Title: Wisdom Silence: Deep Meaning at a Soviet Banquet
In the long history of the squadron, the two generals of ** and *** have written a long military chapter together with their different temperaments and role divisions. Although he has a fiery temper, he has won high prestige in the army. In 1950, when the Korean War broke out, ** came into being, serving as the commander-in-chief of the War to Resist US Aggression and Aid Korea.
In the midst of the Soviet banquet, Stalin's sudden question made the atmosphere tense for a while. In an aggressive tone, Stalin asked *** if he had ever killed a prisoner with his own hands. At this moment, all eyes on the scene were focused on ***, as if guessing how he would respond to this thorny question.
Surprisingly, however, ** was not knocked down by this sudden questioning, and he glanced at Stalin calmly, but did not say a word. This silence, while unseemly, has fueled more suspicion. **'s silence is not weakness, but out of thoughtful consideration of the overall situation. At this critical juncture, he saw the responsibility to maintain national unity and wisely chose not to respond to avoid falling into the trap that might have been set.
Stalin did not give up, and continued to ask questions, challenging the understanding of international conventions. He asked: "Don't you know that international conventions prohibit the killing of prisoners?"In the face of such pressure, ** still chose to remain silent, and this deep silence made some of the Soviets present feel dissatisfied and stood up to accuse
During the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression, our country strictly abided by the Geneva Conventions, treated prisoners well, and knew these principles well. However, Stalin's questioning shows a misunderstanding of the squadron, and behind the choice of silence is a deep consideration of the overall situation. If it is too firmly denied, it may trigger an investigation, intensify internal contradictions, and affect the overall unity of the War to Resist US Aggression and Aid Korea. Therefore, his silence is not only a tacit endorsement of international conventions, but also a wise choice to maintain the country's image and unite the overall situation.
This scene at the banquet of the Soviet Union has become a portrayal of the most skillful political wisdom. He is not a restless fire, but a wise thinker. In the ups and downs of his military career, he has deeply moved people with his overall view and thoughtful leadership style. His silence was not only a response to Stalin, but also a reflection of the overall situation.
All in all, the silence of wisdom at the banquet in the USSR was a manifestation of the high wisdom and foresight of a leader. On the stage of history, this calm and wise general, in his unique way, wrote the legend of the rise of the squadron. His silence tells us that in the face of difficulties and pressures, calm, thoughtful, wise and decisive is the true way to lead.