Today, a netizen asked me to talk about an editorial on Caixin.com: "Revisiting the Ideological Line of Seeking Truth from Facts", I probably read the first half, because the latter is not allowed to be watched, and you need to pay for a subscription. But despite this, I found a very surprising problem from this article. I think this may be the original intention of this netizen who wanted me to watch it. To be honest, my income is barely enough to make ends meet, so I don't want to pay for a year's worth of articles just because of them. But from the first half, I feel that the focus of this article is not quite right, or that the orientation is a bit wrong, and to put it bluntly, it means that this author or some ** have bad intentions, why?Let me briefly comment on what I think of this article.
The picture above is what I was able to see, because today is the 130th anniversary of ***'s birth, and this article was published yesterday. At the beginning of this article, we talk about reform and opening up in the past 45 years, but we ignore the basic things, that is, who laid the foundation of New China and who put forward the thesis of seeking truth from facts. At the beginning of this article, there are two important guiding contents that we should pay attention to: First, we should resolutely put an end to the class struggleSecond, it emphasized that after a decade of turmoil. We may think it is ordinary at first glance, but after thinking about it carefully, we feel that it is not right, this author's article was published on December 25, that is, yesterday, he clearly knows that the next day is the 130th anniversary of the birth of ***, not only do they not mention ***, they do not miss the great contribution made by *** to the establishment and development of New China, and do not think about *** Under his leadership, New China established a complete industrial system on the basis of poverty and whiteness, and did not want to think about the tremendous achievements made in the international struggle under the complicated situation at that time, but instead mentioned these two controversial topics
Of course, we do not deny the major historic achievements made by our country in various fields of construction over the past several decades, and we have been witnessing the development, prosperity, and strength of the motherland. Although the first half of the article is to praise the great achievements made since the reform and opening up, if you ignore the essential things and ignore the contribution of ***, I think this article belongs to a kind of low-level red and high-level black content, anyway, I personally think that the intentions are bad. The title of the article is to revisit the ideological line of seeking truth from facts, but have we ever known that seeking truth from facts was the magic weapon to defeat the enemy back then?**In the article "Transforming Our Learning", it is pointed out that "facts" are all things that objectively exist;"Yes" is the internal connection of objective things, that is, regularity;"Seeking" means that we study. **Think: seeking truth from facts, that is, we must grasp the laws of the development of things, so as to carefully study these laws and find the interconnection between things. Maintaining the attitude of seeking truth from facts is an expression of party spirit and a Marxist-Leninist style that unifies theory and practice.
I don't know what this so-called Caixin is like**, I just checked it, it seems to be a subsidiary of Caixin Media, and Caixin Media is a media company focusing on the financial field. Founded in 1999, Caixin Media is headquartered in Hong Kong with branches in Chinese mainland, Hong Kong, Taiwan and Singapore. Therefore, such a financial ** headquartered in Hong Kong suddenly talked about these contents on the occasion of the 130th anniversary of the birth of ***, which made me have to doubt the background and position of this **. Since it is finance and economics, you can just talk about your financial content, why do you want to talk about the issue of taking class struggle as the key link and the turmoil of the past ten years?To be honest, there are actually some things that these people can not understand. At the beginning of the founding of New China, how many imperialist ** people and reactionary spies were lurking in the country, and if they had not been able to crack down on these people and not attach importance to the class struggle at that time, would the ordinary people have a good life?Can you maintain a happy and stable life?
After reform and opening up, some reactionary forces in the country have basically been eliminated, and because of the needs of the times and the needs of development, the focus has shifted to economic construction, and this has also been formulated in accordance with the spirit of seeking truth from facts. But despite this, we did not say that there is no class struggle, and we have not forgotten the words of his old man, and the eight words of heightened vigilance and defense of the motherland are applicable at all times. We don't want to think that we don't want to develop the economy, but at that time, the domestic situation was complicated, and New China had just been established. Only one year after the founding of the People's Republic of China, for the long-term security of the country, focusing on the international situation at that time, he commanded the War to Resist US Aggression and Aid Korea. Therefore, under the situation at that time, we vigorously developed heavy industry, which is the foundation of the country's industrialization and an important guarantee to ensure the best quality.
On April 25, 1956, at the enlarged meeting of the Politburo, he made a speech entitled "On the Ten Major Relations", in which he said, "Making good use of and developing the old industrial foundation along the coast can make us more powerful to develop and support the industries in the interior." If a negative attitude is adopted, it will hinder the rapid development of industries in the interior." This also fully shows that in that era, the first has attached great importance to the development of coastal industries, and it also shows his great determination to build a prosperous and powerful new China. Some of our economic experts and financial experts are now opening and closing their mouths after the reform and opening up, but have you ever thought that if there was no heavy industry foundation laid in those years, and if there was no complete industrial foundation at that time, if China could develop?The reason why China has been able to develop rapidly after the reform and opening up is due to three aspects: First, a solid industrial foundation;The second is a stable surrounding environment;The third is the revolutionary feeling of unity. And these three contents, which one can leave ***
On the occasion of the 130th anniversary of the birth of ***, I think that the people of the whole country, like me, are deeply remembering *** The glory of his old man not only made the Chinese people who had experienced humiliation stand up, but also let the proletariat of the whole world see the dawn of hope, he is a red banner, fluttering above the head of world communism. Therefore, the reason why China has been able to consistently maintain high-speed economic development, continuously improve its comprehensive national strength, and continuously improve the people's living standards since the reform and opening up to the present is that if there is no heavy industry, if there is no peace for decades, and if there is no clean domestic environment, can we have today's high-speed development and a happy life?Therefore, objectively dealing with historical issues and firmly remembering the teachings of the whole country is still the magic weapon for our party to lead the people of the whole country to resist imperialism today. A netizen said it well: The attitude of the Communist Party of China towards the Communist Party of China determines the attitude of the Chinese people towards the Communist Party, and also directly affects the world's attitude towards China.
100 help plan