After the third exam of the 2024 National Master's Admission Examination, there was a heated discussion on the hot search list on Weibo about "postgraduate mathematics". Candidates are evaluating the math questions, but what do they think of the math part of the exam?
There are many hot topics about mathematics for graduate school entrance examinations on the hot search list, which is surprising. This raises the question of the number of exams.
1. Number. Second, the number three and the difficulty of the 396 economics joint entrance examination are hotly discussed
One can't help but wonder how the candidates evaluate these math questions. Candidates have expressed their opinions on math questions on the Internet. Some candidates said that the number one multiple-choice question did well
But filling in the blanks and big questions are difficult;Others said they couldn't count a single question, which made them feel exhausted from the year's effort. For the Math 2 exam, some candidates find the questions to be very difficult
Others find the topic relatively simple. As for the number three candidates, they shouted: "The number three is simply a living calculator!.""Most test takers said that scratch paper was simply not enough and that each question required a lot of calculations.
The candidates of the 396 economics joint examination also said that the amount of questions and calculations is quite huge, and some people even joked: "Does 396 refer to the 3 of the triathlon or the 3 of the number three." "Mathematics as a subject that can widen the score gap
The level of difficulty in the minds of different candidates is evaluated. Changes in the difficulty of the exam may also lead to fluctuations in the national line. Therefore, despite the increasing difficulty of mathematics, we still need to stabilize our mindset and strive to excel in the professional exams. Pass this exam,
We can see that candidates have different opinions on math questions. This also makes people wonder how the difficulty of the math questions in the exam affects the mentality and performance of the candidates
Will future test evaluation criteria be able to more fairly assess the abilities of different candidates?With the number of applicants for the college entrance examination and postgraduate entrance examination increasing year by year, the difficulty and fairness of mathematics exams have attracted much attention. Perhaps it can be done more scientifically
Reasonable proposition method to better and accurately assess the candidate's mathematical level and improve the fairness of the test. So, what do you think can be done to address the issue of difficulty and fairness in math tests?
welcome to le**e your comments below!