V: I want my children to pursue these three professions, are you talking about it?
The college entrance examination provides an opportunity for some poor students to change their fate, but what really changes their fate may not lie in the exam, but in the individual's thinking, vision and pattern.
How much is the difference between the thinking of the poor and the thinking of the rich?It's just out of the ordinary. Some parents, because of their own cultural constraints, are eager to let their children work in certain professions and expect to change the family's financial situation. However, some professions may not be suitable for people who are less economically off.
The narrowest thinking of the poor is that they are not willing to invest any capital, but they expect to sit back and enjoy it. The harm of this way of thinking cannot be ignored, have you ever had a similar experience?
The poor mindset generally expects children to work in the following three jobs. See if it's in your expectation:
The first choice is state-owned enterprises, because the "iron rice bowl" of state-owned enterprises is what most parents dream of college students. However, some students and parents may not understand how difficult it is to grasp this "iron rice bowl".
In some state-owned enterprises, it is not easy to get in if there are no connections and connections. Even if you succeed in getting in, it will be difficult to get a promotion and a salary increase, because the intricacies of interpersonal relationships are extraordinary.
For those families with poor economic conditions, the average person is usually simple and frugal. However, this kind of personality is not suitable for working in state-owned enterprises.
For families with girls, parents are often willing to send their children to teacher training colleges and universities to become teachers. Even if the child is willing, is the profession of teacher really as "popular" as you think?
Nowadays, there are many misconceptions about the profession of teachers, some people think that teachers have winter and summer vacations, spend time with children every day, and work easily and comfortably. But in fact, the job of a teacher is not easy, with heavy teaching tasks every day, and to become a good teacher, it takes a certain amount of talent, and some abilities cannot be easily acquired through hard work.
Some parents only see that "excellent teachers" live well, but fail to appreciate the hard work behind them, and fail to realize that the salary of ordinary teachers is not so lucrative.
In the end, many parents are hoping that their children will be admitted to the civil service in the future, because they only see the stability of civil service positions and the high salaries of some positions. However, in order to get a high salary, you must have the ability to do so, because high salaries do not come for nothing.
Moreover, not all civil servants can enjoy the desired salary level, and some civil servants have relatively average salaries and are highly competitive, which may not be suitable for every child.
The impact of this kind of thinking on children is far-reaching, and in order to get rid of this mindset, you need to be down-to-earth and realistic.
A common misconception that some people make is that liberal arts are not for the poor. In addition, some students and parents are also prone to problems when applying for volunteers. For example, some families want their children to study the normal profession, so they apply for relevant normal majors, such as Chinese language and literature teacher, history teacher, ideological and political education, etc.
Especially for girls, some families believe that girls are good to become liberal arts teachers and can be respected in the future. However, it is advisable for students from modest families not to choose liberal arts if they want to find a job quickly after graduation and earn a subsidy for their family, as liberal arts are not the first choice for the poor.
This seemingly arbitrary statement is not unreasonable, provided that you have the ambition to do well and not follow the crowd to get your diploma. Because in order to excel in the liberal arts and become a "good teacher", you must have two things:
There is time. You need to have enough time to be able to read books, travel, and do field research. To be a good teacher, you have to be different, and if you are like everyone else, you will not be able to be a good teacher.
Have financial resources. The mention of this may be discouraged by many families, because it is indeed quite difficult to study liberal arts and further education without sufficient financial resources.
Because "there is no first in literature, there is no second in martial arts", what is a talented man and a talented woman?In the case of similar intelligence, talent and understanding, in the end, it depends on who reads more books.
Reading is quite an expensive activity, but is it possible if you aspire to be a great teacher but are not willing to pay the price of reading
For some wealthy families, they may be able to access the archives through personal connections and thus gain first-hand information. Is such an opportunity right for you?
As a result, liberal arts is a discipline that requires a lot of upfront investment. If your family doesn't have the financial resources to support your studies, you may not really want to get involved in the liberal arts easily.
Although the iron rice bowl is good, it may not be suitable for poor families. For those who chase the "iron rice bowl", not only poor families will chase, but even well-off families and wealthy families will compete for it.
So what are the odds of winning the battle for the "iron rice bowl" for poor families?
At the same time, in order to obtain an "iron rice bowl" stably, the requirements for students themselves are also quite high. Poor families often have a rather narrow way of thinking, which is more suitable for them than for exam-oriented education.
The so-called quality education is difficult for poor families to compare with rich families. There is a huge difference in the educational environment in which you are raised. People play with things that may be unheard of by some children from poor families.
The unfairness of the starting line, how can we talk about "don't lose at the starting line"?This in itself is quite a sarcastic statement.
As a result, the mindset of poor families is often focused only on effort, but not on how to work hard. On the surface, he worked hard, but in the fierce competition, he lost again and again.
Why is this so?Because civil servants test comprehensive knowledge, unlike the college entrance examination, which can achieve high scores based on test-taking skills alone.
If you really can't change this way of thinking, then it's best not to touch the "iron rice bowl", because forcing to do something often has little effect, just like a twisted melon is not sweet, and the cow has its own way of bowing its head and drinking water, and you don't need to force it.
Although hard work is very important, if you go in the wrong direction, go in the opposite direction, and waste your youth in the wrong direction, it is better to engage in something that suits you.
So what jobs are suitable for poor families?
Rather than sending urban children to the countryside, it may be more appropriate to let those who have already moved into the city go back to the countryside. Because under normal circumstances, students with average family conditions have the quality of hard work and struggle.
This is a rare quality, and children from urban backgrounds often do not understand what it means to "endure hardship".
Therefore, if the children of these poor families are willing to return to rural or remote areas, this can be a good option.
For example, special post teachers, volunteer teachers, targeted majors, as well as military academies and police academies, etc., are all jobs suitable for children from poor families.
Rural children are not worse than urban children because they are well versed in rural life and choose to work in agriculture-related jobs. Especially when it comes to agronomy, this is a suitable option for families with financial constraints.
In many industries, whether prosperous or declining, solving the problem of food and clothing has always been a major challenge for China. If the agricultural problem is effectively solved, it will not only benefit the individual, but also the country. Therefore, a major like agronomy should be chosen by some children from poor families.
This is not to say that the poor do not have to be satisfied with the status quo, but that most of the poor have difficulty changing their way of thinking. If you succeed in changing your mindset, you can take the civil service exam, work in education, or enter a state-owned enterpriseBut if this reversal of thinking is not possible, it is wiser to choose a career that suits you.
Today's topic is: Do you think these three occupations are suitable for the poor to choose?
The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any of the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.