Recently, the United States announced the formation of a "convoy alliance" to respond to Yemen's Houthi attacks on merchant ships in the Red Sea waters, a move that has attracted widespread attention from the international community. This game, nicknamed the "ship raid war," involves issues such as the comparison of military spending and missile consumption, and even more complex political calculations are hidden behind it. The U.S. military claimed to have successfully shot down 38 Houthi drones in the Red Sea. Each SM-2 "Standard" anti-aircraft missile used for interception costs $2.1 million, which begs the question, is this war really worth such a sky-high price?Behind the glitter of missiles is the huge cost of military spending. The Houthis are not unreasonable fighting machines, and they have made clear political demands.
They demanded that Israel cease fire and allow humanitarian supplies to enter Gaza through the Egyptian Rafah crossing. This request may seem ordinary, but it carries the expectations of countless people on the battlefield of the Middle East. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has become a scar in the Middle East, and the Houthi voice is an echo of this contradiction and hatred. On the big stage of world politics, each character has their own bargaining chips, and the Houthis skillfully used their political chips in this "ship raid war". In this complex Middle East game, the dilemma of US policy is becoming apparent. The high military spending and the complex interweaving of political interests have made it difficult for the United States to extricate itself. How to improve humanitarian assistance and promote a Palestinian-Israeli ceasefire has become the way to solve the dilemma.
Behind these political and military considerations, the fate of millions of civilians is at stake, and the war and strife in the Middle East are still ongoing, requiring more wisdom and courage to find a peaceful solution. At this juncture, the United States needs to examine whether its policy in the Middle East should break with its traditional bias toward Israel in order to find a new way out of the chaos. In the face of the "ship raid war", people began to think about the question: missiles are not the only bargaining chip, and the real winner may be the country that can find a lasting peace. Whether the victory of the Houthis represents a new equilibrium in the Middle East has become the focus of attention.
In this intricate game in the Middle East, the war situation is complicated, and the games of all parties are intricate, and the future of the Middle East seems to contain the dawn of change in this "ship raid war". The trap of missile strategy. Although the missile strategy has achieved a temporary victory in the short term, it has also trapped the United States in a long-term political and military imbalance. The high military spending and the frequent use of missiles have not only overwhelmed the US military spending, but also weakened its political influence in the Middle East. The trap of the missile strategy has put the United States in a dilemma in the Middle East, and it has become imperative to reflect on its Middle East policy. The Red Sea has become a meeting point of war and peace, and this meeting point is both a crisis and an opportunity. The frequency of wars in these waters has led to a question about whether peace is what the Middle East desires most.
The Houthis demonstrated their political aspirations through the "ship raids", perhaps as an expression of their yearning for peace through war. In this complex region, the paradox of the Red Sea may lead to a deeper reflection on the common interests of all parties in this conflicting waters. The only option for peace. In this chaotic situation in the Middle East, the Palestinian-Israeli conflict has always been a node of contradictions that is difficult to resolve. The political demands of the Houthis, as well as China's COSCO independence campaign, suggest that peace may be the most pressing need in the Middle East. Pushing for an end to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and improving humanitarian assistance are seen as the only way to resolve the Middle East problem. Only when peace moves towards peace in the Middle East can the "ship raid war" on the Red Sea hopefully end, thus bringing new stability to the Middle East.
The surge in military spending and political calculations have accompanied the roar of missiles, but missiles are not the only bargaining chips in this complex Middle East game. The real victor may be the one who can find a lasting peace. Perhaps in the rough waters of the Red Sea, a real change is brewing in the Middle East. In general, in the midst of the chaotic situation in the Middle East, the Red Sea has become a bewildering mystery, and the "ship raid" is only one node in this mystery. Through an in-depth analysis of this incident, we can see the contest between missiles and peace, the battle of wisdom between the Houthis and COSCO, and the unpredictable future pattern of the Middle East. The roar of missiles seems to give the Houthis a momentary advantage, but it also puts the United States in a political and military imbalance.
The high military consumption and the traps of the missile strategy have forced the United States to rethink its policy orientation in the Middle East. The political demands expressed by the Houthis through the "ship raids" reveal the desire for peace in the Middle East. This makes the Red Sea a meeting point of war and peace, full of dangers and opportunities for development.