The latest news that Israel and Hamas are about to reach a ceasefire agreement has sparked widespread concern and speculation. The abrupt decision raised questions about the motives and intentions of the Israeli cabinet. Some believe that Israel may have agreed to peace talks because Netanyahu realized that his political losses in the conflict were too great to account for to his citizens and voters. However, a more realistic reason may be that the Israeli army suffered huge losses in this battle.
Expanding: Netanyahu's motives for agreeing to peace talks have sparked widespread discussion. On the one hand, it is thought that he may be aware that his political career will be affected and that he will not be able to account for it to the people and voters. After all, the death toll of women and children in the Israeli army's military operations in Gaza is approaching 10,000, and this tragedy has put tremendous pressure on Israel's international image and the domestic political situation. On the other hand, it has been argued that Netanyahu chose peace talks because the Israeli army suffered heavy losses in the battle, and the number of soldiers killed far exceeded the dozens officially announced. According to circulating reports, Israeli tanks have been repeatedly attacked by Hamas forces during the fighting, and there are even reports that Hamas has broken several Israeli main battle tanks. And the fact that the Israeli army's armed forces were almost destroyed after the Hamas attack on Gaza's last hospital shows that Hamas's tactical tactics are becoming more and more effective.
The Israeli army's operations in the Gaza Strip have been confronted with Hamas's guerrilla tactics, leading to a series of challenges and problems. The Israeli army has implemented a strategy of encircling Gaza, but the dispersion and hiding of the Hamas forces have made it difficult for the Israeli army to quickly destroy the enemy's combat strength to a certain extent. Despite the clear superiority of the Israeli army, they are still unable to completely eliminate Hamas's activities on the battlefield. This makes the operations of the Israeli army difficult and in constant bitter battles.
Expansion: The Israeli army is mired in a difficult but protracted guerrilla war in the fight against Hamas. The Hamas forces have adopted the tactics of dispersing and hiding, making it difficult for the Israeli army to concentrate on annihilating the enemy's combat strength. Although the Israeli army has obvious advantages in equipment and tactics, Hamas, as a guerrilla organization, constantly changes positions and uses concealed bunkers to carry out attacks, which has caused great trouble for the Israeli army. In addition, the Hamas armed forces have also skillfully used RPGs and other ** to effectively destroy Israeli tanks. As a result, the Israeli army's scope of control is limited, and it is impossible to quickly achieve comprehensive control of the battlefield. Although the Israeli army has made some progress in its strategy of encircling Gaza, Hamas's guerrilla tactics have made the Israeli army's operations difficult and arduous.
In addition to the battlefield in the Gaza Strip, Israel has faced attacks from Allah in Lebanon, and the rear command has been dealt a serious blow. Lebanese Allah announced that it had fired four heavy rockets at the headquarters of the 91st Division of the Israel Defense Forces, all of which hit the target. This strike caused serious damage to the rear command and supply system of the Israeli army, and further reduced the combat effectiveness of the Israeli army.
In addition to being attacked by Hamas guerrilla attacks on the battlefields in the Gaza Strip, Israel also faces threats from other hostile groups. Allah Lebanon launched a powerful attack on the headquarters of the 91st Division of the Israel Defense Forces, striking at the rear command and supply systems of the Israeli army. According to reports, four heavy rockets hit targets at the Israeli command, causing serious damage and losses. This attack seriously disrupted the operation of the Israeli army's logistical supply and command system, and had a non-negligible impact on the Israeli army's combat effectiveness and combat effectiveness.
Israel has long been a military power in the Middle East. However, as countries across the globe develop and progress, Israel faces more and more challenges. Israel is dependent on U.S. support and military assistance, but in recent years, the U.S. has seen a gradual decline in its international influence and military power, which has also affected Israel's status and strength. At the same time, Arab and Islamic countries are gradually overtaking Israel in military power, and Israel's dominance in the region is increasingly being challenged.
Expansion: As a military power in the Middle East, Israel has long relied on the support and assistance of the United States to maintain a certain advantage in the region. However, with the development and progress of countries around the world, as well as the gradual increase in the military power of other countries in the region, Israel's dominance in the region has begun to be challenged. In particular, the gradual decline of the United States' status as a global superpower has also affected its international influence and military strength, further exacerbating Israel's geostrategic pressure. At the same time, the improvement of military technology and strength of Arab and Islamic countries has made the military gap between them and Israel smaller and smaller. Israel's military strength and regional dominance are being severely challenged and tested.
Israel's sudden agreement to peace talks may indicate that there are deeper reasons and considerations behind this conflict. As can be seen from the losses suffered by the Israeli army during its operations in Gaza and the Lebanese Allah attacks in the rear, Israel faces internal and external challenges and threats, and its military power and geopolitical position are no longer as superior to other countries as before. Israel** may have chosen peace talks with Hamas because it may have realized that the ongoing conflict would only further weaken the country's strength and position. However, the peace talks do not mean that Israel is not responsible for the civilian deaths that have occurred in Gaza. At the same time, Israel** must also shoulder its responsibilities to respond to the international community's investigation and accountability for its actions, and to give a satisfactory account to those innocent dead and to the people of the world.