Rural homesteads are withdrawn for compensation
The background and practical significance of the research on the paid withdrawal system of rural homestead in China.
In the context of China's "three rural" policy, China's "three rural" problems are becoming increasingly prominent. A major experiment that is currently being carried out in China is the paid withdrawal of rural homesteads. In order to effectively deal with the problems of rural homesteads being idle and overrun, and ensure the rational use of homesteads, guide farmers to withdraw from homesteads in an orderly and paid manner in accordance with the law. The implementation of the rural tax and fee system is of great significance to the vast number of peasant households, and it is necessary to understand it in a timely manner. Recently, there have been rumors that "each household can receive up to 1.5 million yuan" for demolition and resettlement housing, which has aroused concerns from all walks of life.
The current homestead use right transfer system in China is mainly to effectively resolve the phenomenon of "idleness" and "overrun" of rural homesteads in China, promote the intensive development of farmland in China, and promote rural revitalization. Through the independent transfer of homesteads, farmers have realized the effective circulation of homestead use rights. In addition, through the circulation of rural homesteads, it is conducive to accelerating the process of urbanization and improving their quality of life and development opportunities.
At the same time, however, China is still facing many problems and challenges. First of all, due to the different standards of land acquisition, demolition and resettlement, the amount of land acquisition compensation received by land-expropriated farmers in the process of land acquisition is not the same, and it is difficult to fully realize the rights and interests of farmers in land acquisition and demolition. Second, the loss of dependence on land resources by the elderly in rural areas has increased their pressure, which has accelerated the movement of rural population. In addition, there are still a large number of conflicts of interest in the process of paid use of rural land, such as land circulation and division, and the lack of appropriate compensation for some land-expropriated farmers.
This paper argues that there are many problems in the current paid withdrawal system of homestead in China, such as the interests of farmers, land price, and unbalanced regional development. In view of China's current reform measures of "paid withdrawal of homesteads", it is necessary not only to protect the rights and interests of rural households, but also to promote rural revitalization, and to ensure the fairness, fairness and sustainability of the reform. On this basis, through policy support, farmers are encouraged to take the initiative to seek new development opportunities. Only in this way can the paid withdrawal system of rural homesteads in China play a greater role and promote the implementation of the "rural revitalization" strategy.
Different problems in the paid withdrawal of rural homesteads in China.
Due to the differences in land price levels across the country, the compensation standards for the paid withdrawal of rural homesteads are also different. In Jinshan District, Shanghai, the "Implementation Opinions" stipulate that farmers who meet the conditions, meet the conditions, and are willing to leave the cultivated land will be given a homestead (land) compensation of 1.5 million yuan per mu to eligible farmers in accordance with the regulations, but a maximum of 500,000 yuan will be given to the farmers who have been expropriated. Although the subsidy of 1.5 million yuan seems to be a lot, there are really not many farmers in places like Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Shenzhen.
In addition, Wuyi County in Zhejiang Province is a pilot area for the reform of China's rural collective land system, and its level of land acquisition, demolition, relocation and resettlement is low. According to the relevant policies of the county, the compensation fee for land acquisition is 350,000 yuan, equivalent to 525 yuan square meters. In order to get 1.5 million yuan in compensation for demolition and relocation, it is necessary to have more than four hectares of land, which is difficult to achieve in reality. However, Wuyi County has proposed a 40,000 yuan per household to require, which has given farmers in these places some benefits.
In addition, in Wuyuan County, Inner Mongolia, the cost of land acquisition, demolition and resettlement is relatively low. According to the policy of the relevant local departments, the area of the house is calculated at 300 square meters, and the pigsty, cowshed, and other supporting facilities are calculated at 100 square meters, which is much lower than the standard in other places. Even if there is a hectare of land on a piece of land, it is at most 200,000 yuan.
Through the analysis of the system of paid withdrawal of rural land in China, it is found that there are great differences in the provisions of the system of paid withdrawal of land in various places. The reason for this lies in the level of economic development, the supply and demand of land, the market, etc. Therefore, the statement of "1.5 million yuan per household" is not necessarily universal, and the majority of rural households must have an understanding of the local policies and compensation standards when handling the paid withdrawal of land.
Analysis of the pros and cons of the paid withdrawal system of rural homesteads.
The current homestead use right transfer system in China has been beneficially explored, but there are also some drawbacks.
At the level of profit, the paid withdrawal of homestead land can effectively alleviate the outstanding problems of rural homestead idleness and large-scale exceedance, promote the intensive and efficient development of rural land, and promote rural economic and social development. Through the independent transfer of homesteads, farmers have realized the effective circulation of homestead use rights. In addition, the transfer of rural homesteads is also conducive to promoting the flow of rural population and urban integration, and improving the quality of life and development opportunities of rural residents.
However, at present, China's homestead paid withdrawal system is still facing many problems and problems. First of all, the difference in land acquisition, demolition and resettlement has resulted in insufficient compensation for demolition and relocation received by some land-expropriated farmers, and the rights and interests of landless farmers cannot be fully realized. Second, the loss of land income by landless peasants has led to a rapid decline in the rural population, which has further aggravated the problem of rural aging. In addition, there are still a large number of conflicts of interest in the process of paid use of rural land, such as land circulation, division of property rights, and the inability of some peasant households to receive due compensation.
In short, in order to effectively deal with the problems of "idleness", "overrun" and "overrun" of rural homesteads in China, it is a major issue in the field of "three rural" in China to promote the construction of "saving land". In the process of transferring the right to contract and manage rural land, the land income received by peasant households is also different. At present, the research on the paid withdrawal system of rural homesteads in China is still in its infancy, but there are still many problems and challenges. In the process of promoting the reform of rural taxes and fees, it is necessary to give full consideration to the rights and interests of peasant households and improve the relevant supporting mechanisms to ensure the fairness, fairness, and sustainability of the reform. On this basis, through policy support, farmers are encouraged to take the initiative to seek new development opportunities. Only in this way can the paid withdrawal system of rural homesteads in China play a greater role and promote the implementation of the "rural revitalization" strategy.