WedgesYesterday, a friend came to me to ask me about the evaluation of senior engineers。It can be seen that she is a little confused, she wants to prepare but does not know how to "exert herself". Although I talked to her a lot yesterday, she didn't think she had spoken thoroughly. So I promised to write an article and see if I couldLet's talk about my perception of this matter a little more systematically, I hope to bring some help to her and other friends who are preparing to evaluate the title. The following content is very subjective, and it was "realized" by Liangzi when he evaluated the job title herself。I was rated as a deputy high ten years ago, but in the past 10 years, because I am not in a state-owned enterprise, and there are no decent works, it is basically hopeless to spell "Zhenggao", so I don't want to toss. Why do I have this realization? Here's my analysis, and I hope it can give you some inspiration.
QueueThe evaluation of job titles is essentially a question of how many people are in line to get the top names。So, what you have to do as an examiner is to try to get as high as you can in the rankings. Do you need to be number one? Of course not. Thinking about it this way, isn't your psychological burden a little less? In our annual selection, the quota is a fixed value, and you will only be rated if you are weighted by various indicators and ranked in this fixed value. Probably this passage, some people sound nonsense. And I'm doing itIt is to dissuade some candidates。If your work unit is average (mainly private enterprises that do not enter the stream), and you have not been able to be registered for so many years, and you have not won any awards, you still spend money to find someone. Then you don't have to be the denominator, save all this money and have a good meal, isn't it!
As I said earlier, I have this understanding of the evaluation of "Zhenggao". In fact, my age has already arrived, and many of my classmates are already in high school. But based on my understanding of the evaluation of job titles, I also "broke off this idea". 
HardwareMany things in life are a process of "accumulation", not that if you want to work hard today, it can be achieved overnight。In fact, the same is true for evaluating job titles. Although the final result you will see is: a good or a bad one. But thisThe result is a positive feedback on the process for a long time ahead of you, rather than a "feedback" on how many days before you rate the sprint。Therefore, I advise those friends who have the idea of evaluating job titles to be conscientious every day, instead of "the boat will go straight to the bridge".
So what do we need to prepare? In fact, the materials that the judge system asks you to submit are what you have to prepare. Well, it sounds like a crap again. Your graduation certificate
If you graduated from a prestigious school, would you score more? As Zhang Xuefeng said, how can any Fortune 500 company go to Qiqihar University to recruit workers? The selection of professional titles also has a chain of contempt for academic qualifications.
Your place of workIf you are a state-owned compound or a world-renowned firm, will you score a little more? Of course, when you get into these systems, they've proven to be excellent. These units are an endorsement of you, and many judges are old mages of these units, do you say they will be inclined to you?
Your projectIf you've been working on big projects over the years, and you're still the main team member in it, will you score a little more? Of course it will, it's more convincing than if you draw the stairs every day in Tianhua. Your awardsIf you have participated in a project that has won a "golden" award, or even a commendation for yourself, will you score a little more? This is self-evident, and this is also an endorsement. If you are as good as you, you can't get a job title, is it impossible to let the young man who does the "doorman" design every day be a senior engineer, right?
Your ** situationIf your ** is published in a heavyweight journal and is known by many people, will it score a little more?
I think it's better than you spending money to find someone to send it on your behalf, and give the judges an impression, right?
Which of the above materials can be achieved overnight? If you study hard for more than 10 years, you may not be able to go to a prestigious school; If you work the project for n years, you may not be able to win the award; If you don't have a lot of project accumulation, how can you produce the best results?
Everything is made up of time。If you have "herded" sheep in front of you, then there are only not so many competitors who are expected to be you, or the quota index is relatively abundant.
But this is clearly unrealistic, right nowMany state-owned compounds also have a rating rate of only 60 percent。If you are a perennial "herding sheep" idle clouds and wild cranes, how many chances do you think you have? 
PresenceBill Clinton was a speaker who impressed me. The speech was well-organized, vivid and humorous, and he interacted with the audience from time to time, which was very infectious and unforgettable. The same goes for our job title selection process"Defense" is such a link. The evaluation is about the participant's participation in the project and the actual role it has played in it. 
ActuallyWhich of our judges is not a "fire eye", as long as you simply communicate with you, you can basically master your business ability.
So in this link, in fact, every participant can prepare well. What the judges want to know (ask questions) is nothing more than the following:
1.Is there a general purpose for the topic you are submitting? Do you have an innovative solution?
Because any of our ** is a paradigm of "raising a problem, analyzing a problem, and solving a problem". If you write your own **, you can't justify yourself, then how can you prove your ability? And how can the judges give you a score?
2.CommentIs the text relevant to your work practice? Tell us about some of your experiences in practice? Only when there is something to say will it be convincing. Project practice is a compulsory course for architects every day, if you can confidently tell the judges about the relevance and necessity of your work, I think it is difficult for the judges not to give you praise. When you become an expert in a certain subdivision, if you can't get a job title, do you think it's appropriate?
3.In addition to **, in fact, the judges want to know you as a personOne is serious and responsible; Speak confidently, neither humble nor arrogant; Who doesn't love someone who is polite and humble in their dealings with others? The process of defending is actually a condensation。It is a reflection of how hard you work every day, actively prepare**, and take the judges' questions seriously. 
The time for the defense is very short, try to make good use of every question raised by the judges, and actively market yourself! And the longer the judges talk to you, the more "charismatic" you are. 
Wrapping upOf course, there will be some shortcuts to evaluating job titles。For example, entering some well-known state-owned academies, or studying under certain masters. ButTitle is not "everything" of life, even if you don't have any job title, it doesn't prevent you from having a "good future". And my article is just for these friends who need to evaluate the title, I hope to help you "confused". The future is bright, but the road is tortuous. WhileMaster a certain formula**, coupled with long-termism, the goal must be achievableOne person cheers for the graduate school entrance examination