As the Israeli army continues its military operations against Gaza, the international community has increasingly questioned and criticized its actions. Despite the adoption by the UN General Assembly of a resolution calling for a ceasefire in Gaza, Israel has not complied. In addition, the Israeli army's operations in Gaza have also resulted in a large number of ** and disabilities. However, even in the face of such pressure and losses, the Israeli army still has no desire to ceasefire. Faced with this situation, we need to think seriously about why Israel insists on a non-stop fire in the Gaza conflict
Since the start of the ground operation in Gaza, 115 Israeli soldiers have reportedly been killed and 5,000 wounded, 2,000 of whom have become disabled. These disabilities not only cause great losses to individuals and troops, but also make the Israeli army's military operations more difficult. Among the many battle-damaged officers, Colonel Bassat was the highest-ranking Israeli officer killed in battle. These losses are not just grim numbers, but also pain and grief behind every family. This makes us have to think again about whether it is worth continuing the military operation in exchange for these costs
Israel's actions in the Gaza conflict have aroused widespread concern and condemnation from the international community. The international community has not only questioned the Israeli army's military action, but also regretted its non-compliance with UN General Assembly resolutions. Many countries, including Israel's allies, have also begun to express concern about Israel's behavior and have called for a ceasefire or adjustment of actions. Even the United States ** Biden has made the harshest remarks against Israel, warning that the Israeli bombing will deprive Israel of international support for its war against Hamas. These criticisms and doubts have seriously damaged Israel's international image, and even Israel's allies have begun to diverge in their support for it.
First, a ceasefire can reduce the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza. Gaza is currently facing a humanitarian crisis, with a large number of civilians** and the destruction of infrastructure that has left the people living in severe hardship. A ceasefire could provide the necessary conditions for the delivery and relief of humanitarian assistance and reduce the suffering of the population.
Secondly, Israel should abide by the resolutions of the United Nations General Assembly. As a member of the United Nations, Israel has a responsibility to abide by United Nations resolutions and lead by example. Failure to comply with the resolution will only damage Israel's reputation and standing in the international community and will not bring any benefits.
Thirdly, a ceasefire can create opportunities for the peace process. The conflict will only exacerbate hostility between the two sides and make peace negotiations more difficult. Through a ceasefire, the two sides can return to the negotiating table, resolve their differences through dialogue, and work together to find a peaceful solution to the conflict.
From the above analysis, it can be seen that the continuation of Israel's military operations is not justified. Despite the military superiority of the Israeli army, its losses and the doubts of the international community show that military means will not solve the problem. We should advocate for a peaceful negotiated solution to the conflict in order to reduce people's suffering and losses. The international community should also play an active role in inducing Israel to cease its military operations and to move the peace process forward. It is only through peace that long-term stability and win-win results can be achieved.