Title:
"Why does the country want you to spend money, but you are still poor?”
In this era of prosperity, we are faced with a prominent problem: the state encourages people to consume, but the people are so poor that they can't even lift their pants. What's going on here?Let's uncover this seemingly simple but deep problem.
First of all, let's look at the country's policy, that set of tricks to reduce taxes and issue consumption vouchers, which seems to be beautiful, but in fact, the people have not more cash on hand. ** The encouragement seems to have failed, because in the past period, the income of ordinary people has not risen much, and some people's income has even declined. To get people to spend money, you first have to make sure they have money.
However, if you have money in your hands, will you really spend it?This is a fairly real problem. People spend money and are always willing to spend it on what is valuable to them, not just because they have the final say. Encouraging consumption is only one aspect, but it cannot fundamentally solve the problem. Let's face it: for people to spend, they need to feel a substantial increase in income, not just a virtual policy dividend.
Finally, we have to wonder why there is always an emphasis on encouraging everyone to spend money, rather than trying to raise people's incomesThis involves a deep-seated problem of economic development. In the country's secondary distribution, 40% of fiscal revenue is used for the salaries and benefits of civil servants, while the more than 1.3 billion Chinese can only share the remaining 60%. The annual income distributed to each ordinary person is only a few tens of yuan. In this case, the people are so poor that they can't even lift their pants, so how can they talk about consumption?
It's like a joke, ** shouting "spend money, activate the economy" on the side, while the common people are powerless to cope. With the metaphor of the image of "unaffordable pants", we can feel the sharpness and irony of the problem even more. **'s policy to encourage consumption seems to be positive, but if it does not solve the problem of deep-seated wealth disparity and income inequality, it is only treating the symptoms but not the root cause.
Only by looking beyond the surface and digging deep into the root cause of the problem can we find a solution. It is hoped that future policies will pay more attention to the actual needs of the people, rather than just staying at slogans and forms. Only on the basis of truly improving people's income and raising living standards can we form sustainable consumption growth and promote the truly healthy development of the economy.
Some people may think that these are theories, but in practice, such contradictions are not unfamiliar. In life, we will always encounter the contradiction that we know that we can't spend money indiscriminately, but we still can't help it when we have money in hand. It's like a twisted door that encourages you to move forward, but not many can really get through.
If we zoom in on the issue at the national level, it is not difficult to find similarities. The state encourages consumption and wants to stimulate the economy, but it ignores the premise that people can really afford to consume. This is akin to advising the poor to spend more without giving them actual support, which only exacerbates the contradictions.
On the road of economic development, we must not only see the glamour and prosperity on the surface, but also dig deep into the problems behind it. Behind the difficulty of mentioning the pants is the problem of the excessive gap between the rich and the poor in the entire social structure. Only by truly focusing on the basic needs of people can we build a more equitable and sustainable society.
Looking back at the whole article, we have lifted the veil of the problem step by step, from national policies to individual consumption, to the root cause of the gap between the rich and the poor. The difficulty of mentioning pants is not only a figurative statement, but also a vivid portrayal of the current economic contradictions and the gap between the rich and the poor. We can't help but wonder why we are always encouraging spending instead of focusing on raising people's incomes
The purpose of this article is to arouse readers' attention to social phenomena and guide them to think deeply about the problems existing in economic development. Only by understanding the essence of the problem and truly solving the crux of the problem can we move towards a healthier and more stable society. It's hard to mention, it's a real and powerful metaphor that echoes our questioning of the direction of the country's development. Perhaps it is through this colloquial and close-to-life expression that we can better arouse the public's thinking about social issues and encourage more people to pay attention to and participate in solving them.