On 27 June 1986, the International Court of Justice ruled that the United States had interfered with Nicaragua's sovereignty. Nicaraguan Governor Descoto made a strong statement calling on the United States to respect international commitments. However, the United States arrogantly chose to ignore the ruling, underscoring its disregard for international law. The scene is reminiscent of the 2014 South China Sea arbitration case in the Philippines, revealing the double standards of major powers in international affairs.
The International Court of Justice in The Hague has nothing to do with the Nicaragua arbitration, and the withdrawal of the case by the United States demonstrates its arrogance in the rule of law. The South China Sea dispute also has implications for international law**, however, China's refusal to arbitrate is legitimate, in contrast to the U.S. attitude toward Nicaragua.
Judging from the pre-colonial history of Nicaragua, Spain's brutal plunder brought it a bumper harvest. However, the British invasion, piracy, and the independence of the Central American Commonwealth all took a toll on the land.
After Nicaragua's free independence, Britain and the United States vied for its strategic position. After a long military occupation, Nicaragua finally drove out the American team in 1933, but the influence of the United States did not really withdraw.
At the end of the 20th century, the United States intervened in Nicaraguan affairs in the name of "protecting interests". Nicaragua resisted, but the United States forcibly intervened through low-intensity wars, military provocations, and economic blockades.
The United States even planted mines in Nicaragua through the CIA, but shifted the blame to the Nicaraguan armed forces. This behaviour has attracted international attention, and the ports of Nicaragua have been plagued by mines and the economy has been directly affected.
In the international arena, Nicaragua is once again confronting the United States for its illegal acts. This time, the world will see the determination of a small country to stand up to a large country and stand up for its dignity.
Nicaragua, a country that stands for its independence and dignity under the nose of the United States, resists the oppression of history and fights for true freedom.
Nicaragua, no longer silent, shows the world its brave back.
The above details the historical and international law confrontations between Nicaragua and the United States, showing the resilience of a small country in the shadow of a great power. This has led to deep reflection on international relations, the arrogance of great powers, and the autonomy of small states.
First of all, the article highlights the ruling of the International Court of Justice against the United States and Nicaragua**'s resolute attitude towards it. This shows the asymmetry between large and small countries in the international system, with large countries often ignoring international law on some issues, while small countries need to defend their rights and interests through legal means. This reflects the imperfection of the international rule of law and the need for more justice and equality.
Second, the article mentions the South China Sea arbitration case, emphasizing the double standards of the great powers by comparing Nicaragua with the United States. The United States has been lawless and arrogant on the Nicaragua issue, while it has criticized China on the grounds of upholding international law in the South China Sea. Such behavior raises questions about the role of major powers in international relations, and that they should participate in international affairs in a more responsible manner, rather than acting arbitrarily by virtue of their strength.
The article also depicts Nicaragua's tortuous journey to independence through a historical review. From Spanish colonization, Anglo-American rivalry, to military occupation in the 20th century, Nicaragua has always fought in the whirlpool of history. This demonstrates the persistence of a small country in maintaining its independence and dignity, and inspires more countries to remain independent and self-reliant under the pressure of major powers.
The article concludes with a discussion of Nicaragua's resolute resistance to U.S. intervention at the end of the 20th century, as well as to the issue of mines. This spirit of resistance is manifested not only at the military level, but also in international tribunals. This has led to an increase in international attention to Nicaragua, and small countries have made their voices heard in the international arena. This sets an example for other small countries to prove that there are opportunities to defend their rights and interests, even in the face of great power.
Overall, this article brings to life the historical contradictions and struggles of Nicaragua and the United States through an in-depth historical review and the rulings of international tribunals. It stimulates readers' concerns about international relations, the international rule of law, and the autonomy of small countries, and leads people to reflect on the responsibilities and responsibilities of major countries in international affairs.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!