Title: Revealing the Secret of the Philippines ** Infighting!Marcos vs Duterte, the story behind the fierce wrestling!
In this high-profile Philippine political "palace fight" scenario, the game between Marcos and Deputy Duterte has attracted international attention. The focus of this political tussle revolves around how to deal with the issue of local armed forces in the Philippines.
The political drama of the struggle for military power.
It all started with Marcos's ambitions after he came to power. He tried to achieve nominal unity through dialogue with local armed groups, by ceding part of his interests. This move has been successful to a certain extent, as evidenced by the intention to cooperate with civil society organizations and the upcoming peace talks.
However, Deputy Sarah Duterte's hardline attitude has caused divisions within the country. She was adamantly opposed to peace talks with local armed forces such as the New People's Army, seeing them as a bargain with the devil. This hard-line stance is in stark contrast to **, and also reflects the differences between the two men in dealing with internal issues.
The Marcos and Duterte family factor.
This disagreement is not just a difference in political positions, the deeper reason can be traced back to the political influence of the two leaders' families. Marcos's father was a ** and was a moderate. This prefers Marcos Jr. to resolve issues through dialogue and negotiation, even if it is necessary to concede some national interests.
On the contrary, Duterte's father was a political strongman who fought against corruption and drugs across the Philippines. This influence has made Sarah Duterte more inclined to use hard-handed means to solve the local armed problem once and for all. Their family backgrounds, like their political bloodline, determine their different positions on this issue.
The rationality and hidden dangers of policy choices.
Marcos's idea of resolving the issue of local armed forces through dialogue and consultation may seem simple, but it faces huge hidden dangers. If the Philippines fails to address local armed forces, the country's internal situation will be detrimental to future development. However, who can guarantee that local armed groups will always honor their agreements?Such a policy is tantamount to raising tigers.
Duterte's hardline approach advocates the use of force to resolve the issue. In this way, the authority of ** can be enhanced, and the problem can be solved once and for all. However, the Philippine military's executive capacity makes it difficult to solve the problem of local armed forces in the short term. There are also divisions within the military, with the Chief of the General Staff supporting **Marcos, but different ideas within the army remain.
The political consequences of infighting.
This military power infighting will have a profound impact on ** and deputy **. If Marcos wins, he will be completely free from the influence of the Duterte family. However, failure will result in him being left with nothing. This kind of political wrestling is also reminiscent of the coups that have occurred in the history of the Philippines.
The complexities of Philippine politics are reflected in everything from internal military divisions to local issues, all of which affect the country's development. The existence of internal divisions makes it difficult to compromise, and the use of strong force may lead to the continued expansion of the armed forces.
Conclusion: The political arena is unpredictable.
Overall, the infighting in the Philippines is like an intricate political drama. The disagreement between Marcos and Duterte is both a rational policy choice and a political risk that it will be difficult to achieve. And this infighting is not only about the political future of the two leaders, but also about the future of the entire Philippines.
In this political arena, the struggle for military power has become a key force in driving the development of the plot. The future development of Philippine politics depends on the outcome of this infighting. And this process will undoubtedly leave a strong mark in the long river of history.