On July 27, 1953, the War to Resist US Aggression and Aid Korea ended, but how to settle the 1.3 million soldiers became a problem. **Why did the leadership decide to let them stay in North Korea?Admiral Yang Yong's proposal became the solution.
The considerations behind staying behind.
After the signing of the armistice agreement, the volunteers were supposed to welcome the cheers and applause of the country, but the return of 1.3 million soldiers will be a big burden. Admiral Yang Yong's suggestion became a good policy.
A dual mission: to defend the country and rebuild Korea.
The soldiers who remained in Korea took on two heavy responsibilities. First of all, South Korea did not sign the armistice agreement, and the war was not over for them. Second, the United States and South Korea signed an agreement to station troops in South Korea, posing a threat to North Korea. Remaining in Korea became an effective means for China to prevent another war.
The great contribution of the Volunteer Army.
During their stay, the volunteers not only held the border with South Korea, but also actively participated in the reconstruction of North Korea. The construction of railway bridges, houses, and reservoirs laid the foundation for the Korean people. During the famine in 1954, the volunteers even saved money to tide over the difficulties with the Koreans.
Kim Il Sung proposed to withdraw his troops, ** and Kim Il Sung reached a consensus.
At the end of 1957, the volunteers began to withdraw to the country in batches. However, North Korean leader Kim Il Sung proposed to withdraw his troops, agreeing with ***. Through external ** pressure, they forced the United States to withdraw its troops.
Yang Yong proposed a plan for the withdrawal of troops.
The number of volunteers remaining in Korea is huge, and it is difficult to withdraw to the country in a rapid and orderly manner. On January 13, 1958, the First Military Commission of the Communist Party of China held a meeting, and General Yang Yong proposed a retreat plan. Retreat in three batches, first observe the movement of the "United **" to ensure the safety of the retreat.
The withdrawal process and Yang Yong's testimonials.
During the withdrawal process, the secrecy plan was strictly implemented for a time. The evacuation of the last group was scheduled for October 25, 1958, when the volunteer train departed. Yang Yong delivered an impassioned speech at the farewell banquet, wishing a bright future for the friendship between China and the DPRK.
Hope and gratitude after evacuation.
With the withdrawal of the last group of volunteers, the friendship between China and North Korea has deepened. The end of these heroic years is not the end, but the beginning of friendly cooperation in a new era. Thanks to the support of the Korean people, the hard work of the volunteers to defend the country and rebuild the DPRK has been fully rewarded.
Conclusion: Heroes are gone, but friendship lives on.
The glorious deeds of the volunteers are remembered by people. Their struggle in the DPRK not only defended the country, but also laid a solid foundation for the friendship between the two countries. Heroes are gone, friendship lives forever, and what is left to the world is a moving history, which is always worthy of our admiration.
This article vividly describes how the 1.3 million volunteers faced domestic problems after the end of the War to Resist US Aggression and Aid Korea in 1953 and their great contributions to staying in Korea. The article presents a heroic picture through the suggestions of General Yang Yong, the decision-making of the first and the construction work of the Volunteer Army in North Korea.
First, the article highlights the difficult decision to stay in North Korea. ** When faced with the problem of returning 1.3 million soldiers, the leader decided to stay in Korea for five years through the suggestion of General Yang Yong. Such a decision not only reduces the economic burden on the country, but also serves to counter the threat that South Korea may provoke another war. This decision reflects the foresight of the leadership and has played a positive role in the security of both countries and regions.
Secondly, the article vividly depicts the great contribution of the Volunteer Army in Korea. After the end of the war, these soldiers did not wait to return to China to be popular, but chose to stay behind and silently contribute to the construction of Korea. The construction of railway bridges and private houses, the construction of reservoirs, and the overcoming of difficulties together during the famine of 1954 all demonstrated the deep affection and responsibility of the volunteers to the Korean people. It's a friendship that transcends borders and makes people feel touched by this group of heroes.
The article also describes in detail the considerations and implementation of the withdrawal process. The withdrawal plan proposed by Admiral Yang Yong demonstrated an efficient and prudent military plan, ensuring the safety of the evacuation by observing the actions of the "joint **". In the end, China and the DPRK jointly decided to withdraw from the DPRK through consultations, laying a solid foundation for the friendly relations between the two countries.
At the end of the article, the outlook and gratitude after the withdrawal are described. With the departure of the last group of volunteers, the friendly relations between China and the DPRK have become even deeper. The efforts of the volunteers for the country and the Korean people have been duly rewarded, which has also laid the foundation for the two countries to continue their friendly cooperation in the new era.
Overall, the article showcased the great deeds of the volunteers in Korea through detailed descriptions and vivid narratives, highlighting the wise decisions of the country's leadership. This history fully expresses the respect and gratitude for these heroes, leaving readers with a deep impression of this history.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!