Interesting associations
Ju Isaac. Chinese character writing is one of the most commonly used forms of expression expression by Chinese, and if there is artistic entry, it can also be called calligraphy creation. Norms are relatively non-standardized, since we want to talk about the norms for the use of words, and the fact that the use of words is not standardized, then, according to people's normal thinking, there can only be one kind of norms, and the rest are non-standardized. As for the standard, the standard is a scale, such as a trade-off, there is a crosshair, if it is not reached or even if it is more or less, even if it is a violation, it is not a standard. The function of Chinese characters is to convey information, and if Chinese characters are not standardized and standardized, they cannot convey accurate information, and the resulting errors may be thousands of miles away from the main idea. In this way, non-standard and non-standard Chinese characters will mislead people and things, and they cannot be listed.
So how should we make the writing of Chinese characters conform to the norms and standards, and convey the correct information?It is very clear that there must be normative parts and standard parts. These hardware have not been born, how to measure it?The press release said: "In particular, some fonts deliberately make vulgar and sloppy exaggerated distortions of the strokes and structures ......of Chinese characters"So, how do you determine that a word or a picture is deliberately done?Is there an accuracy for vulgar and sloppy exaggerated deformations?If there is, governance can be measured against that. Similar to vulgarity and sloppiness, it is no longer a form of short length and thickness that can be quantified externally, but a feeling of people, Zhang San has Zhang San's sense of vulgarity and sloppiness, and Li Si has another feeling. In particular, the word "deliberately", the meaning of people, casual, intentional, arbitrary, deliberate, unintentional, so many meanings, on what basis is it regarded as intentional when writing a word?How to determine, is it possible?For example, Fu Shan's cursive writing, so is it intentional to pull around?Xu Wei's cursive writing is messy and chaotic, is it sloppy?Later generations will learn the same, should they govern?Later generations took "Jiucheng Palace" as a model, and as a result, some words were more horizontal and less horizontal, a little more and a little less, which were in line with the norms and standards of the ancients but should not be in today's norms
The creation of calligraphers cannot be separated from social life, from ancient times to the present, calligraphers have written many practical products for the society, from the court to the people, the number is incalculable. For example, plaques, if measured by norms and standards, some do not conform to this, but they have a sense of beauty, so that they have been passed down for thousands of years. At the beginning of learning calligraphy, calligraphy lovers take the ancient books as their Xi goal, intending to exhaust the handwriting in it and achieve the ability to learn which one is like which. If the copybook is not a standard piece, it also makes what people learn from generation to generation are not standard parts, but non-standard but produce personality, beauty, and become a machine. Most of the Xi students who like art are formalists, and when adjusting the form of spatial movement, they will inevitably have more horizontal and less horizontal, like the ancients, and later generations will follow suit, and the information is not single and can convey richer and more vivid information. Cursive writing, for example, exaggerated and distorted makes it unpredictable, and it is driven by passion to speed quickly, and the information conveyed is not so-called correct, but inaccurate, uncertain, unpredictable, and ineffable. This also makes us feel that when we read cursive script, we feel the beauty of unbridled impermanence that does not conform to the norm, and does not pay attention to the standards and norms that are not tightly followed. In other words, the purpose of a person's indulgence is not to pursue standards and norms.
Therefore, there are many issues that will arise because of the advocacy of standards and norms, and it is worth discussing. I can't help but think that there is an artifact in the world that can measure the standards and norms of Chinese character writingIf there is, each person has an artifact, and we can easily operate it at any time when we select calligraphy works, when we are creating them, and in front of the thousands of market signs, so as to measure the two poles of right and wrong.