The teacher took pictures of the students' ugly shoes and posted them on the Internet, but they were sprayed by netizens who didn't know the goods, and their psychological quality was doubtful!
A teacher who photographed a student's ugly shoes and posted them on the internet, mocking parents who didn't know what kind of mentality he was, was widely criticized by netizens for not knowing what he was talking about.
One teacher has mentioned in the past that while all students wear school uniforms, it is easy to distinguish between their different family backgrounds. Students from well-to-do families tend to adjust their uniforms to fit better, and they themselves are more sophisticated.
Another way to observe is to look at the student's shoes. The quality of the shoes is a direct reflection of the student's financial situation. Some students who live on financial aid may buy expensive sneakers to satisfy their self-esteem in order to hide their poverty.
However, regardless of the student's attire, the teacher must not make it an object of ridicule. It is the responsibility of teachers to treat all students fairly and equally.
A student's attire at school involves parental, school, and individual decisions. If they are not dressed properly, they will be ridiculed by their classmates. Teachers play a balancing role in this process. When discrimination is detected among students, teachers must stop it and correct misconceptions.
The teacher took a picture of a boy wearing a pair of shiny gold shoes during recess and made the following comment, which was quite an unusual move:
I would love to know what kind of parents would choose such a pair of shoes for their children. What considerations and reasons did they take for such a decision?This remark caused dissatisfaction among parents. Whatever a student wears, it should not be a reason for a teacher to talk about parents. As a teacher, shouldn't you avoid making irresponsible comments about others behind your back, failing to achieve even this most basic quality?
Also, when talking about the parents of your own students, it's not good to wear tinted glasses. This view is too narrow and one-sided. Parents can't be blamed for this.
In fact, the shoes worn by boys are called"Kim Chelsea", is a treasure trove for students, not to mention"Heroes can suffer, but they can't step on my Golden Chelsea"This sentence.
This shoe can be said to be a carrier among students, and although it may seem a little uncomfortable to adults, it is very popular among students. Just like the sparkly princess shoes that some girls love, these shoes are also quite popular with elementary school students.
This is not something that parents buy willingly, but out of respect for the students. They want their children to have no regrets in their childhood. This attitude of parents is commendable and should not be ridiculed by teachers.
Teachers should first establish the right values. It's not that hard to solve this problem. Teachers can talk to students individually and privately after class, starting with affirming the students' enthusiasm for what they like, such as praising their shoes for being stylish.
Next, find out if the student really likes the shoe and what their parents' attitude is towards the shoe, etc. Then, make it clear that wearing these shoes on the playground is inappropriate and is likely to cause harm.
Wearing these shoes during playtime and gym classes may not be the most convenient option. Consider the risk of possible ankle injuries or shoe damage. If students really like the shoes, they can be advised to wear them during the day, but in school, sneakers are still preferred.
This not only protects the student's self-esteem, but also solves the problem. Instead, students' private affairs are made public, and netizens can comment on them and blame their parents for their choices and personalities.
We often say that teachers should guide students to establish the correct three views. And to do this, first of all, the teacher's three views must be correct. If there is a problem with the teachers themselves, then everything that follows will be empty talk.
Parents should also consider the interests of their students, respect their choices, and let their children have what they like under their own control. The understanding and support of these parents is commendable, but at the same time, there is a need to pay attention to safety.
When it comes to golden Chelsea sneakers, whether they're fashionable or not, there are some real safety concerns associated with using them in sports. Parents may wish to consider a special pair of sneakers for their students, or simply skip the gold Chelsea sneakers to school.
If students have vanity and want to show off, it's also a good idea for parents to let them wear it during breaks, or plan a small party with some good friends to get the shoes recognized.
There are many aspects to a student's emotional needs that can be met, but safety is a factor that must be considered when meeting these needs. Even popular military boots should be used selectively.
Finally, the author would like to emphasize the need for caution when dealing with similar issues. It is not easy to find good teachers, and not all teachers are able to properly deal with the problems that occur around them. In the absence of the truth, it is best to be cautious.
Not everyone is qualified to comment on an issue, especially if the facts are unclear. If teachers approach problems from a subjective point of view, they can have a profound impact on students' worldview. As a teacher, you need to train.
The topic of today's debate is: What do you think of this situation?
The author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author supports any laws, rules, opinions, actions, and is not responsible for the authenticity of the information contained in this article. The author of this article is not responsible for any problems arising from the above content or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal responsibility.