The uproarious "three-baby non-biological divorce case" finally ushered in ** recently, but the trial result was not pronounced in court.
It's really embarrassing to talk about this, challenging not only the bottom line of marriage, but also the bottom line of human nature and morality.
Since this incident, netizens have gathered fire to criticize the woman, believing that the woman has trampled on marriage, love, and moral bottom line, and must be severely punished, and compensate the man for the losses of the past 16 years, otherwise the moral standard will regress by 50 years again.
On December 28, the female policy responded to the recent hot issues that netizens have been concerned about, but her response did not calm the anger of netizens, but instead caused netizens to criticize and complain again.
After 16 years of marriage, the three babies are not biological, and this matter will collapse on anyone, and it took 16 years of hard work and 16 years of affection to ...... end
After the incident, the man's tragic experience made people sympathetic, and at the same time, he also launched rounds of verbal criticism and condemnation against the woman.
was originally the party at fault, and according to common sense, the woman should have sincerely admitted her mistakes and took the initiative to bear the mistakes she made in the condemnation of netizens.
What is unexpected is that instead of admitting her mistake, the woman continued to provoke the moral bottom line, saying".Is blood relationship so important?
The implication is that the child belongs to someone else, but you shouldn't care so much, it's your fault.
Such three views are really explosive, loyal to marriage, loyal to family, loyal to love, this is the most basic moral bottom line, but not only did she not keep the bottom line, but she did not even realize the seriousness of the problem and the unforgivable sins she committed.
What is even more infuriating is that the woman not only quibbled about her own mistakes, but also questioned the accuracy of the DNA, believing that the DNA may not be 100% accurate.
It is true that DNA is not 100% accurate, but it can be confirmed with great certainty whether it has anything to do with whether it is related to blood or not.
After 16 years of marriage, none of the three children are biological, and the woman betrayed her marriage, family, and love, which is an undeniable fact.
What is surprising is that the woman claimed in her response:"We have a relationship ......”
It is undeniable that after 16 years of getting along day and night, even a stone has been covered with heat, the man may indeed have feelings for the woman, and the woman may indeed be attached to the man.
However, one thing can be confirmed, the man's feelings for the woman should be sincere, but are the woman's feelings for the man real?
Please ask the woman herself, is the so-called "feeling" in your mouth worthy of the man?Is it worthy of the family?Is it worthy of marriage?Is it worth three children?
Feelings may exist, but loyalty is absolutely not. Rather than talking about feelings after betrayal, it is more appropriate to say that this so-called "feelings" are just a sense of atonement after betrayal.
From the current situation, the possibility of criminal responsibility on the part of the woman is almost non-existent, and the woman's actions can only be condemned from a moral point of view at best.
However, because the woman is at fault, the evidence is conclusive, and the facts are clear, it is basically certain that the woman will leave the house at the time of divorce.
Is this the end of it?
Of course not, if it's as simple as going out of the house, it's too unfair to the man.
The author believes that the husband can claim from the woman and the biological father of the three children for the past 16 years, as well as various maintenance expenses, and claim corresponding compensation for moral damages.
Of course, the three children who were hurt the most in this matter were the three children, who called their father for more than ten years, became strangers overnight, and got along day and night for 16 years, although there is no blood relationship, but the feelings are real.
In the face of a disintegrated family, in the face of the culprit's mother, in the face of the "uncle" who has raised him for more than ten years, how should children face secular concepts?And how to deal with gossip!
These are the most important questions to consider next.
In this matter, the child is innocent and the object that needs to be protected the most, the adult's affairs cannot involve the child, netizens can criticize and condemn the woman, but the child cannot be involved.
In contrast, the child is also a victim, and the victim cannot be allowed to suffer a second injury.