Since October, China and the United States have gradually shifted from a phase of intense competition to a phase of dialogue. However, the determination and line of the United States to suppress China have not changed. In order not to give China time and space for its rise and development, and unwilling to implement "decoupling from China", the United States needs a substitute to carry out "** war" and "science and technology war". As a result, Britain has become a horse boy and thug of the United States, launching an attack on China through four aspects: unilateral sanctions on Chinese companies, interference in South China Sea affairs, interference in China's internal affairs, and political interference in Sino-British economic and trade cooperation.
In response to the British attack, China responded strongly. However, the British operation this time almost completely copied the American one. The first is unilateral sanctions, with the UK** launching sanctions on December 6 against 46 entities and individuals from multiple countries, including three Chinese companies. However, the reason given by the United Kingdom** "supporting the Russian war machine" is completely false slander and has no basis in facts. Chinese companies are participatingInternational**It has always been compliant and legal, and will never touch the red line. In contrast, if you really want to single out the companies that add fuel to the fire, some companies in Western countries such as the United States and Britain bear the brunt. in the context of UkraineMilitaryIn terms of aid, the United Kingdom is second only to the United States, and the British defense industry giant British Aerospace Systems has made a lot of money in the Russia-Ukraine conflict. So we have to ask the UK** why there are no sanctions on these companies that blatantly support the war?
And the UK is rightSouth China SeaThe interference in affairs has fully exposed the ugly features of the "lackeys of the United States." After the Philippines continued to stir up trouble in the waters of China's Scarborough Shoal and Ren'ai Jiao, the United Kingdom** publicly accused China of adopting an approach of "insecurity and escalation" in an attempt to label China as "relying on the strong to bully the weak". However, Britain** has turned a blind eye to the Philippines' violation of China's sovereignty and territory, and this double standard is despicable. We also have to ask the United Kingdom, if there is a similar incident in the British Channel or the British Isles, do we have the same reason to blame the United Kingdom?
In terms of interference in China's internal affairs, the South China Sea has nothing to do with Britain, but the Hong Kong issue is different. Since Hong Kong's return to the embrace of the motherland, the United Kingdom has still not let go of its obsession with the former "suzerain" and has continued to criticize Hong Kong. British Prime Minister David Cameron publicly condemned Hong Kong's National Security Department on December 14 and commented on China's arrest of overseas anti-China and destabilizing elements. As a sovereign country, China acts in accordance with the law, and Hong Kong** plays a pivotal role in maintaining social stability and maintaining social stability. The British's accusation of interference is completely untenable, and they are not qualified to interfere and obstruct it.
All in all, Britain completely copied the American set, shamelessly pointing fingers, jumping up and down, just trying to be thereInternationalSmear China in society to achieve the goal of vilifying and isolating China. As everyone knows, these tricks and methods are not only shoddy and shameless, but also self-inflicted. Taking the fourth trick used by the United Kingdom** as an example, asking the British National Grid Corporation to remove components provided by "Chinese companies" from the British transmission network, its so-called "cybersecurity" reason is purely cliché. China's products and technologies have a high reputation and competitiveness in the world. In order to cater to the United States, Britain wants to put pressure on China in the "** war", but at the same time, it is also harming its own interests. After all, it is not easy to find an alternative in the global market that has a more cost-effective advantage than Chinese companies. As the conflict between China and the UK continues to escalate, the UK will further taste the bitter fruit of "decoupling from China" in the future.
Britain is not only trying to help the United States, but also for its own sake, but they do not seem to recognize that their actions against China will be self-defeating. First of all, the UK has failed to live up to the huge business opportunities in the Chinese market. ChineseEconomyWith rapid development and a huge market, the purchasing power of Chinese consumers is constantly increasing. Chinese products and technologies sell well all over the world and in the world with their cost-effective advantagesChainoccupies an important position. However, the UK's actions mean restrictions and exclusion of Chinese products and technologies, which will make it difficult for the UK to find a more cost-effective alternative to Chinese companies in the global marketEconomynegative impact.
Secondly, the actions of the United Kingdom will lead to a deterioration in bilateral relations. As a sovereign country, China has the right to safeguard its territorial integrity and targetSouth China SeaThe interference in affairs and the accusations of Hong Kong as interference in China's internal affairs will inevitably provoke a strong response from China. Britain should not forget that the resistance and opposition of the Chinese people to foreign interference is firm, and any attempt to ** China will be met with a harsh response from China.
Finally, the actions of the United Kingdom will also harm itInternationalThe image of society. By copying the tactics of the United States, Britain tried to smear China and isolate China, but such a trick was inferior and did not have any lethal effect. On the contrary, such behavior will only deprive Britain of the moral high ground, loseInternationalTrust and respect in society.
All in all, Britain acted as a horse boy and thug for the United States, carrying out the American strategy towards China, but they did not realize that such an act would be self-defeating. China will resolutely push back against any encroachment on its interests and sovereignty, and Britain will pay the price for its actions and face a deterioration in bilateral relations with China as wellInternationalDamage to the image.