Ukraine** Zelensky is not discouraged by the failure of Biden's 100 billion aid bill to pass the Senate. Instead, he did not hesitate to present the United States with an ambitious list of armament requirements, including the Apache Wuzhi, the Black Hawk GM-9B reconnaissance drone, the F-16 fighter, the Super Hornet, the THAAD anti-missile system, the C-130 transport aircraft and the C-17 strategic transport aircraft. This move shows that Ukraine has high hopes for the support of the United States and hopes to be supported by more advanced equipment. According to Ukrainska Pravda, the United States used the tactic of "slicing sausages" in the early days of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, first providing Ukraine with some defensive** to test Russia's response.
Subsequently, the United States gradually provided more aggressive artillery, drones, tanks, combat vehicles and missiles. At the same time, the United States has also joined forces with its allies to conduct military Xi in Europe to strategically deter Russia and prevent it from taking any action against NATO. At this pace, it seems to be a natural process for the United States to provide Ukraine with more lethal **. However, Ukraine's one-time request for eight new types of ** may be a little anxious. At the moment, it is unlikely that the United States will meet such a request. Because whether it is a fighter or an anti-missile system, its value is much higher than that of artillery, drones, etc. The United States needs to carefully weigh the pros and cons and analyze the actual value of Ukraine to it.
At the moment, the Ukrainian army is at a stalemate on the front line, and no matter how much ** support is provided, it will not be able to change its predicament on the battlefield, which is not an ideal situation for the United States. Coupled with the approach of 2024**, domestic opposition to aid to Ukraine is rising. A poll showed that a year ago, 60 percent of Americans supported providing ** aid to Ukraine, and now that percentage has dropped to 48 percent. It also makes the United States even more hesitant to provide more aid to Ukraine. The U.S. aid to Ukraine has been questioned by more and more American people, who have lost patience and confidence in the indefinite assistance.
While 90 percent of aid money is said to end up in the United States, benefiting only the military-industrial complex, the goal of American taxpayers is to improve education, health care, and infrastructure at home, not to bolster the military-industrial complex. Therefore, Biden ** constantly provides assistance to Ukraine, primarily in the interests of the military-industrial complex, which will obviously cause widespread opposition. Considering the upcoming U.S. event, Biden may no longer be able to continue large-scale assistance to Ukraine. However, even if U.S. aid is likely to be reduced, the conflict between Ukraine and Russia will not end easily. Ukraine** Zelensky rejected a ceasefire and declared that he would defeat 2.2 million Russian troops.
Russia does not want to get bogged down in an endless war, so defense alone is not enough, they need to continue the offensive and push the front into the interior of Ukraine until the elimination of the Kyiv regime led by Zelensky. Only in this way will Russia be able to achieve the goals they set out and prove that NATO's eastward expansion has been effectively countered.