The Russian army suffered Waterloo!Three advanced warplanes were ambushed, and thousands were killed In a recent military confrontation, the Russian army suffered a major setback. What seemed like a battle of victory suddenly turned into the Waterloo of the Russian army. In this encounter, Russia lost its highly acclaimed Su-34 front-line fighter-bomber, which was undoubtedly a heavy blow.
According to a report by Al Arabiya on December 23, the commander of the Ukrainian Air Force, Mykola Oleshchuk, announced that they successfully ambushed three Russian Su-34 multipurpose bombers on the afternoon of the 22nd. The fighter jets were attacked in the southern regions of Ukraine, and in a speech on Friday evening, Zelenskyy expressed his gratitude to the soldiers who successfully shot down the Russian fighter jets in the Kherson region, noting that it was the credit of the Odessa Air Missile Defense Battalion of the Ukrainian Air Force.
The Su-34 fighter-bomber is known for its high maneuverability, all-weather combat capability, supersonic flight and twin-engine, two-seat configuration. It can carry a wide range of air-guided **, and 12** pylons can carry up to 8 tons of ammunition. As one of the most advanced aircraft in service with the Air Force and Space Forces of the Russian Federation, each Su-34 costs at least $50 million, which is a significant economic loss for the Russian army.
The Secretary of the State Defense Council of Ukraine Oleksy Danilov noted that the hunt for Russian Su-34 fighter-bombers has been going on for quite some time. These fighters caused serious distress to the defense of the southern regions of Ukraine. The specifics of the shooting down of the three Russian Su-34 fighter-bombers were disclosed in a speech by the spokesman for the Air Force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Colonel Yuriy Ignat, in a speech on Army TV. He said that Russian pilots have recently become overconfident and tried to launch guided aerial bombs deeper into the Ukrainian defenses, but in the end their operation failed and were successfully shot down by Ukrainian missile systems.
Colonel Ignat also proudly claimed that the Ukrainian air defense forces elegantly destroyed three Russian Su-34s at lightning speed. This is not the first time that a Russian fighter has been shot down, and similar incidents have occurred in the Bryansk direction and in the Odessa region, which caught the Russian army by surprise. The Ukrainian Air Force did not specify which systems were used to shoot down the fighters, but some experts speculate that it may have been caused by more advanced anti-aircraft missile systems than the S-300.
Ukraine's UKR** reported on December 23 that Russian sources said the downdown was similar to the "Bryansk Big**" incident in May this year, when the Ukrainian Air Force shot down five Russian warplanes in five minutes over the Bryansk region. It is reported about the involvement of the Patriot anti-aircraft missile system in this operation. Although the Russian side did not comment on Ukraine's claim that "three Russian Su-34 fighters were shot down in one day", the incident was undoubtedly historic and attracted widespread attention from Russian commentators and propagandists.
There is speculation in Russian military blogs that the cause of this significant loss is most likely the Patriot anti-aircraft missile system. Another war blogger also reported on the situation with the Su-34 bombers, saying they were shot down by the MIM-104 Patriot system while dropping gliding bombs on a Ukrainian bridge on the eastern bank of the Dnieper.
Since the start of the war between Russia and Ukraine, Western countries led by the United States have provided Ukraine with a large amount of military assistance, including a variety of advanced air defense systems. The aid has helped Ukraine build a multi-layered air defense system, including the world's most advanced Patriot air defense system, the NASAMS IRIS-T and Samp T air defense systems, as well as the Mole and Cheetah air defense systems, as well as hand-held portable air defense missile systems. In particular, the Patriot missiles provided by the United States, Germany and other countries have become a mortal threat to the Russian military's war structure.
It is worth noting that Ukrainska Pravda also disclosed in its report on December 23 that on the 22nd alone, the Ukrainian army killed 1,040 Russian soldiers and destroyed 17 Russian tanks. If this information is true, then the losses of the Russian army in this battle are too heavy, losing 3 advanced fighters and thousands of soldiers in one day, which is undoubtedly a huge setback.
To sum up, this incident not only marked a major defeat of the Russian army on the battlefield, but also demonstrated the efficiency and adaptability of the Ukrainian army in modern warfare. It emphasizes the importance of high-tech systems in modern warfare and poses new challenges to the development of military strategy and military technology. The event was also an important turning point in the international political and military balance, demonstrating the critical role of international cooperation and military assistance in shaping the outcome of conflicts. In this volatile international situation, every military action and tactical decision can be a key game-changer.
The aftermath of this incident has attracted widespread attention in the international community. This heavy loss of the Russian army was not only material, but also a blow at a strategic and psychological level. This incident shows that even among traditional military powers, there are points of vulnerability, and these points of vulnerability can be magnified in the complex environment of modern warfare.
On a tactical level, Russia's defeat in this military operation revealed the inadequacies of its tactical planning and intelligence gathering. This inadequacy makes its first-class fighter a long-planned target for the enemy. In addition, this incident also showed the adaptability and innovation of the Ukrainian army. Faced with technical and equipment deficiencies, the Ukrainian army was able to effectively use its limited resources and inflict heavy losses on the enemy.
From a broader perspective, this event also reflects the complexity and dynamics of current international relations. The military support of Western countries for Ukraine has not only changed the regional military balance, but also changed the pattern of international politics to some extent. This is especially evident in the advanced air defense systems supplied to Ukraine by the United States and European countries. The effective use of these systems poses a serious challenge to Russia, forcing it to reassess its military strategy in the region.
At the same time, the Russia-Ukraine conflict has exposed the limits of the international community's handling of such crises. While many countries have shown support for Ukraine, the number of countries that can actually provide effective assistance is limited. This poses a challenge not only for Ukraine, but also for other countries that may face similar conflicts.
Finally, this incident is also an important wake-up call for Russia itself. It not only reveals some of the weaknesses of the Russian army in modern warfare, but also shows Russia's tendency to isolate itself in the international arena. This isolation stems not only from its military operations, but also from its international policy. If Russia is to maintain its status as a global power, it will need to re-examine its role and tactics in the international community.
To sum up, this heavy loss of the Russian army is not only a simple military defeat, but also an important turning point in international politics and strategy. It has not only affected the future development of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, but also has a profound impact on the global political landscape. This incident underscores the importance of technology, strategic innovation, and international cooperation in modern warfare. In this volatile international environment, every country needs to carefully consider its military and diplomatic strategies to ensure its national interests and regional stability.