In the course of China's rule of law, there was a contest for justice, and that was the case of Lao Rongzhi.
Today, we finally have a final trial of this case, the execution of the death penalty.
This battle for justice was not all smooth sailing, but it showed the rigorous handling of cases and fair judgments in a society governed by the rule of law.
Lo Rongzhi, with his ability to perform disguises, has been at large for a long time.
However, she was finally arrested by the public security organs on November 28, 2019, and the trial for her crime was opened.
The Nanchang City Intermediate People's Court found that Lao Rongzhi had committed intentional homicide, robbery, kidnapping, and other crimes, and decided to carry out the death sentence, deprive him of his political rights for life, and confiscate all his personal property.
However, the case was not all smooth sailing.
Some have questioned the length of the Supreme Court's review of her death sentence, arguing that the evidence provided in the second instance was not clear and comprehensive, leading to controversy over the final review results.
This has raised questions and confusion about the verdict among some.
Some people even shouted grievances for Lao Rongzhi, thinking that in court, she has been passing the buck to others, showing herself as weak and stupid.
However, in the face of so much ironclad evidence, lies are difficult to maintain after all.
Lo Rongzhi's lawyer may have worked hard, but in the end he can only say, "I have done my best."
In this regard, some netizens mentioned that the Supreme Court's review time may be due to the long time.
The evidence provided in the first and second instance trials was not clear and comprehensive, and the results of the review were controversial.
This has led to the expectation that this will be a verdict that will stand the test.
In this process, the intervention of the lawyer and ** made ** deviate many times, increasing the complexity of the matter.
The wife of the victim, the "little carpenter", expressed her "great joy" at the final verdict, saying: "I have waited too long for the seven undead to give an account."
This reflects the desire of the families of the victims for justice and the desire for an end to the case.
After more than four years of review, the conclusion of the execution of the death sentence was finally reached.
In this process, ** once deviated, and the work of the court was also questioned somewhat.
However, the final verdict shows the rigor of the case and the adherence to justice in a society governed by the rule of law.
When writing about the role of lawyers, the article pointed out that the defense of lawyers is a right given to defendants in a society governed by the rule of law, and even if the result is doomed, lawyers must go all out.
This perspective reminds people that in a society governed by the rule of law, it is the bounden duty of lawyers to uphold fairness and justice.
Finally, the article calls on society to understand that the contest between justice and ** is complex and severe, but in the end justice will prevail.
The conclusion of the Lo Rongzhi case is an explanation of the victim and a victory for a society governed by the rule of law.
In this process, the rule of law society has withstood the test of the best and demonstrated the principle of fairness and justice in the rule of law.
In general, the final judgment in the Lo Rongzhi case reflects the prudent handling of the case and the fair judgment of the society under the rule of law.
The blade of justice finally split the ghost of **, allowing society to see the power of the rule of law and the victory of justice.