The Russian foreign minister's switch to a Huawei mobile phone has sparked heated discussions. Recently, there has been a passage circulating on social media that Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov is no longer holding an Apple mobile phone, but a Huawei mobile phone. The move sparked a heated discussion online. It is understood that Lavrov is holding a Huawei P60 Pro mobile phone, which is a new product released by Huawei in March this year and has been on the European market in May. Is there a deeper meaning behind this mobile phone replacement?
Some analysts pointed out that when Lavrov went to Indonesia to attend the G20 summit last year, the West had hyped up the mobile phone he was wearing and using. At the time, Lavrov was photographed wearing a suspected Apple watch with an Apple phone on his desk. However, he later clarified that he was using a Huawei watch. In Russia, more and more civil servants are being asked to stop using foreign mobile phones such as Apple and turn to domestic smartphones due to information security concerns.
This move was also interpreted as a response to the United States and other Western countries. Due to the influence of some sensitive issues, Russia has begun to scrutinize the equipment of foreign companies such as Apple in the United States to avoid the risk of information leakage. As a result, many Russian public institutions have also begun to ask their staff to stop using Apple phones and switch to other smartphones. Lavrov's switch to a Huawei mobile phone this time is also seen as Russia's response to the rumors of the United States and other Western countries.
In addition to the political implications behind it, Lavrov's choice to use Huawei phones is also reminiscent of the high level of mutual trust between China and Russia. This relationship of trust is not only reflected in politics, but also in action. Russia's long-term use of Huawei mobile phones is not only a riposte to Western countries, but also a recognition and support for Russia's domestic scientific and technological strength. It is also a staunch defense of Russia's autonomy in information security.
In the context of increasingly fierce global technology competition, this move by the Russian foreign minister has undoubtedly given Huawei a shot in the arm. In addition, Lavrov's behavior may have a demonstrative effect on the choice of mobile phones by other country leaders. In the future, with the advent of the 5G era, the choice of mobile phone will not only be a personal preference, but also a symbol of national scientific and technological strength and information security awareness. Such a transformation may become the trend of the future.
The United States has been using "** as an excuse to suppress Huawei and other Chinese technology companies." However, in the eyes of other countries, this is nothing more than a bullying tactic by the United States. Huawei's mobile phone, as a leading achievement, can also meet the needs of the Russian foreign minister. Despite U.S. attempts to suppress China's high-tech development, Huawei's growth has declared the failure of U.S. plans.
More recently, U.S. Commerce Secretary Raimondo's rhetoric has been more like an intimidation of U.S. tech companies, threatening to "act now" if anyone dares to deal with China. And Raimondo "accidentally" became the "spokesperson" of Huawei mobile phones during his visit to China, which not only made Raimondo lose his temper, but also slapped the United States in the face. Now that Huawei is continuing to go overseas, China's technological development is booming.
The "small courtyard and high walls" of the United States will eventually become its own shackles, and in the face of China's development, the United States can only complain. Have you ever wondered if the U.S. crackdown will force Chinese technology companies to innovate more and allow China's technology to develop rapidly?Will Huawei's "far ahead" become the driving force for the development of the United States?It is worth thinking about whether the bullying behavior in the United States is really beneficial to its own development
Perhaps, the United States should pay more attention to its own scientific and technological innovation, rather than constantly trying to suppress technology companies in other countries.