Specialist: It s too early to retire!Employment 35 is too old and 60 is too early to retireDelaying

Mondo Social Updated on 2024-01-31

There is a contradiction between retirement and employment, however, for most people, will China's current policy of delaying retirement really bring benefits?In recent years, the debate of delaying retirement has become more and more intense. Professor Fudan pointed out that according to China's current retirement age and average life expectancy, the retirement age is too early, and he put forward a proposal to postpone it. However, it is worth pondering whether the direct delay is justified.

On average, delaying retirement may not be justified. Because the nature of work and the life span of work vary greatly from occupation to profession. There are some industries where the life expectancy cannot be easily extended.

The complexity of this issue needs to take into account the specificities of different types of work. In this case, whether delaying retirement is fair and reasonable for all is worthy of further consideration and discussion.

Can the professional life expectancy of heavy manual workers and mental work professors be comparable?This does not seem to be the case. Because compared to mental workers such as professors, engaging in heavy physical work is much more damaging to the body, which makes this profession destined to be only engaged in the prime of life, and simply incompetent in old age. In addition, workers who work heavily often carry physical injuries with them, which makes it difficult to solve the problem simply by delaying retirement.

Delaying retirement is also limited by the fact that there is a large difference between the average retirement age and the average life expectancy. In rural areas, for example, there is a significant gap between the average life expectancy of older people and that in urban areas. Therefore, it is too vague and impractical to equate such averages.

Numerical comparisons and suggested data may not be sufficiently comprehensive and rigorous. In China, there are huge differences in the number of people in different regions and occupations, so developing policies that affect everyone needs to be more granular and thoughtful.

In addition, with regard to the retirement age, pensions, and the impact on the employment of young people, I think that the professor's proposal is three concepts that need to be looked at separately. The professor's starting point is good, because it is inevitable that the pressure on pension in our country will increase significantly in the future. In the past, the take-off of China's economy depended on the demographic dividend, and now this group of people who have contributed to the country are entitled to enjoy certain guarantees when they are old.

According to the relevant **, nearly 20 million people in China will reach retirement age every year in the future, constituting a huge group. This trend will continue to grow, but it needs to be carefully considered to try to reduce the pressure on the country and increase the burden on the people by delaying retirement. After all, it is not possible to work for long hours and is thankless, which does not correspond to the reality of our country.

More importantly, do retirees only bring pension pressure to the country?According to relevant data, the rate of labor participation in China is higher than that of many countries. Considering that the future direction of development is to increase consumption, we need to shift from the past labor-based economic model to a more labor-oriented consumption. This requires us to raise the consumption level of more people, rather than leaving everyone at work for a long time and having no time to enjoy life.

Why are so many people opposed?Don't they know that more retirements will put more pressure on them?I think the problem behind it is not just simple work and retirement, but more related to the restructuring of the economy.

Are young people's employment and retirement issues relevant?It's too hard to find a job at 35, and it's too early to retire at 60. In fact, this involves the issue of industrial structure and economic development. Although the two may seem to describe the same issue on the surface, they have different connotations in substance.

First of all, let's ask whether the employment of young people today is really closely related to the retirement of the elderly. I think there's a connection, but it's not very close.

From the perspective of population structure, the number of retirees in China exceeds 20 million every year, and the number of newly employed people is roughly about 15 million. This means that we are facing a labor shortfall, about 5 million people. However, if you make a comparison, South Korea imports a large number of overseas workers every year, despite the word "roll". What is the reason behind this phenomenon?

In fact, with the improvement of the economic level, many young people directly ignore a large number of low-end jobs. This suggests that these jobs do not match the direction of employment of young people, creating a career problem. In addition, the issue of retirement at the age of 60 is not only a problem of economic redistribution in our country, but also a description of one of the two problems. Some would argue that older people occupy many jobs, making it difficult for young people to find opportunities.

However, many more are likely to be targeting professions such as state officials and teachers. There's nothing wrong with that, after all, who wouldn't want to choose a decent and glamorous job?Therefore, the key to the problem lies in the cost performance of the post. It will also require us to rebalance in future economic development. Therefore, we need to seriously consider how to adjust the job structure to better meet the employment needs of young people.

In the past, we have always tended to invest more benefits in the fields of teachers, doctors and doctors, which led to the general development of young people in these directions, and finally formed the phenomenon of public examination fever and postgraduate examination fever.

For most people, the pursuit of better development is a matter of course. This also explains why young people see employment and retirement as one and the same, as they see decent careers as being concentrated in these areas.

Therefore, the fundamental problem in solving the pressure of employment and pension is to rethink the allocation of resources. If those seemingly undignified jobs can also be treated with the respect they deserve, fully protected by the law, and.

And it can bring considerable benefits, so will young people still blindly flock to traditional fields?

Similarly, if the bottom group can still enjoy a significant income after retirement, will they be able to participate more actively in the consumer market and contribute more to the economy?

In general, our past economic structure and model have reached an extreme, and with the economic development and demographic changes, we must reform and adjust. Therefore, the core of the problem lies in economic development and the rational distribution of people's income, that is, wealth.

What are your thoughts on this?Everyone is welcome to leave a message in the comment area**!

Related Pages