Public security work is a profession that is both challenging and responsible. Although the general public impression of the police is that they arrest criminals and interrogate them, in reality, the difficulty of public security work lies not in this link, but in the various evaluation tasks imposed by superiors. Below, I'll elaborate on this problem and ** some solutions.
First of all, the difficulty of public security work lies in the frequent evaluation tasks. In order to improve the effectiveness of their work and ensure the quality of their ranks, public security organs often formulate a series of evaluation indicators and tasks, and require the people's police to complete them within the specified time. These evaluation tasks will not only bring great pressure to the work of the civilian police, but may also lead to the inability to give full play to their personal abilities and experience.
Second, the difficulty of public security work lies in the complexity of the evaluation task. The evaluation indicators are often very cumbersome, including the number of cases handled, the number of criminal suspects arrested, and the submission of various reporting materials. These tasks require not only a great deal of time and energy from civilian police, but also a wealth of professional knowledge and skills. Due to the variety of tasks, it is often difficult for the people's police to truly investigate criminal incidents in depth and improve the quality of case handling while they are busy with the task of evaluating and evaluating crimes.
Finally, the difficulty of public security work lies in a series of problems that may arise from the evaluation task. Some civilian police officers may have to sacrifice their rest time and family life for the sake of evaluation, resulting in a disrupted work-family balance. In addition, the time-limited requirements of evaluation tasks may make it impossible for the police to fully carry out investigation and investigation work, thus preventing them from obtaining important evidence and clues, and affecting the quality of case handling.
In the face of these difficulties, we should use scientific and reasonable methods to find solutions. First of all, the public security organs need to set up evaluation indicators more scientifically and combine quantitative and qualitative targets, so that the people's police will no longer pursue "swiping numbers" too much, but pay more attention to the effectiveness and quality of case handling. Second, the public security organs should appropriately reduce the number and complexity of the assessment tasks, give the people's police more time and energy to investigate criminal incidents, and improve the quality of case handling. In addition, the public security organs should also establish systems and mechanisms conducive to the work-life balance of the people's police, encourage the people's police to strengthen their learning, Xi training, and exchanges, improve their overall quality, and better cope with the challenges of various evaluation tasks.
In summing up, the difficulty of public security work lies not in the interrogation after arrest, but in the various evaluation tasks that have been pressed down by the superiors. These evaluation tasks have brought tremendous pressure to the work of the police officers, limited their time and energy in investigating cases, and may affect the quality of case handling. In order to cope with these difficulties, the public security organs should adopt scientific and rational methods, set reasonable evaluation indicators, reduce the number and complexity of evaluation tasks, and establish systems and mechanisms to promote the balance between the work and life of the people's police and improve the effectiveness and quality of police work.