Speaking of interesting things, Biden may not have expected that the so-called "slap" he gave to Britain would indirectly help China to breathe. What is even more interesting is that Britain never imagined that it would become a "hostage" of its own people. It may sound a bit tongue-in-cheek, but let me break it down for you.
As we all know, with the continuous development of China's comprehensive national strength in recent years, the countries we are competing with have long since shifted from other countries to the United States. Whether we admit it or not, it is no secret that the United States regards China as an "imaginary enemy." Therefore, the game between China and the United States has become an international hot spot, and US actions against China have long been commonplace. Against this background, the United States has changed its past strategy of "fighting alone" and has instead adopted the method of "group fighting."
Therefore, we can clearly see that some countries still choose to take action against China, even though they have no geopolitical contradictions with China, and even thousands of miles away from China, and there is no question of who threatens whose security. Here, I criticize Britain by name in particular. Recently, in order to curry favor with the United States, the United Kingdom decided to abandon China-linked companies and remove Chinese components from its facilities, citing "cybersecurity".
Truth be told, this move by the UK is really speechless. After all, those Chinese modules were installed to ensure the safe and stable operation of the power grid, and now they are being dismantled because of the non-existent "cybersecurity". This not only leads to a surge in costs, but also causes unnecessary disruption to the operation and ** of the power grid. However, Britain did more than this one ridiculous thing in order to pander to the United States.
Previously, the British Navy abandoned the employment of Chinese laundry workers on the grounds of "espionage risk". At the time, the move sparked widespread heated discussions. After all, the British Navy has always had a tradition of hiring Chinese to wash clothes for British sailors, a tradition that dates back even to the 30s of the last century. In this regard, many international commentators have been blunt. Some commentators even directly pointed out that Britain's move is like an "old peacock opening the screen". This means that Britain is self-inflicted, believing that as long as it is anti-China, it can get the protection of the United States.
However, what is gratifying is that without waiting for China to make a move, Biden cut off his "right arm" and created a ** annoyance for the UK. And the British probably didn't expect that they had become "hostages" of their own people. Recently, Biden quietly shelved the US-UK partnership plan, saying that he would not sign any "foundational" agreement before the two countries, the prelude to the much-anticipated comprehensive freedom agreement. In other words, Biden **directly refuses to conclude a liberal** deal with the UK, and is not even interested in negotiating.
Despite the disappointment expressed by the British side, what can they do?To be honest, it's really funny, the United States shouts about human rights, democracy and freedom every day, but when it comes to freedom, why is it so difficult to reach an agreement?From this point of view, China did not intervene, and it was the United States that really put Britain in trouble.
After Brexit, it suddenly became clear that there was no real relationship between the United States and the United Kingdom. In the face of the fact that the EU cannot turn back, the United States cannot sign, China and Russia have offended again, and the United Kingdom has become a joke. This reminds people of a sentence: it is not that China cannot afford to fight, but that the United States has taught Britain that it is more cost-effective.