In the ocean of the Internet, every text and article is like a small boat, carrying the author's thoughts and emotions, sailing in the torrent of information. Recently, I received a "reminder letter" issued by the *** platform in a variety of ways, reminding me of the illegal content of a series of articles. This reminder is not only a warning to me, but also a wake-up call to all our network participants.
First, we need to understand what constitutes abusive content. In the "Reminder Letter", several articles were judged to be violations, including "[In-depth Analysis] The Ministry of State Security Issued a Document: Be Vigilant against Singing and Weakening China's Economic People (1) Qianshun Wanshun", "In-depth Analysis] The Financial Regulatory Bureau: Repeat the Same Mistake within Five Years and Propose Heavy Punishment (1) Qianshun Wanshun" and so on. These articles may touch on sensitive political and economic topics, or use inappropriate language and expressions, thereby violating the platform's rules.
However, we can't simply classify these articles as "violations" and dismiss them. Instead, we should dig deeper into the content and presentation of these articles and think about why they are judged to be violations. First of all, these articles may involve certain sensitive political and economic topics, which often involve the interests of the country and the stability of society, so they need to be handled with caution. Second, these articles may use overly drastic and extreme language and expressions, which may cause controversy and adverse reactions.
So, how should we, as authors, respond to this reminder?
First, we should be grateful for the friendly reminder. Whether it is an on-site prompt or an email reminder, it is a responsible attitude of the platform towards the author. This type of reminder gives the author a chance to explain and correct it, rather than directly banning it. This friendly approach is more conducive to promoting communication and understanding between authors and the platform, and helps to maintain a good online ecosystem. We also need to recognize that the maintenance of the network ecosystem requires the joint efforts of each and every one of us. As network participants, we have the responsibility to maintain a healthy and harmonious network environment. We should respect the views and feelings of others and refrain from using offensive and discriminatory words and methods. At the same time, we also need to actively spread positive energy and valuable information, and contribute to the improvement of the network ecology.
Second, we need to take this reminder seriously and recognize possible violations in our articles. We need to analyze our articles in depth, find out possible problems and shortcomings, and improve them. At the same time, we also need to understand the rules and standards of the platform to ensure that our articles meet the requirements of the platform.
Third, it is very important to allow explanations and complaints. Authors have the right to know the reasons for the offending content and have the opportunity to explain and appeal their own articles. This helps to ensure that the platform's judgment is more fair and accurate, and also helps to protect the rights and interests of authors.
Fourth, it is also very important to improve the platform procedures. If there are imperfections in the system procedures, resulting in misjudgment or omission of illegal content, then the platform should actively improve and improve. This can not only improve the operational efficiency of the platform, but also reduce the occurrence of similar disputes and better maintain the harmony and stability of the network ecosystem.
Finally, I would like to emphasize that the Internet is an open platform and we should respect diverse voices and perspectives. However, that doesn't mean we can post anything at will. When publishing content, we need to think carefully and choose carefully to ensure that our content meets the requirements of social ethics and laws and regulations. Only in this way can we truly play the role of the network and contribute to the development and progress of society.
In short, the "Reminder Letter" is a wake-up call and education for us. We should take this reminder seriously, analyze our articles and expressions in depth, and ensure that our content meets the requirements of the platform and the requirements of social ethics, laws and regulations. At the same time, we also need to realize that the maintenance of the network ecology requires the joint efforts and dedication of each and every one of us. Only in this way can we work together to create a healthy, harmonious and vibrant online environment.
[Appendix 1] The author suggests
Respecting the author, understanding the author, continuing to provide products and services that exceed the author's expectations, and guiding a positive, healthy and modern lifestyle are the concepts that the author believes the platform should adhere to and advocate.
In the author's eyes, every employee of the platform (including robots) represents the platform. Platform 001% mistakes, for the author, are 100% losses.
The most important measure of a platform's success is how well it satisfies its authors. Grow with the author and make the platform perfect in complementarity.
The author is not a god or a slave, but an "eternal partner" of the platform.
P.SII].Reminder Letter
Dear *** Author:
The platform detects that your *** has frequently published illegal content, and hereby reminds you that if you continue to publish illegal content in the future, the content published by the account may not be recommended by the platform, and the account subject will be banned and punished.
The following articles of yours have been judged by the platform to be in violation, please check the detailed reasons on the work management page:
The good ecology of the platform depends on the maintenance and support of the authors, please refer to the "*Platform Works Publishing Specifications" for more standards
[Attachment 3] Appeal results
Stressing politics, proving morality, and stressing righteousness is the author's premise for writing. The author works hard to do this, and strives to be full of positive energy. The outcome of the appeal was satisfactory.