I don't own a dog and am not considered a dog lover. But I think that dogs are different from pigs, cows and sheep, and they have a special connection with humans in human history, so under certain conditions, I am willing to treat dogs and people equally.
Legal status of dogs: the same crime as a person.
Since dogs are treated the same as people, dogs should be punished in the same way as people if they break the law. It's like "a prince is guilty of the same crime as the common people." In turn, we should also pay attention to the rights of dogs while protecting human rights, and as a member of a civilized society, we have such a responsibility.
The problem of dog catching: there must be a law to follow.
As for the question of whether to support the capture of all dogs without a leash, we think it is first necessary to find out whether there is a law that clearly stipulates that dogs must be leashed when they go out. If there is no such law, or if there are some exceptions or ambiguities, then a "catch it all" approach cannot be adopted.
It's like if the law doesn't clearly stipulate that you must wear clothes when you go out, otherwise it's illegal. So if someone goes out naked for some reason, they shouldn't be taken away, let alone killed on the spot.
It's not just about humanity, it's about dogs!
The problem of categorizing dogs: there must be a master and a non-master.
Secondly, we also need to distinguish between two situations for dogs that can move freely outside without leashes. One has a master, but forgot to tie the leash;The other is ownerless, which is also known as a wild dog. Therefore, when we see a dog without a leash, we should first judge whether it has an owner or an owner.
It's like if a person is arrested because of **, if the crime is not serious, he pays a fine, and he receives an education, he should be taken away by his family or unit, and he can't be handled at will, let alone leave by himself, and he can't be shot directly.
So we think that since the ** person has such a right, then the owner dog who is not on a leash should also have the same right. This is the protection of both human rights and dog rights, which is the most basic in a civilized society. Unless we admit that our society is not civilized enough.
Dealing with dogs: there must be a degree and a law.
In addition, if there is a law that clearly stipulates that all wild dogs should be caught, then dogs with owners who are not on leashes can also be treated as wild dogs if they do not wear the owner's information and ***. If there is no such law, then the wild dogs should be handed over to the professional dog catching team, and the dogs that have owners and are not leashed should be handed over to the owners to deal with, and those who should be punished, caught, and killed.
As the saying goes, to Caesar is to Caesar, and to Rome what is to Rome.
The Question of Dog Rights: A Sign of a Civilized Society.
To sum up, we can't easily say that all dogs that are not on a leash are captured and disposed of. This is not what a society under the rule of law should have, nor is it the basic principle and strategy of a civilized society for dogs.
Of course, some people will say that dogs are not human beings and that dogs should not have the same rights as people. But remember: if a society can do whatever it takes to dogs, then people will suffer similarly.
In short, just as not all clothed people are good people, dogs that are not on a leash have a variety of reasons and should not be caught invariably, let alone beaten to death with a stick.