In fact, the full picture is unknown, and it is difficult for us to evaluate the rights and wrongs of both sides of the incident, but the female executive has put herself and the company in a situation of loss with just one sentence of "I am illegally discharged". How can a place that doesn't even talk about basic legal knowledge treat employees well?
According to upstream news reports, on January 7, a section of "the company's female executives illegally fired employees" sparked heated discussions. In the early morning of January 8, the company involved responded that the former employee Sun did not pass the probation period due to his incompetence and incompetence, and the company handled his resignation in accordance with the law, and at the same time ordered the human resource employee Jing to suspend his job for reflection and serious treatment.
* It shows that the photographer questioned the company's illegal termination of the labor contract, and a woman shouted: "I will terminate it illegally now, can you control my illegality?"I'm just being dismissed illegally, you go sue me!The woman also threatened the photographer: "The first and second instance of labor arbitration, I have people, I will wait for you slowly." I'll make you unable to find a job for two and a half years, and I'll have food next month, figure it out for yourself. ”
The domineering and arrogant attitude of female executives is extremely uncomfortable. In such rights protection disputes, ordinary workers are usually in a disadvantaged position, which is why many resignations have to preserve evidence. Because there is no hard evidence, it is difficult to confront business executives head-on.
In a society governed by the rule of law, it is hard for us to believe that a corporate executive is so unscrupulous, and I don't know where her confidence comes from to shout "I am being released illegally, you can sue me". And the so-called "I will make you unable to find a job for two and a half years" is obviously a threat and has been suspected of violating the law. It is reported that this female executive is an alumnus of Tsinghua University, and even if she is angry, this wild remark is very bad, which not only insults Tsinghua's reputation, but also shows that high education does not mean high quality.
The question is also whether the clamor of female executives is really just angry talkNot necessarily, I'm afraid The company's circle culture prevails, the company has interests with the enterprise, and the executives also have considerable connections in the industry. In film and television dramas, there are often such episodes, where employees offend their superiors, and it is difficult to survive in this industry.
* After the heated discussion, although the company reacted quickly, ordered Jing to suspend for reflection, and said that it would be dealt with seriously, but it did not realize the problem in and out of the words, and showed the maintenance of Jing everywhere. For example, the company's director of product marketing said: "We really didn't handle this well. I can only tell you that this person (Sun) has a very, very big problem. Then he added: "The whole process is quite complicated. It's really just a small piece of the **, and the result is fermented like this. ”
Judging from the content of **, no matter what the cause of the matter is, and no matter how complicated the process is, Jing's "brainless output" as a company executive is a fact and deserves to be condemned by the public, which has no justification for this, and has nothing to do with "this person (Sun) has a very, very big problem". If you think that ** has been dealt with, and the words of the female executive are taken out of context, the company can completely announce the ins and outs of the matter to prove its innocence. With the company's ambiguous attitude and the position of not distinguishing between right and wrong, it is no wonder that such unreasonable executives appear.
This incident reflects the dilemma of workers in protecting their rights. The relationship between the enterprise and the employee is a two-way choice, and the occurrence of labor disputes is a normal thing and should be resolved in a rational way. Negotiations can be conducted through consultation on an equal footing, and if this is not possible, they can also apply for judicial procedures such as labor arbitration. However, from a practical point of view, some enterprises obviously lack this atmosphere of "equal consultation", and present a hierarchical and inferior corporate culture. Employees who are openly threatened to leave by female executives are, to some extent, a representation of the company's image. In fact, we don't know the full picture, and it is difficult for us to evaluate the rights and wrongs of both sides of the incident, but the female executive has already put herself and the company in a situation of losing money with just one sentence of "I am illegally dismissed". How can a place that doesn't even talk about basic legal knowledge treat employees well?