Why did Stalin sacrifice his own son?

Mondo History Updated on 2024-01-28

The real world of flies and dogs, and the depth of Western civilization, make many people today underestimate the purity of communist idealists.

The use of public power for their own personal gain was the standard for the communist fighters of that generation, the sons of peasants could die in battle, the sons of workers could die in battle, and the sons of Stalin could of course also die in battle. Stalin's choice could not have been more normal. The Communists of that generation were full of thoughts about liberating all mankind and planting the red flag all over the world, and private affairs must be subordinated to this great goal.

When the situation requires it, not only his son can be sacrificed, but also himself. Without the spirit of sacrifice, what kind of international communist movement is there to engage in?Only selflessness can unite more toiling masses to go forward for the great ideal under the attack of capitalist sugar-coated shells. Only pure loyalty can overcome the concept of "selfishness" that naturally exists in everyone's heart. Otherwise, your son will not be up, my son will not be up, so whose son will be up?

At least during the period of vigorous development, the international communist movement was not a **, but there were really countless idealists who willingly fought for it, even at the cost of their own. Among them was Stalin.

Many people say that Stalin killed countless people, many people say that Stalin's policies are extreme, and many people say that Stalin is brutal, but there is one thing that no one can discredit: Stalin only has public grudges, no personal vendettas, and he never seeks any personal interests for himself and his family.

After Stalin's death, the Soviet Union set up a special liquidation team to turn Stalin's family upside down to find out how much he had an inheritance. In the end, it was found out that Stalin's passbook had only 900 rubles, which was almost a month's salary of an ordinary Soviet worker. He didn't have many fancy clothes in his closet, only a dozen or so, all of them in military uniforms, white shirts, and 5 hats.

The five villas he lived in before his death were handed over to the Soviet Union and were not left to his children, and none of his descendants were in the office. Stalin always wore this kind of clothing.

Of course, this is not because Stalin is special, but because the communists of that generation are like this. They even said that they didn't think it was something to boast about, but took it for granted.

It is precisely the purity of this group of idealists that makes the frenzy of the international communist movement so earth-shaking and so terrifying to the capitalists. If you can buy them and corrupt them with selfish interests, then the capitalists are too happy, and the capitalists are absolutely capable of offering a sky-high price that the selfish cannot refuse.

Today, many people have abandoned the ideals of communism, but there are still many, many people who are sticking to their ideals.

For example, the winner of the "July 1st Medal", Zhang Guimei, a teacher who has been sticking to the mountains for decades;

For example, academician Lin Junde, the pioneer of "two bombs and one star" who still insisted on working a few hours before his death;

For example, Professor Yuan Longping, who has been walking in the field for decades to study hybrid rice;These people are the backbone of human civilization to a better tomorrow

These are the unquenched flame of the international communist movementIn the end, it must be the idealists who bury capitalism, and finally bury the injustices of the world.

In today's world, Western values led by the United States are rampant and hegemonic, and almost all anti-American regimes, the West will try all kinds of ways to smear their private morality, saying that they are unscrupulous, extravagant, extravagant and wasteful, and disregard for the people's livelihood.

The most recent example is Hamas, Putin's yacht, and Gaddafi's beautiful bodyguards.

This is all part of the political offensive of the West, and no one knows what the real situation really is.

I will mention only one point: if they are really hedonists, is it necessary for these countries to oppose the West under such pressure?Isn't it better to turn to the West as a comprador to one's personal life?World strife

Related Pages