In the collation of Professor Libo's speeches, the issue of major European countries breaking away from NATO and forming European armies was involved. The fourth question reveals the reasons behind Germany's and France's desire for independent development, and why Britain is firmly opposed to it.
Behind the European divide.
The original text states that Germany and France are real countries in Europe, while Britain is an island nation separated from the European continent. This geographical separation has led to Britain's unique relationship with continental Europe.
The involvement of blood and alliances.
The article goes on to elaborate on the blood ties between Britain and the United States, and regards Britain and the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and other countries as brothers and sisters, forming a close system. Britain's accession to the European Union was blocked by the United States and eventually left the European Union, which has been interpreted as a misalignment of interests between the two.
The strategic layout of the United States.
Professor Libo believes that the United States pursues globalization and uses the Five Eyes alliance as the top of the pyramid, and its member countries are true brothers. The United States maintains its global hegemony by preventing the unification of Europe, especially the formation of European armies.
The selfishness of the United States.
The article points out that the United States has taken advantage of Europe's internal contradictions to disintegrate the European Union, and has hit the euro through events such as the Greek debt crisis and the Russia-Ukraine conflict, revealing the selfish behavior of the United States. Professor Libo believes that the United States will never allow any country to sit on an equal footing with it and share the wealth of the world.
The UK's concerns and position.
Professor Libo explained why Britain did not support the formation of European armies by Germany and France. He believes that once a unified power is formed in Europe, especially the creation of a European army, it will threaten the global hegemony of the United States. Therefore, Britain will not support Germany and France, because this will mean European independence, and the United States will be marginalized.
Uncover the true face of America.
The article calls on readers to think deeply, pointing out that the United States is an extremely selfish country that pursues the maximization of its own interests. By intervening in Europe, the United States is trying to maintain its global dominance.
Epilogue. Professor Libo's views reveal the complex relationship of interests in international politics. By analyzing geopolitics, kinship, and global strategy, the article reveals the differences between European countries and the manipulation of the United States behind them. Perhaps, we need to re-examine the United States as a country and ** to get a clearer picture of its true face.
Professor Libo's views are vividly and in detail presented in the above article, which has triggered my deep thinking on international politics and international relations. This essay profoundly sheds light on the complex relationship between major European countries and the role of the United States in global affairs, thus raising a series of questions about the international political landscape.
First of all, the article mentions the issue of the desire of Germany and France to break away from NATO and form a European army. Professor Libo believes that the UK's opposition to this move is mainly due to the unique geographical location and kinship with the United States. This thought-provoking perspective on international affairs led me to reflect on how geography, history, and culture influence political decision-making between countries.
Second, the article involves the global strategic layout of the United States, and regards the Five Eyes alliance as the top of the pyramid. This global alliance, based on kinship, made me wonder what it was that made these countries so strongly linked that they formed a stance against European unity. It also made me think about the delicate balance between interests and morality in international relations, and the role that the League of Nations plays in shaping the world pattern.
The article also highlights the selfish behavior of the United States, which has hit the euro by exposing its manipulation of internal European issues, especially through events such as the Russia-Ukraine conflict. This makes me wonder what kind of basis should cooperation between countries be based? Is it based on the common good, or is it out of moral and mutual respect? It has also led to a deeper understanding of justice and injustice in the international system.
Finally, the article calls on readers to re-examine the United States and recognize its selfish behavior. This revelation of the true face of the international powers has provoked me to think about power and morality in international politics. Is the act of power in international politics inevitable, or is it possible to achieve a more just and equitable global order through the joint efforts of the international community?
Overall, this article provides readers with a profound journey of thought through Professor Libo's unique perspective and in-depth analysis. It not only reveals the complex relationship of interests in international politics, but also triggers a series of reflections on international relations, global governance, and the international system. This is further proof that international politics is a complex and challenging field that requires us to keep an open mind and think deeply in order to better understand and respond to changes in global affairs.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!