In recent years, China's economy has developed rapidly, and the number of private cars has surged, however, as a high-risk means of transportation, the driving behavior of private cars has attracted much attention. Among the broad regulations, the most controversial is the parking courtesy and pedestrian rule. Some believe that it should be retained as an expression of the quality of civilization;Others advocate abolishing it, advocating following the principle of "whoever is wrong pays" and opposing blind comity. This topic has sparked heated debate.
Accelerating Urbanization: A Management Crisis Caused by the Uneven Hierarchy of Civilizations.
China's urbanization process is accelerating, however, the level of civilization shows an uneven trend. Previously, traffic management was biased in favor of motor vehicles, resulting in the widespread phenomenon of "Chinese-style road crossing". Ignoring traffic lights is commonplace, which not only affects traffic order, but also makes it easier to cause accidents. In order to resolve this dilemma, "parking courtesy" regulations for private cars have become necessary. However, the current situation may be about to change, and the advice of experts has been recognized, and car owners have agreed that the change is long overdue.
Managing Change: Move Away from Focusing on Motor Vehicles.
First, there has been a significant change in management. In the past, traffic management was mainly for motor vehicles, but in recent years it has changed dramatically. Nowadays, not only motor vehicles, but also electric vehicles and pedestrians are regulated, and once they violate the rules, they will be dealt with with fines, and the violators will have to pay for their mistakes. This comprehensive management has gradually reduced the number of violations such as running red lights, making the original meaningful "parking courtesy" regulations increasingly insignificant, and even calling for their abolition.
Improving the level of civilization: the co-shaping of road civilization and education.
Secondly, the improvement of civilization has also provided support for the abolition of the "parking courtesy" rule. The quality of civilization is not innate, and it needs to be constantly educated and promoted. In the past, some people developed bad Xi such as spitting on the road, but in recent years this phenomenon has gradually decreased. With the improvement of people's civilization quality, the attitude towards compliance with traffic rules has changed dramatically. In addition, pedestrians are now also punished if they violate the rules, and it is believed that the behavior of "Chinese-style road crossing" has become a thing of the past.
Comity is not the essence of the problem: it is the restriction of pedestrians that is the key.
With the above two points of support, there seems to be a strong case for the abolition of the "parking courtesy" rule. However, the writer believes that "comity" is not the root of solving the problem of traffic accidents. On the contrary, too much emphasis on comity may lead some people to think that "the road is mine, you should let us", which can only exacerbate road disputes. Therefore, the fundamental solution to the problem lies in the imposition of restraint on pedestrians, and only by truly going their own way and fully obeying traffic lights can the debate over comity or not become irrelevant.
Epilogue. There is a lot of controversy over whether or not the parking courtesy rule has been lifted. The change in traffic norms behind urbanization, the sweeping shift in management, and the increase in civility all provide support for cancellation. However, we cannot ignore the fact that comity is not the solution to the problem at all. Only by restraining pedestrians can true order and safety be achieved on the road. In the future of traffic management, we need to comprehensively consider all factors to find an ideal model that can not only reflect the quality of civilization, but also ensure traffic safety.
Commentary: Deep thinking about the nature of traffic courtesy.
After reading the article above about the parking courtesy controversy, I have a deeper reflection on this topic. Factors such as the background of urbanization, management changes, and increased civility mentioned in the article do provide some reasonable support for the abolition of parking courtesy regulations. However, in commenting on this issue, we may wish to consider several aspects.
First of all, the paper emphasizes the management crisis caused by the uneven level of civilization in the context of urbanization. The acceleration of urbanization has led to a sharp increase in the number of private cars on the road, and the management system has been more motorized for a while. This has led to some uncivilized traffic phenomena, such as "Chinese-style crossing the road", becoming a common behavior. In this context, the implementation of parking courtesy regulations for private cars can be seen as a stopgap measure to maintain traffic order and reduce potential accidents. However, the article also points out that due to changes in management, it is no longer only about motor vehicles, but also on electric vehicles, pedestrians, etc., which provides a reasonable basis for the abolition of parking courtesy regulations.
Secondly, the improvement of the level of civilization mentioned in the article provides some support for the abolition of parking comity regulations. Civilization is not born and needs to be cultivated through education and propaganda. In this regard, some progress has indeed been made in society, and there has been a noticeable change in attitudes towards compliance with traffic rules. The bad Xi of the past are gradually decreasing, and the observance of traffic rules is increasing. This supports the idea of abolishing the parking comity rule. However, we should also note that the improvement of the level of civilization is not achieved overnight, and it still needs to be consolidated and improved through continuous education.
However, on this issue, I am more inclined to emphasize the importance of comity. At the end of the article, it is mentioned that "courtesy" is not the root of the traffic problem, but the implementation of pedestrian restraint is the key. I couldn't agree more. Comity is a manifestation of social civilization and a concrete embodiment of morality and quality. In road traffic, mutual respect and courtesy can enhance the cohesion of the whole society. While comity is not a substitute for restraint on violations, comity and restraint are not contradictory. In my opinion, it is necessary to cultivate people's civilized quality of transportation by strengthening the education of comity, rather than simply abolishing the rule of comity.
To sum up, the controversy over parking courtesy regulations is how to better maintain traffic order and safety. In the context of urbanization, we need to manage traffic more holistically, including the regulation of motor vehicles, electric vehicles, and pedestrians. While improving the level of civilization, we should pay more attention to the education of courtesy, and cultivate the good quality of traffic civilization in which people take the initiative to abide by the rules and respect each other. In this way, we can find a more reasonable and effective balance in traffic management.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!