Recently, the hinge patent dispute between Xiaomi's Yu Chengdong and Xiaomi has attracted widespread attention. While we are looking forward to Yu's response, the controversy seems to be over. In fact, this is not surprising that Xiaomi is unlikely to sue Yu Chengdong because it is just a casual comment and it is difficult to file a lawsuit. Similarly, Yu Chengdong is unlikely to sue Xiaomi, because Xiaomi has a reasonable defense, after all, it is difficult to prove Xiaomi's plagiarism in terms of patent structure and timeline. However, judging from the matter itself, Yu Chengdong may have been a little impulsive and exaggerated the facts, but it gave Xiaomi a chance to become famous. In fact, in this industry, there is an open secret, that is, to find an opponent who is stronger than oneself and insist on confronting him head-on. Then through various comparisons, regardless of whether the product really wins or not, the user will have an impression in their minds that the two brands are on the same level. Therefore, at domestic mobile phone conferences, we often see comparisons with Apple, comparing Apple's disadvantages by highlighting its own advantages, and even comparing the size of the bezel and the screen-to-body ratio. This is to give consumers a notion that the phone is comparable to Apple, thus increasing the value of their own brand. No brand will compare itself with a weaker brand product, which will only devalue itself. And Yu Chengdong's exaggeration gave Xiaomi such an opportunity. In the minds of users, Huawei's folding screen is the highest level of existence, and it is not the same level as Xiaomi's folding screen. As is customary, it is impossible for Xiaomi to be compared with Huawei, and it is impossible for Huawei to be compared with Xiaomi, which is an act of devaluing the value of both parties. However, Yu Chengdong's comments gave Xiaomi such an opportunity. Xiaomi's grinding shaft hinge is actually self-developed technology, from a structural point of view, it is more advanced than Huawei's first-generation double-spin drip chain chain, and Huawei's ** rod technology has not yet been officially launched. Through this incident, Xiaomi has greatly enhanced its presence and proved its strength, and all this has been achieved through the contribution of Yu Chengdong. So, what do you think of Yu Chengdong's remarks this time?According to reviews online, a lot of people support Xiaomi. Next, let's take a closer look at the issue.
Recently, the hinge patent dispute between Xiaomi's Yu Chengdong and Xiaomi has attracted widespread attention. Originally, everyone thought that Yu Chengdong would respond, but things did not develop as expected. This is not surprising, since it is difficult for Xiaomi to file a lawsuit against Yu Chengdong, since this is just a casual comment, there is no possibility of prosecution. Similarly, it is difficult for Yu Chengdong to file a lawsuit against Xiaomi, because Xiaomi is justified and can hardly prove that Xiaomi plagiarized Huawei's patents.
However, judging from the incident itself, we can see that Yu Chengdong may have been a little impulsive this time, exaggerating the truth and giving Xiaomi a chance to become famous. Xiaomi took the opportunity to show its strength and increase the recognition of the brand through this controversy. All thanks to Yu Chengdong's remarks.
In the tech industry, there's an open secret: find a better opponent than yourself and go head-to-head with it. Through comparison with competitors, regardless of whether the product really wins or not, users will form an impression in their minds that the two brands are of the same grade. Therefore, at the domestic mobile phone conference, we often see the comparison with Apple. Each brand compares Apple's disadvantages by highlighting its own strengths, even in terms of bezel size and screen-to-body ratio. This is intended to increase the value of their brand by making consumers think that their phones are comparable to Apple's.
However, in this incident, Yu Chengdong's exaggeration gave Xiaomi such an opportunity. Originally, according to traditional conventions, it was impossible for Xiaomi to be compared with Huawei, and neither was willing to devalue itself. However, Yu Chengdong's comments gave Xiaomi a chance, and in the minds of users, Xiaomi's grinding shaft hinge technology is more advanced than Huawei's first-generation double-spinning drip chain, and Huawei's ** rod technology has not yet been officially launched. Through this controversy, Xiaomi has successfully increased its popularity and strength, all thanks to Yu Chengdong's contribution.
Through Yu Chengdong's comments, Xiaomi has found an opportunity to be able to compare with Huawei. In the minds of users, Huawei's folding screen is the ceiling of the industry, and the brand compared with it must be of the same grade. However, Yu Chengdong's comments this time provide Xiaomi with such an opportunity. Xiaomi's grinding shaft hinge technology is self-developed and structurally more advanced than Huawei's first-generation double-spin drip chain. And Huawei's ** pole technology has not yet been launched. Through this incident, Xiaomi successfully brushed a wave of presence and proved its strength to the outside world. All thanks to Yu Chengdong's remarks.
Based on the rhetoric on the Internet, we can see that many people support Xiaomi. After this controversy, Xiaomi's image in the hearts of netizens has become more positive. This shows that Xiaomi has successfully used Yu Chengdong's remarks to successfully enhance the recognition and strength of the company's brand. Xiaomi took this opportunity to show its R&D strength and technical level, and at the same time broke Huawei's monopoly in the field of folding screens.
To sum up, Yu Chengdong may have been a little impulsive and exaggerated the facts in this controversy. However, it was precisely because of his remarks that Xiaomi was given a rare opportunity to become famous. Xiaomi has successfully compared itself with Huawei through its own technology and strength, and has enhanced its brand value and presence. This controversy not only allowed Xiaomi to gain more attention and support in the industry, but also proved that Xiaomi is a competitive technology company that values innovation.