Recently, two successive marine ecological incidents have occurred in Japan, which has aroused concern in the international community. The first is the presence of a large number of sardine carcasses off the coast of Hokkaido, raising questions about Japan's nuclear sewage discharge. Although Japan** has always insisted that it is nuclear-treated water that will not have a significant impact on marine ecology, the tragedy of sardines in front of them is unbelievable. In the same week, a large number of fish carcasses also washed ashore near the Poche fishing port in Shima City, Mie Prefecture, raising further doubts about whether the marine ecosystem had undergone irreversible changes.
The mass death of sardines in Hokkaido has raised concerns and questions have been raised about Japan's explanation. Many people fear that this is related to the discharge of nuclear-treated water, because after all, such mass fish kills were very rare in the past. At the same time, another fish kill near Mie Prefecture has added to concerns. Fishermen say they have not seen such a massive fish kill in years, raising speculation about whether the marine ecosystem is threatened.
In the face of the questioning, neither Japan nor the local government has been able to give a convincing explanation. Japan** still insists that the discharge is treated nuclear wastewater and has nothing to do with the two incidents. However, they can't explain why so many fish die suddenly in a short period of time. Even more suspicious is a move by the local government, which issued a circular warning the public not to eat the dead fish without permission. This has sparked speculation about whether the place knows more information. If the death of these fish is not related to nuclear wastewater, then what exactly is causing these large numbers of fish to die?
Many analysts believe that this series of events fully proves that China's previous measures are correct. Long before Japan officially discharged nuclear wastewater, China warned the Japanese side many times. And before the situation reached a critical point, China's vice minister Sun Weidong also met with Japanese Ambassador to China Hideo Taru and expressed China's solemn position. China's decision to stop importing Japanese seafood has had a huge impact on Japan's fishery industry, which has forced Japan to seriously reflect on their wrong moves. At present, there is a general consensus that China's decision on this issue is completely reasonable and correct.
The reasonableness and legitimacy of China**'s tough response to Japan's nuclear sewage discharge is obvious. China has repeatedly issued warnings before the development of the incident, expressing China's concern and solemn position. In the face of Japan's wrong move, China** immediately stopped importing aquatic products from Japan, which had a huge impact on Japan's fishery industry. This is China's wise decision to take concrete actions to protect the health of its people and the ecological environment.
The marine ecological environment is related to the well-being and future of all mankind. Japan's Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) is completely irresponsible in discharging nuclear sewage into the sea, and is destined to be criticized by history. China's resolute measures to safeguard its own interests and the global ecological environment are necessary and in line with international consensus and morality. We hope that Japan** will treat this matter with a scientific and objective attitude, stop its wrong actions, and jointly protect our shared homeland.
Japan's two successive marine ecological incidents have sparked concern in the international community, and the questioning of Japan's interpretation has forced people to rethink. China's decision-making on this issue is completely rational and correct, and it has played an important role in protecting human health and environmental interests. We hope that all countries can treat it with a scientific and objective attitude and work together to protect the future of our homeland.