1000 km precision strike, Iran finally opened fire?Thirty six tactics in one move to rescue Gaza

Mondo Culture Updated on 2024-01-19

Iran and China have maintained close interactions, not just for economic gain, but also because both countries are wary of the United States' pursuit of hegemony. Although the United States has been striving for global hegemony, it does not mean that all countries will be afraid of it or obey the United States. In the focus area of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, although the brief ceasefire period brought temporary tranquility, in essence, the conflict is the epitome of American hegemony. However, in the midst of this conflict, Iran has been trying to find a way to free Gaza. By resorting to military means, Iran has demonstrated their determination and courage.

According to comprehensive reports, a day before the ceasefire agreement in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict came into effect, a cargo ship in the Indian Ocean was attacked by drones. Fortunately, the attack only caused the ship **, there was no news of the personnel**. According to the Pentagon's response, the attack was most likely carried out by Iranian drones. According to the staff of the British Maritime Security Company, one of the main reasons why the ship was targeted was because it was owned by an Israeli company. In addition, it is reported that the ship had been turning on the automatic identification and tracking system at that time, so the drone was able to accurately pursue it. It is worth mentioning that Iran's Witness 136 long-range suicide drone hit accurately at a distance of 1,000 kilometers and carried out surprise attacks. This news has caused many analysts to speculate whether Iran is finally about to fire the first shotIran's move is undoubtedly a clever trick to outmaneuver its opponents. As early as the Iran-Iraq war, Iran and Iraq attacked each other's cargo ships. Now, with the development of the Iranian military industry, they have been able to strike Israeli cargo ships at a distance of up to 1000 kilometers with precision. This raises the question of whether Israeli cargo ships will have to make a detour through the Cape of Good Hope in Africa if they cannot continue to use the Arabian Sea, the Red Sea and the Suez Canal, thus increasing costs and distances. In the long run, this will put a lot of pressure on Israeli companies that cannot be ignored. On the other hand, if Israel and the United States use ** to escort cargo ships and rush into the narrow area of the Red Sea, it will be equivalent to sending "human heads" to Iran and Yemeni Houthis. In fact, Yemen's Houthis are not afraid of the US threat. Obviously, Iran's military operation carries a huge risk, on the one hand, to encircle the enemy, and at the same time to distract Western countries. In the past, the United States used indiscriminate bombing to provoke wars and resolve them quickly. And now, Israel is also trying to achieve victory in a short time in this way. In other words, both the United States and Israel are trying to use technological superiority to achieve their hegemony, one wants to be a global hegemon, the other wants to be a small bully in the Middle East. However, a victory on the pitch does not necessarily lead to a final victory. Putting pressure on Israel by other means, such as attacking ships, is a good strategy for Iran.

Iran's successful military approach has brought them new tests and opportunities. By pinpointing targets at a distance of 1000 km, Iran demonstrates to the whole world their strength in the military-technical sphere. However, such actions also come with greater responsibilities and challenges. First of all, Iran needs to maintain the accuracy and reliability of its tactics. While they have achieved this success in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, they will need to ensure that every strike is precise and unmistakable in future military operations. Any mistake could lead to undesirable consequences and even a serious crisis in international relations. Second, Iran needs to deal with domestic and foreign pressures. Iran's military action has attracted widespread attention and controversy, with opinions and voices from different points of view pouring in. Iran must approach these pressures calmly and in a balanced manner so that the situation does not deteriorate further. In addition, Iran is facing sanctions and diplomatic pressure from the international community. Although Iran's actions are in line with their own interests and needs, it is still necessary to carefully manage relations with other countries and avoid serious conflicts with the international community. In addition, Iran needs to continue to invest in R&D and innovation in the field of military technology to enhance its strength and competitiveness. It is only through constant efforts and progress that Iran will be able to maintain its leading position in the military sphere and continue to exert its influence.

There are complex strategic considerations and key factors behind Iran's military action. First, the geopolitical opportunities brought to Iran by the Palestinian-Israeli conflict cannot be ignored. As a key force in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Iran can expand its influence and gain more bargaining chips by engaging in the conflict. By demonstrating its strength and resolve, Iran can have a greater say in regional affairs, while also sending a clear message to other countries that it will not sit idly by, but will take concrete action to defend its interests. Second, Iran's actions also demonstrate their deterrence and counterattack against Israel. As the decisive force in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, Israel has been using its technological and military superiority to suppress and control Palestine. By attacking Israeli cargo ships, Iran has effectively broken this encirclement and exerted more pressure on the Israeli side. With this approach, Iran sends a clear signal to Israel that it has the capability to strike at Israel, while also being prepared to take the necessary actions to support Palestinian resistance.

Finally, Iran's actions also reflect their resistance to and challenge US hegemony. The United States has been trying to pursue global hegemony through military means and is trying to bring the Middle East region into its sphere of influence. Iran, through its own military operations, has challenged the hegemony of the United States and proven itself in the military-technical sphere. Iran's strategic goal is to achieve a balanced Middle East and gain more voice and bargaining chips for itself. They hope that by demonstrating their determination and strength, they will strengthen the trend of multipolarization and multilateralism in the Middle East and weaken the influence of the United States. This strategic intention of Iran has also won the support and recognition of some countries, as they are equally concerned about the pursuit of hegemony by the United States and see the potential and opportunities of Iran as a power power.

In conclusion, the cooperation between Iran and China is not meaningless. Through a series of military operations, Iran has demonstrated their determination and strength and challenged the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and US hegemony. This courageous struggle is not only to defend its own interests and territorial integrity, but also a powerful response to US hegemony in the global order. In the process, Iran's military moves have bought them time and bargaining chips, and at the same time provided impetus for the process of multipolarization and multilateralization in the Middle East. However, Iran's actions also pose new challenges and tests, and they need to maintain the accuracy and reliability of their tactics and properly manage pressures and influences at home and abroad. Only through sustained efforts and progress can Iran safeguard its interests in the Middle East and play a more important role in the international community.

Related Pages