There are many treasures of ancient Chinese science and technology, including the Book of Lubanqi, Strange Tricks, Wooden Ox and Flowing Horse, and Zhang Heng's geodynamic instrument. However, the true function of this black technology has been questioned by some scientists and defined as pseudoscience. An academician of the Chinese Academy of Sciences was even more blunt in his criticism, even thinking that it was better to hang a piece of pork on the beams of the house. Why is there such skepticism?Let's have a hard time.
Zhang Heng: An ancient multi-talented genius.
According to the Book of the Later Han Dynasty, Zhang Heng was not only good at ingenuity, but also focused on astronomical lunisolar calendrical calculations. During the Eastern Han Dynasty, he was known as a writer, a geographer, an expert in astronomy and mathematics, and an inventor. Among them, his invention of the geodynamic instrument has attracted widespread attention. The invention was made of tempered brass and was engraved with patterns and words from the time. Inside the geodynamic instrument, there is a pillar with 8 traps on the side, and a dragon carved on the periphery, each with copper beads in its mouth, and a copper toad with its mouth open. Theoretically, if ** happens around, the geokinetic instrument will be activated, and the dragon ball will roll down into the toad's mouth, symbolizing the arrival of **.
The fog behind the science.
However, research shows that Zhang Heng's geodynamic instrument disappeared around 200 AD. Therefore, what has been handed down may only be a model or concept. So, how did the geodynamic instrument in the early textbooks come about?It turned out that this was a fake created by Wang Zhenduo, the director of the museum of the Cultural Relics Bureau at that time. Curator Wang once flipped through the ancient books about the geodynamic instrument and imitated a geokinetic instrument. Subsequently, the news of Wang Zhenduo's restoration of the geodynamic instrument spread all over the country, and this imitation entered the textbooks of primary and secondary schools across the country.
The modern controversy: the battle between the truth and the fake of the geodynamic instrument.
With the development of the Internet, a person named Fang Zizhou questioned this geodynamic instrument on the Internet, saying that it was purely an ornament and had no function of detecting ** at all. He even raised serious doubts about the detection ability of Zhang Heng's original geodynamic instrument. This remark caused an uproar, and Fu Chengyi, an academician of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, also responded, bluntly saying that this kind of geodynamic instrument is not as practical as hanging a piece of meat on the beam. As the discussion heated up, geokinetic was dismissed as pseudoscience and was soon removed from textbooks.
Zhang Heng's great creativity.
However, in ancient books, the evaluation of Zhang Heng is multifaceted. "The Biography of Zhang Heng" and "Miscellaneous Poems" recorded: "I advise the heavenly prince to be vigorous and reduce talents without sticking to one pattern." This is a high praise for Zhang Heng as a rare talent. Whether his original geodynamic instrument can detect the first omen in advance is now impossible to investigate. But regardless of whether the function of the geodynamic instrument stopped at theory, or whether it really played a detection role in the Eastern Han Dynasty, at least its appearance proves the outstanding creativity of the ancient Chinese people, and also proves that Zhang Heng is an inventive genius.
Conclusion: The mysteries of ancient technology are still to be revealed.
Ancient Chinese black technology, especially Zhang Heng's geokinetic instrument, is still a topic full of mysteries. The scientific community still debates its true performance, and the perception of ancient technology is constantly evolving. Regardless of authenticity, Zhang Heng's geodynamic instrument is a representative of ancient Chinese science and technology, and its existence and disappearance are a wonderful chapter in the history of science and technology.
* The splendor and controversy of ancient Chinese technology.
This article on Zhang Heng's geodynamic instrument is thought-provoking and provides an in-depth analysis of the splendor and controversy of ancient technology. Ancient China is remarkable for its unique civilization and technological achievements, and Zhang Heng's geodynamic instrument has become one of the most controversial representatives of this history.
First of all, starting from historical documents, the article introduces Zhang Heng as a versatile wizard and his outstanding contributions in the field of astronomy, lunisolar calendrical calculation, etc. This background makes Zhang Heng's geodynamic instrument even more mysterious and intriguing. However, the authors do not shy away from the questioning and controversy that geokinetic instruments have been subjected to, especially the controversial definition that has been defined as pseudoscience. This objective presentation presents the challenges and criticisms of ancient technology, allowing the reader to look at the pros and cons more fully when thinking about the achievements of ancient technology.
Secondly, this paper reveals the fact that the geodynamic instrument disappeared and the production of fakes through research. This makes us wonder about the gap between historical documents and the actual situation, and just how authentic the achievements of ancient science and technology really are. Although the geodynamic instrument had a place in the textbooks of the time, with the development of the modern network, doubts and doubts about its function quickly spread. This has sparked a debate about the authenticity of ancient technology, challenging our traditional view of ancient technological achievements.
Third, the article has an in-depth discussion of the controversy of geodynamic instruments in modern times. The voices of Fang Zizhou and Fu Chengyi, an academician of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, highlight the differences and debates in the field of science and technology. Fang Zizhou questioned the function of the geodynamic instrument, and Fu Chengyi bluntly said that it was not as practical as hanging a piece of meat. This controversy not only reveals the limitations of ancient science and technology in the eyes of modern science, but also suggests that we should look at ancient scientific and technological achievements with a more critical eye, and not simply revel in their brilliance.
Finally, the article concludes by mentioning that the mystery of ancient Chinese technology is still to be revealed. This is a thought-provoking question and a lesson for future research. The question of the authenticity of ancient science and technology is not only the direction of academic research, but also a challenge for our understanding of ancient civilization and technology. How to find the truth of history in the controversy and how to treat the achievements of ancient science and technology will become challenges faced by the academic community and the public in the future.
In general, this article vividly shows the brilliance and controversy of ancient science and technology through the analysis of Zhang Heng's geodynamic instrument. Through historical research, modern controversies, and in-depth reflections on ancient technology, readers can gain a more comprehensive understanding of the complexity and multifaceted nature of ancient technology. This also stimulates us to think more deeply about ancient science and technology, and makes us more cherish and examine the position of ancient science and technology in the process of human civilization.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!