After the outbreak in Gansu, people from all walks of life, celebrities and some enterprises have generously donated funds and materials to the disaster area. This was originally a very good thing, and it fully demonstrated our country's good tradition of supporting from all sides when one side is in trouble. However, recently, some well-intentioned people have picked up everyone's love donations through various means and published them on the Internet**, and at the same time, they have also put pressure on celebrities and enterprises that have no donation records, asking them to make additional donations to the disaster area. The author would like to say that these people are a bit unkind in doing so, and their behavior is completely a kind of moral kidnapping, which has little positive meaning and will cause many people to resent it.
Donation, as the name suggests, is a kind of voluntary donation and gifting, whether it is a company or a celebrity, whether you are willing to donate or not, and how much you are willing to donate, it is a kind of free behavior. Donation is a manifestation of social responsibility and a display of beautiful moral feelings, but not donating does not violate any moral law. But nowadays, forcing others to donate seems to be a very morally noble behavior, which is a bit of a reversal of the cart. At any time, it is the most important thing for any business and celebrity to be able to operate normally and develop healthily. It is also their normal operation that provides countless jobs for the society and pays a large amount of social taxes. Businesses and celebrities who do not evade taxes and can develop in a healthy and orderly manner are the greatest and best contributions to society. In the face of catastrophes, companies and celebrities are willing to stand up and actively donate money and materials, which is very worthy of recognition. But such a thing can be called, but it cannot be forced, because there is no legal basis for coercion.
Of course, many of our companies and celebrities now earn money from the beautiful people of "patriotism for the people", and for them, in times of catastrophe, they can give more calls, and they are limited to calls. One is that most of them know better than anyone else that the huge economic benefits that will be brought by establishing such a persona. The other is that they are always facing the problem of survival and development, I believe that when the economic benefits are good, they will consciously take the initiative to donate, if the economic benefits are not good, they still have to ensure their own healthy development.
Many times, these good deeds on the Internet stand up and morally kidnap companies and celebrities, not really for the people in the disaster area and vulnerable groups, but more for eyeballs and traffic. If you ask them how much they have donated and can they make it public, they will almost certainly be the first to go dumb. Therefore, I advise these good deeds, do not do to others what you do not want to do to yourself, please don't use that idle mouth to constantly provoke trouble, for things like doing good deeds, it is never forced out, but more from the heart.