Once upon a time, low-difficult, low-wage jobs such as supermarket tally clerks, convenience store salesmen, and factory product quality inspectors in cities became the target of urban people's pursuit, while migrant workers stayed away from these jobs. What is the cause of this seemingly abnormal phenomenon?
In the past, we often had the impression of migrant workers and city dwellers as representatives of the dirty, low-level people, and that they would accept the dirty work that city dwellers were unwilling to do. This cognitive bias stems from the social perception of a few decades ago, when migrant workers were indeed limited to manual labor in the cities.
Thirty years ago, the rural economy was lagging behind, and farmers lacked the opportunity to learn Xi social skills, so they could only rely on farming for their livelihoods, and their incomes were meager. Urbanites have a better chance of getting an education and working in knowledge-based jobs. As a result, urban dwellers often choose more decent and higher-paying jobs, while migrant workers are relegated to hard manual labor, paying the most and getting the lowest income.
With the progress of society and the development of the rural economy, the status of migrant workers has also changed. The rural economy has diversified and developed, and farmers are no longer dependent on agriculture alone, but more industries have emerged. Migrant workers no longer passively choose manual labor in the city, but have more opportunities to choose the jobs they are good at.
Migrant workers are no longer just "leak pickers" in the city, they improve their social skills through various ways, and some even become small traders in the city, short creators, or sell agricultural products through live broadcasts. Migrant workers are no longer limited to manual labor, but have found more ways to make money through innovative ways.
The rise of the rural economy has further improved rural living conditions, promoted the improvement of infrastructure, improved education and increased employment opportunities. The children of farmers have more options and are no longer limited to manual labor. The rise of industries around the countryside has led to characteristic tourism, farm stays, homestays, etc., further narrowing the gap between urban and rural areas.
City dwellers have also begun to value their quality of life, choosing to abandon high-paying manual labor in favor of relatively light jobs. The advantages of migrant workers are more prominent in the field of manual labor, so they are more popular in the labor market. Migrant workers have more opportunities to choose and can be more rational in their demands on wages and work intensity.
For migrant workers, earning more income is the main goal they pursue. With limited options, they prefer to engage in manual labor, as this type of work usually pays more. On the other hand, people in the city pay more attention to the dignity of work and the comfort of life, and are more inclined to choose relatively easy positions with an eight-hour work system.
Urban people are relatively inferior in terms of manual labor, so they often choose to give up in the competition and look for jobs that better suit their needs. Migrant workers show greater endurance and dedication at work, making them more attractive to employers.
Behind the position of migrant workers with a monthly income of 3,000 yuan is the different choices of urban people and migrant workers in terms of cognition, opportunities and needs. With the rise of the rural economy and the diversified development of migrant workers, the gap between urban and rural areas has gradually narrowed, and migrant workers have also got rid of the past predicament and moved towards a broader space for development. The difference between urban people and migrant workers is no longer a simple struggle between physical and mental strength, but to find their own development path in the process of social development.
Migrant workers earn 3,000 yuan a month: a hidden treasure that urban people are vying to grab", which profoundly reveals a phenomenon in the urban and rural labor markets, and triggers people's deep thinking about social development, cognitive biases and labor choices.
First, through the analysis of cognitive biases, the paper reveals people's stereotypes of migrant workers and urban people. This cognitive bias is rooted in the specific historical context of social development in the past few decades, and gives people the impression that migrant workers are naturally inferior. However, the article mentions that this stereotype has not been adjusted with the changes in the rural economy, making it difficult for people to adapt to the new roles and choices of migrant workers.
Secondly, by analyzing the new era of migrant workers, this paper emphasizes the transformation of migrant workers in social development. With the diversification of the rural economy and the upgrading of migrant workers' skills, they are no longer limited to manual labor, but have opened up more ways to make money through various innovative ways. This provides more possibilities for the development of migrant workers, and also allows them to gradually transform from urban "leak pickers" to workers with the right to choose.
The rise of the rural economy has not only improved the living conditions of peasants, but also narrowed the gap between urban and rural areas. The article mentions the rise of characteristic tourism, farm stays, homestays, etc., which have made the rural economy more diversified and provided more employment opportunities for farmers. This trend has led to a gradual convergence of the lifestyles of urban and migrant workers, and the gap between urban and rural areas has gradually narrowed.
Finally, the paper analyzes the different paths of urban people and migrant workers in terms of labor choice. Migrant workers are more interested in earning more income and are therefore more willing to engage in manual labor, while urban people are more interested in the dignity of work and the comfort of life, and are more inclined to choose easy jobs. This different demand determines the different types of jobs they choose in the labor market.
Overall, this article reveals a complex and realistic social phenomenon through in-depth analysis and argumentation. The position of migrant workers with a monthly income of 3,000 yuan is not only their choice, but also the abandonment of urban people, which reflects the evolution of social structure and cognitive concepts. This provokes reflection on social development and labor values, while also reminding us to go beyond stereotypes and understand the diversity and complexity of different groups. This article provides us with an opportunity to think deeply about the differences between urban and rural areas, as well as the trade-offs and trade-offs between individuals in their labor choices.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!