Why are fireworks being set off again now?
Why are the bans that have been in place for decades in various regions suddenly said to be illegal?
It's 12 o'clock on Chinese New Year's Eve, and a few people have started setting off sporadic firecrackers near the neighborhood. Every now and then, there was a sound that shook me so much that I couldn't sleep, and the thousands of residents in the whole community certainly couldn't sleep either. Tonight affects sleep, and tomorrow's work status will definitely be affected!
Ordinary people like to shoot guns?I watched upstairs for a long time, and the children were put away from beginning to end. There are a lot of people applauding on the Internet!But from the actual behavior, a very small number of people are firing guns, and everyone is not as enthusiastic as they are on the Internet!The phenomenon is very contrasting, is it a water army on the Internet?After all, if the economy is not good, you still take money to burn, and when you really pay for it, you will weigh it
The relevant departments said that everyone has the right to enjoy fireworks, and some netizens said that the epidemic has been so long that everyone is happy. In the past, the local government purchased fireworks and set them off uniformly. Citizens have never been deprived of their right to enjoy fireworks, and their joy has always been rushing. Moreover, from the perspective of overall social benefits, the previous practice of unified purchase, unified time, and unified discharge seems to be less expensive in the case of meeting the needs of all parties. Citizens have to set off their own fireworks, and local governments have also figured out effective management methods, such as demarcating areas for fireworks!Citizens who want to fire guns and citizens who don't want to affect their rest can get different needs at the same time.
Some netizens also said that they wanted to drive consumption. Fireworks have been banned for so many years, and the industry is probably not very good. To drive consumption, wouldn't it be better to choose one that makes a lot of money?Like tourism or something. Why did you choose fireworks as a project with high public costs and low returns?Especially from the consumption of public resources such as municipal sanitation, environmental protection, fire protection, etc., the public cost is higher!
In the past, there were still government decrees that did not allow older migrant workers to work on construction sites, and they had never heard of itThe launch of the tiger and the snake tail is just not to have a safety accident, and does not consider the problem of others eating and making money at all. It seems that this kind of laws and regulations that affect the whole country are not uniformly grasped and formulated, but issued by each department itselfCommanding all levels of the country, I have the impression that only *** can have this right!
What is the reason for this method of governance that bypasses the main line of power?It doesn't seem to have lowered the cost of governance, right?If there are benefits: not allowing migrant workers to make money is good for increasing the number of unemployed people and intensifying labor-management contradictions?Saying that the local ** is illegal is good for intensifying the contradiction between the local government and the **?These things suddenly appeared, they had never heard of them before, and it didn't do them any good for the seemingly small "relevant departments" to do these things, right?
What a strange phenomenon!