Since the DPRK successfully launched the reconnaissance satellite Wanlijing-1, the representatives of the DPRK, the ROK, and the United States have engaged in a heated debate at a meeting of the Security Council over this incident. However, the logic of the representative of the United States is very strange and full of many opinions and statements that do not conform to common sense.
Resident in the United StatesUnited NationsRepresentative Thomas Greenfield said at the meeting that the United States strongly opposes North Korea's claim that the missile launch was to defend and respond to the United States and South KoreaMilitary Xi。But when it comes to U.S. and South Korean Xi near the Korean Peninsula, she dismisses these public Xi as defensive and conventional. This logic is incomprehensible, can other countries be considered defensive as long as they publish the Xi?After all, for North Korea, these Xi are conducted on its doorstep.
Even more puzzling is the fact that the US representatives claim that they are willing to engage in dialogue without preconditions, as long as the DPRK accepts it. This statement raises questions about whether the representative of the United States has mistaken North Korea for South Korea and reprimanded it. In addition, the representative of the United States tried to take the statement of our representative out of context and then used it to attack the DPRK.
North Korea is permanentUnited NationsRepresentativesVenusAt the meeting complained that, on the one hand, the United States uses nuclearthreatens them, while on the other hand, when North Korea tries to develop, test, manufacture and possess the same as the United Statessystem, but to blame. The DPRK believes that such accusations are only made by the United States in pursuit of so-called absolute security.
However, there is no such thing as an absolute in the world, everything is relative. The United States pursues absolute security while ignoring the legitimate security concerns of other countries. If North Korea continues to feel threatened, their security problems will not be resolved, and the Korean Peninsula will not be able to truly get out of its security dilemma.
The views and logic of the representative of the United States are indeed puzzling. She selectively will be the United States and South KoreanMilitary XiDefined as defensive and misrepresented North Korea's actions of self-defense as acts of aggression. Such illogical positions and statements can only lead to a further escalation of tension on the Korean peninsula.
InInternationalIn their affairs, countries should seek common interests and ways to solve problems on the basis of equality and mutual respect. It is only through dialogue and consultation that long-term peace and security can be truly achieved. We should not put our own interests above the security of other countries and try to contain them by creating tensions.
For North Korea, they have to face not only domestic pressures and challenges, but also facesInternationalSocial pressure and blame. Under such circumstances, the DPRK needs to remain calm and reasonable, adhere to the principle of self-defense, and continue to seek a way to resolve the issue through dialogue and negotiation.
In short, the bizarre logic of the representative of the United States once again shows that some countries are dealing with itInternationalDouble standards and hegemonic thinking in affairs. Lasting peace and common development can be achieved only through genuine equality and mutual trust. The settlement of the Korean Peninsula issue requires the joint efforts of all parties, abandoning the practice of deliberately creating tensions, and contributing to regional peace and stability.