DurantwithCurryAs a player over 35 years old, he still maintains an amazing level. Although on full-time dataDurantThe performance was better, but in the play of key moments,DurantBut it's not as goodCurry。This article will analyze the performance gap between the two people at key moments from various dimensions, and the reasons for it.
DurantPlayed 16 games with key moments this season, but only managed a 6-10 record. Here's whyDurantShooting inefficiently at critical moments is too low. He made a total of 49 shots in key moments in those 16 games, but only hit 17 of them, a shooting percentage of just 347%。among othersThree-point shotThere were only 3 hits, and the hit rate was as low as 231%。Although the free-throw shooting percentage reached 905%, but that doesn't hide its inefficiency in shooting in crunch time. In addition,DurantThe rebounds, assists, steals, and blocks in key moments were not bad, but there were more turnovers, with a total plus/minus of -16.
And based on these statistics, we can see:DurantThere is a real problem with shooting efficiency in critical moments, and this is alsoSunsA big reason to lose at a critical moment. This is further reflectedDurantThe problem that had been there for years was that his stamina gradually decreased in the fourth quarter, resulting in a noticeable drop in efficiency.
withDurantcomparatively,CurryThe performance is much better when it matters most. This season he has played 20 games with crunch moments, with a record of 12 wins and 8 losses, which is a clear leadDurant。Statistics show that in the pivotal moments of these 20 games,CurryIn total, he made 51 shots and hit 26 of them, a whopping 51 percent shooting. EspeciallyThree-point shotThe performance was even more eye-catching, with 31 hitsThree-point shot, with a hit rate of 484%。In addition, he shot 96% from the free-throw line, which is also an important guarantee for his scoring consistency in key moments. At the same time,CurryThe performance in rebounds, assists, steals and other aspects at key moments is also quite good, and the number of turnovers is controlled within 5, with a total plus/minus of 30.
In summary,CurryThe performance at the critical moment is significantly betterDurant。His shooting skills and consistency showed great competitiveness at this stage. withDurantThe difference is,CurryThere was no significant drop in stamina at critical moments, allowing him to maintain an efficient shooting performance.
By passingDurantwithCurryComparing and analyzing the performance in key moments, we can conclude that although there is a certain gap between the two in the full-time data, in the performance at key moments,CurrySignificantly thanDurantBetter, with higher shooting efficiency and consistency. WhileDurantThere was a bit of a drop in stamina, which led to poor performance in the final moments of the race.
This conclusion also led me to think about the career development of athletes. Later in their careers, as they age and their physical strength declines, their level of competition and performance tend to decline. However, as suchCurryIt has been shown that, through the honing of skill and the love of the game, athletes can still show exceptional ability and determination in key moments. At the same time, for likeDurantSuch players need to manage and adjust their physical strength better to maintain a high level of performance at the end of the game.
In summary,CurrywithDurantThe gap was given at a critical moment. Despite the fact that both of them areSuperstar, but later in his career,CurryThrough his own efforts and skills, he has become an excellent player who can deal with critical moments, whileDurantYou need to make adjustments in your physical management and improve your shooting efficiency to better help your team win.