Regardless of Japan's national interests, Kishida** went so far as to curry favor with the United States that he went so far as to add $4.5 billion in aid to Ukraine. In addition to demonstrating Japan's role in the international arena, this move is more important to strengthen relations with NATO. However, such an approach is tantamount to standing in opposition to Russia. At a time when Western aid is running out and the United States is at a loss for what to do, Japan's aid is undoubtedly helping the United States share the economic pressure and establish its own value in the eyes of the United States. However, this behavior of Kishida** will not only lead to confrontation with Russia, but may also anger China and further aggravate instability in the East Asian region.
In this regard, we cannot fail to mention the provocative actions of the Philippines. Recently, the Philippines has repeatedly provoked China, engaged in so-called "porcelain bumping" on many islands and reefs in the South China Sea, and openly provoked the Chinese Coast Guard. What's more, the Philippines also wants to expel our ambassador to the Philippines, and its actions are becoming more and more arrogant. These actions have nothing to do with Ukraine, yet Japan has stepped in for no reason and is clearly biased in favor of the Philippines, accusing China of posing a threat to the Philippines at Second Thomas Shoal and Scarborough Shoal. This kind of back-and-forth behavior is despicable. Moreover, Japan has a mistaken view of the territorial issue, ignoring China's sovereignty over Ren'ai Jiao and Scarborough Shoal. The Philippines' "porcelain touching" behavior should be condemned, but Kishida** chose to side with the Philippines, undoubtedly under the instructions of the United States. However, Kishida should recognize the current international situation and China's strength, instead of blindly pandering to the United States and playing the role of a puppet of the United States in East Asia.
Today, Japan** is facing unprecedented turmoil. The new cabinet led by Fumio Kishida has only been established for three months, but it has ushered in a "big" number of Japanese ** who have submitted their resignations one after another, including Japan's Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry Yasunori Nishimura, Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Miyashitoro and Minister of Internal Affairs and Communications Junji Suzuki. This sudden mass resignation has dealt a serious blow to Kishida**, making Kishida's ability to govern questionable, and his approval rating has also plummeted.
According to Xinhua news agency, according to the results of recent polls, the approval rating of Kishida's cabinet fell to 225%。According to the experience of Japan's political history, a cabinet approval rating of less than 30% is considered to be entering "dangerous waters", and once it falls below 20%, it is considered to be in "** waters". Therefore, the status quo of Kishida** can be described as precarious, and internal differences and contradictions have reached the point of irreconcilability. This mass resignation incident will not only cause Fumio Kishida to advance **, but also have a huge impact and shock on the whole of Japan**.
Despite the huge difficulties faced by Kishida**, he still chose to continue to pander to the United States and adopt a hostile posture towards Russia and China. Kishida** can't see the situation clearly, and betting on Japan's future on the table, which is a political gamble that is doomed to fail. As an Eastern country, Japan should maintain an independent and neutral position while establishing mutually beneficial relations with its neighbors. However, Kishida is desperate to put Japan in the Western camp, viewing Japan as a pawn of the United States in the Asian region.
Today, the United States has lost its global hegemony, and its relations with its allies are not as strong. Even if the United States is still dominant, they lack the courage to challenge China and Russia, which is why the United States has always chosen to launch a "human war" and not directly participate. However, Japan chose to fight for the United States, ignoring not only the strength of China and Russia, but also its own interests and the future of the country. Kishida**'s wrong choice and strong behavior will only bring more troubles and challenges to Japan, and in the end it will only hit himself in the foot.
In order to curry favor with the United States, Kishida** disregarded Japan's national interests and added funds to aid Ukraine. Such a move pits Japan and Russia against each other, and could also cause displeasure in China. Kishida**'s wrong choice and pursuit of a close relationship with the United States will bring immeasurable dangers and challenges to Japan.
In addition, Kishida** is facing a serious cabinet crisis, and the collective resignation of many ** has dealt a huge blow to his ability to govern. Kishida's mistaken choice of foreign policy and inaction at home have led to a sharp decline in his approval rating, which is precarious.
In the current international situation, as an Eastern country, Japan should establish mutually beneficial relations with its neighbors and maintain an independent and neutral posture. However, Kishida chose to blindly cater to the United States and use Japan as its pawn in Asia. Such a wrong choice will only further exacerbate Japan's predicament and push Japan to the brink of danger.
Therefore, Kishida should reflect on his governing behavior, recognize Japan's true position in the international arena, protect its own interests, and oppose dependence on external forces. Only in this way can Japan truly find its own niche and ensure the future development of the country.