Traffic accidents are not uncommon, but when associated with a popular car, it can easily lead to some controversy. Not long ago in Qingyuan, Guangdong, a very tragic major traffic accident occurred in the ideal L7. According to the **and** on the Internet, it can be learned that this ideal L7 rear-ended a large truck at a fast speed, the roof of the car was almost lifted, the AB pillar was suspected to have been broken, the driver was suspected to have died, and the whole accident scene was very tragic.
After the accident, although Li Auto immediately made a relevant response, "the vehicle did not turn on the assisted driving function during driving, 3 seconds before the collision, the speed reached 178km h, the driver took braking measures, and finally rear-ended the truck in front at a speed of 96km h, got under the truck and rushed out of the road." However, there are still many netizens who began to question the safety of the ideal car, believing that the strength of the A and B pillars of the ideal L7 was insufficient, which led to the tragedy.
may be that seeing that it can't calm the doubts of netizens, the ideal is to simply announce the accident-related ** directly. According to the vehicle's ** display, the vehicle drove at high speed all the way, and the maximum speed even reached 186km h, and 3 seconds before the collision, the driver took braking measures at a speed of 178km h, and the speed greatly exceeded the AEB working range.
Then, in third-party surveillance**, the vehicle rear-ended a large truck that was squirming across the two-lane diagonal lane in front of it at a speed of 96 km h, burrowed under the truck and ran off the road.
Originally, I understood the ideal very well, but after the release of this **, I had a few questions I wanted to ask the ideal, first of all, what is the significance of announcing this **?Is it to prove that the owner of the car is speeding, so AEB does not work, and he is not responsible?Or is it to deliberately return to the question of the A and B pillars, and emphasize the speed of the car?
Secondly, let's just say that this violent collision caused serious damage to the vehicle, resulting in the interruption of the subsequent driving record, but the timing of this interruption is really good, which proves that the speed of the vehicle was as high as 178km h, and it proves that the driver stepped on the brakes. That's okay, there doesn't seem to be anything ideal in this, so what do you want to express when you release a third-party perspective to monitor**?The vehicle drove by quickly and collidedThis is not an answer to the question that explains the strength of the AEB and AB pillar of the vehicleWhy is this paragraph being published?
Moreover, the ideal announcement of these ** has been authorized by whom, is it the owner's family or the traffic police, before the Formula Leopard announced or with the ** downward adjustment of the vehicle operation data, this is good, dash cam information and parking lot monitoring** have been sent. This information is ideal, as a car company, can it be retrieved and published at will?
At the same time, Li Auto also said that the final facts and responsibilities of the traffic accident are subject to the determination of the traffic police department. The traffic police department has not yet released the results, is it reasonable for Li Auto to release this information and **?
Does the driving record information belong to the privacy of the car owner, and is it illegal for the car company to publish it on its own?Does the car company have the right to store and analyze the daily car usage data of car owners?After consumers buy an ideal car, can their every move be monitored by the ideal car, and all the ** and data information can be retrieved if the ideal wants to?Who can retrieve the ideal?
Li Auto was besieged by netizens and wanted to prove its innocence, originally everyone understood this, but now when they are concerned about personal privacy, such a fair release of information will indeed make people uneasy, although personal privacy is difficult to say in today's society, but no one wants to be monitored like this.
Back to the beginning, because of this major accident, the A and B pillars of the L7 were broken, which led to the safety of Li Auto being questioned. Whether it is the 178km h of the vehicle seriously speeding or the 96km h at the time of the collision, it is indeed much faster than the crash test, and the rear-end collision of a large truck may indeed cause very serious consequences.
But the reason why netizens are reluctant is not only because there are other cases that prove that similar collisions may not necessarily cause serious consequences of the death of **, but also that it is not the first time that Ideal has encountered an accident with a and B pillar breakage.
You must know that safety has been an important propaganda point of the ideal car, taking the ideal L7 as an example, the official website introduction says that "the high-strength steel of the body-in-white accounts for more than 75%, of which the hot stamping steel accounts for more than 29%;It has a high top bearing capacity and can withstand a load of 12 tons. "Obtained the 25% offset collision of the main driver and co-driver of the China Insurance Research Institute, and the double defect double excellent G rating. The flagship-level body safety structure can effectively withstand the impact of collisions. ”
And before the ideal MEGA white body of the bolt was picked up by netizens, who let the bolt be in the position of the junction of the A and B pillars, even if the use of high-strength bolt + resistance welding process is an optimal process solution, but Kou Dongpeng, the person in charge of MEGA body safety, mentioned when introducing the side body structure of MEGA: "These two pieces are added together, a piece of 1500 megapascals, and a piece of 3000 megapascals of strength." "It's hard not to wonder if the safety standards of the cars they make are really sufficient.
Safety is no trivial matter, this Qingyuan accident may really not be directly related to the safety of Li Auto, he is an accident caused by speeding. We should look at this incident with an objective and rational attitude, and call on all motorists to obey the traffic rules to ensure the safety of themselves and others. At the same time, car companies should also strengthen the research and development and testing of safety performance to provide consumers with safer and more reliable automotive products.