One of the most obvious drawbacks of the "two ladders, four households" design is:Privacy ProtectionInsufficient. There are only four homes on each floor, and residents share a smaller floor space, resulting in a violation of privacy between residents. For example, the sound between neighbors is easy to transmit, even on a daily basislifeSome details may be noticed by neighbors. The density of this living mode makes the comfort and privacy of living affected to a certain extent, which makes people feel inconvenient. A range of social activities such as neighbours interacting with each other, saying thank you, and caring for each other are also restricted, as residents may want to keep their own private space.
In practicelife, this defect can cause more problems. For example, owners in rooms close to elevator halls may experience more noise and distractions, disturbed by the family activities of nearby residents. At the same time, the interaction and communication between residents has also been restricted, and the connection and mutual assistance within the community have become less close. In this environment, people's expectations of comfort and privacy in their living spaces cannot be met, causing inconvenience and even anxiety to residents.
Another issue with the "two ladders and four households" design is safety. Due to the high density of residents on the floors, it will be more difficult to evacuate residents in the event of an emergency such as a fire. When people are crowded, evacuation routes can be blocked, increasing the risk of fire accidents. In addition, when danger occurs, it may be difficult for people to respond calmly due to panic, further exacerbating the safety problem. In addition, there are more entrances and exits for each unit, which are also given to the communitySecurity managementBrings challenges. For example, issues such as theft prevention and controlling the entry and exit of strangers have become more complex and require more rigorous prevention and management measures.
In practice, the safety issues posed by this design have been verified in some places. There have been serious fire accidents in the local area due to the inability to evacuate quickly, which has made people more aware and worried about the safety hazards of this design. For this reason, the number of dwellers per floor has been limited in the building design regulations of some countries, such as Japan, to improve the safety and security of residents.
The third problem in the design of "two ladders and four households" is:Public spacesdeficiencies. In order to ensure that each resident has enough living space, common areas such as corridors and elevator halls are often relatively small. This not only affects the comfort of living, but can also cause congestion in daily use, such as waiting and crowding when using elevators during peak hours.
In actual residence, people often need to use itPublic spaces, such as rest areas, reception areas, aisles, etc. However, due to the limitations of this design, the area of the common area may be significantly reduced. This means that residents are usingPublic spacesIt may feel cramped and crowded, which will affect the comfort of living. Especially when there are many residents, the use of common areas can become very inconvenient, such as waiting and crowding when using elevators during peak hours.
In the design of "two elevators and four households", the maintenance cost increases relatively due to the high frequency of use of elevators. As the core element of this design, the elevator must be maintained and repaired frequently to ensure its normal operation and safe use. However, due to the large number of residents, the maintenance of public facilities (such as corridor lighting, cleaning, etc.) is also greater, which indirectly increases the property cost of the owner.
In practicelifeThis is also the objection of many residents to the design of "two ladders and four households".EconomyHaunt. The increase in strata fees makes the property ownersEconomyThe burden is heavier, and this increase in costs is continuous, compared to buying a two-story house with one family is more cost-effective. As a result, many old owners are dissatisfied and complain about the increase in maintenance costs.
To sum up, the design of "two stairs and four households" ignores the living experience and needs of residents while meeting the efficiency of building use. With the improvement of people's requirements for living quality, the shortcomings of this design have been gradually magnified, which has triggered more and more people's reflection and rejection. Privacy ProtectionDeficiencies, security issues,Public spacesInadequacy and high maintenance costs are the four main complaints from owners about the design. The future of residential design needs to take more into account the comfort of livingPrivacy Protection, safety and sustainability to meet the needs of modern people for a high-quality living environment.
In short, the residential design is:SocialProgress and the components of people's well-being, it must not only cater to people who are practical andEconomySexual needs should also take care of people's spiritual and emotional needs. We hope that the future residential design can be more humane and human-oriented, providing people with a comfortable, safe, and safe environmentPrivacy ProtectionGood, good living environment. Only in this way can people truly enjoy the warmth and happiness of home.