliminate the backbone of the veterans and the command structure of the Ukrainian army, resulting in the combat effectiveness of the Ukrainian combat brigade remaining stable.
In the deployment of actual combat troops, the Ukrainian army maintains its combat effectiveness by preserving veterans and recruits. The number of surviving veterans of the various divisions and brigades of the Ukrainian army has increased, and the combat effectiveness has increased with the duration of the war.
The advantage of a war of annihilation is that the goal is to destroy the enemy's building and warfare forces, inflicting irreparable damage on the enemy. For the Russian army, the consequences of annihilating one division of the Ukrainian army are far greater than the defeat of several enemy divisions. The Ukrainian army must reorganize, train and equip a division, which will cost huge manpower, material and financial resources, which will affect the overall combat effectiveness.
However, the Russian army failed to understand this and insisted on a rout, which could only kill and wound the middle and lower ranks of the Ukrainian army and grassroots officers, and failed to massively eliminate the backbone of veterans. As a result, the Ukrainian army was able to quickly recover its combat effectiveness, and launched a full-scale counterattack more than 200 days after the start of the war, almost completely annihilating 5 regiments of the Russian army.
Why didn't the Russian army choose a war of annihilation?Perhaps it has something to do with the idea of controlling the scale of the war, but not fighting a war of annihilation has caused serious problems for the Russian army to fight. The lessons of the Russian army are worth deeply learning from all the leading experts.
Redman falls, the Russian army rout crisis!Kadyrov angrily rebuked the top brass for why the war of annihilation has not started for a long timeThe Ukrainian army's counterattack has attracted global attention!
The above detailed analysis of the reasons for the loss of the Russian army in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict and its tactical loopholes, as well as the clever response methods of the Ukrainian army. The article mentions Kadyrov's dissatisfaction and the various mistakes of the Russian army's top brass, especially the failure to adopt a strategy of annihilation warfare, which allowed the Ukrainian army to maintain its combat effectiveness for a long time. Below, we will comment on this situation.
First of all, the article reveals the shortcomings of the Russian army in terms of tactics and military strategy, especially the failure to fully apply field air defense systems, unmanned aerial vehicles and electronic countermeasures facilities in modern warfare. This indicates that the Russian army is lagging behind in the military-technical field and lacks the ability to adapt to the needs of contemporary warfare. This is a worrying sign for a country with strong military power, and it also shows the urgency of updating and upgrading military technology.
Secondly, Kadyrov's condemnation of the top brass of the Russian army is justified to a certain extent. Nepotism at the top, and failure to properly assess the situation and develop effective response strategies, led to the loss of Redman and the rout on all fronts. This kind of leadership mistake has seriously affected the overall combat effectiveness of the Russian army and should arouse a high degree of vigilance among relevant decision-makers.
As for the response strategy of the Ukrainian army, the article points out the way they use to preserve veterans and recruits, as well as to maintain the combat effectiveness of divisional and brigade-level combat units by repeatedly replenishing new recruits. This strategy may seem simple, but it has been quite successful at the strategic level of the Ukrainian army. This not only reflects the flexibility and strategic thinking of the Ukrainian army, but also highlights their tenacity and adaptability in the war.
The most important point is that the article deeply analyzes the importance of the war of annihilation. A war of annihilation can not only directly destroy the enemy's living forces, but also inflict irreparable losses on the enemy's combat power. In modern warfare, the importance of annihilation warfare is even more prominent, because a powerful blow to the enemy's key units will produce more significant results.
Overall, this commentary argues that the above provides an in-depth analysis of the key issues in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, revealing the strengths and weaknesses of both sides, especially emphasizing the strategic significance of the war of annihilation. For military enthusiasts and policymakers, this is an article worth pondering and learning valuable lessons from it to improve their own military strategy.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!