As we all know, the feudal dynasty in Chinese history began with the establishment of the Qin Dynasty and ended the centuries-long turmoil and turmoil in the Central Plains. However, with the death of Qin Shi Huang and the succession of Qin II, the tyranny of the Qin dynasty became increasingly unbearable, triggering a wave of unbearable revolt among the people. In this anti-Qin storm, two of the most famous figures in history emerged: Liu Bang, the king of Han, and Xiang Yu, the overlord. They are all dragon and phoenix heroes, and they have made outstanding contributions to the fall of the Qin Dynasty.
After the fall of the Qin Dynasty, Liu Bang and Xiang Yu began to compete for world dominance. Although Xiang Yu's background and strength are inferior to Xiang Yu, the world ultimately belongs to Liu Bang. The mystery of this actually stems from the fact that Liu Bang has a lot of talents, far better than Xiang Yu.
This raises the question: why did all the talents eventually gather to Liu Bang instead of Xiang Yu?According to the "Historical Records", Xiang Yu cared for his soldiers and treated them with great kindness, even visiting the wounded soldiers in person and eating and drinking with them. However, why did his subordinates defect to Liu Bang?
Stingy with grace. 
Xiang Yu showed extreme stinginess and was reluctant to reward soldiers who had made meritorious contributions. Han Xin once complained to Liu Bang about Xiang Yu's stinginess: "King Xiang is respectful and loving on the surface, and his words are gentle, but when the soldiers deserve to be knighted for their merits, he refuses to reward them, and even does not grant them the official seal that should be given." This kindness is simply the work of women. ”
Xiang Yu asked his soldiers to sacrifice their lives on the battlefield, but he refused to honor the promotion and reward he deserved. This kind of behavior made talent unbearable, and turned to Liu Bang.
Cronyism. In addition to being stingy, another fatal flaw of Xiang Yu is cronyism. He only trusted the nobles of the Chu State who were from the same background as himself, and was dismissive of other defectors. Most of the ministers around him were relatives and friends, and official positions were divided according to blood relations, which made it impossible for later talents to obtain high positions.
At the Hongmen Banquet, Fan Zeng attempted to assassinate Liu Bang, but was stopped by Xiang Yu's uncle Xiang Bo. This cronyism deprived Xiang Yu of a good opportunity, and in the end Liu Bang was able to recuperate, develop and grow his power, and finally defeat Xiang Yu.
Stubborn as a mule. 
In addition to the above drawbacks, Xiang Yu is also suspected of being stubborn and self-serving. He thinks highly of himself and dismisses the people who come to him. For example, Han Xin once defected to Xiang Yu, but was humiliated and despised, and finally switched to Liu Bang, led his troops to fight back, causing Xiang Yu to collapse into an army, embattled, and finally kill himself.
Xiang Yu was also superstitious about his own strength, despised Liu Bang, and even let go of Liu Bang, the enemy of life and death, and was finally counterattacked by Liu Bang and killed himself.
Epilogue. Although Xiang Yu was heroic, he made fatal mistakes in stinginess, cronyism, and self-righteousness, which led to the departure of talents and the eventual destruction of his future. In contrast, although Liu Bang was from a poor background, he knew how to treat people with kindness and was not confined to blood, and finally achieved great things.
This historical story is a wake-up call that stinginess, cronyism, and self-serving are fatal weaknesses in leadership. Only leaders who know how to cherish talents, do not favor relatives and friends, and are cautious for their own use can be invincible.
Xiang Yu and Liu Bang, two legendary figures in ancient Chinese history, have left behind their stories and leadership styles, which have become the objects of research and reflection for future generations. In this article, Xiang Yu and Liu Bang's power schemes, talent attraction, and leadership styles are analyzed in depth, which triggers my reflections and comments on these two historical figures.
First of all, Xiang Yu's stinginess and cronyism brought him fatal drawbacks. Despite his prodigious military courage and leadership, his excessive stinginess led to the departure of his men and the inability to retain their hearts. He favored relatives and friends excessively, and assigned official positions according to blood relations, which limited the emergence and development of talents, and eventually led to strategic mistakes and eventual downfall. This kind of behavior is worth pondering, and leaders should learn to treat each member fairly and impartially when managing the team, and not favor each member because of personal or blood ties, in order to attract more excellent talents.
On the contrary, Liu Bang showed a different side from Xiang Yu in terms of leadership style. Despite his humble background, he was good at showing kindness, appreciating and rewarding the talents under his command, regardless of blood ties, and giving everyone a fair chance. This open and inclusive leadership style has enabled him to attract more outstanding talents, strengthen his own power, and ultimately achieve the world. From Liu Bang, we can see that an excellent leader needs to have a vision, be good at discovering and cultivating talents, and should not be bound by tradition or identity.
In addition, the stubbornness mentioned in the article is also the Achilles' heel that leaders need to avoid. Xiang Yu was overconfident in his own strength and let go of Liu Bang's potential threat, which eventually led to his own defeat. This reminds leaders to be humble, prudent, and constantly alert to their blind spots and misjudgments, so as to avoid overconfidence and failure.
In general, from the historical stories of Xiang Yu and Liu Bang, we can draw leadership wisdom and lessons. Stinginess, cronyism, and self-servicing are Achilles' heels that leaders need to be wary of and avoid. A good leader should be gracious, fair and equitable to team members, and attract talent with an open and inclusive mindset, while remaining humble and prudent, and constantly improving their leadership skills and judgment. These qualities are what make a leader invincible in the ever-changing course of history.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!