Manuscript rejection and rework often occur during the publication process of SCI**. In general, it is rare for editors to accept manuscripts directly, and most manuscripts need to be re-reviewed after major or minor repairs during the review process, and the number of rejections also increases with the number of manuscripts increasing year by year. So, how to deal with the situation of sci** rejection?
To deal with the problem of SCI rejection, it is necessary to adopt appropriate countermeasures according to the reasons. The reasons for the rejection of the SCI manuscript are none other than the following:
1. **No new ideas.
International journals welcome original work. Experimental arguments that repeat someone else's published literature, or can be inferred from known international literature after simple reasoning, or duplicate someone else's work will be rejected.
2. The summary and analysis are not in place.
There are new discoveries, but they fail to refine and sublimate well and rise to the height of theory. There is only a purely qualitative description, and there is a lack of quantitative and theoretical analysis.
3. The content is not weighty enough.
Different journals have different requirements for the first content, and some journals only accept manuscripts with sufficient quality and in line with the journal field, and the quality of the content or research results will naturally be rejected if the quality of the content or research results does not meet the requirements.
4. Insufficient argumentation.
*The arguments presented cannot be substantiated by this protocol. There is a problem with logical reasoning and a lack of experimental methodological theory. The authors failed to impartially and objectively extrapolate conclusions from the results of their experiments.
5. The experiment is not perfect.
Flaws in data analysis or statistics. For example, the amount of experimental data is small, the experimental conditions are not easy to control, no control group is set up, and the test methods or statistical methods are incorrect.
6. Exaggerating one's own contributions.
SCI requires authors to write a statement of author's contribution, and if SCI is exaggerated by other means and debunked, it will have a great impact on their future academic career.
7. There is a problem with the language description.
Some common problems, such as too many English grammar errors, improper expressions, incoherent sentences, poor writing skills, etc., reviewers will naturally reject the manuscript if they do not understand it.
8. It does not meet the requirements of the magazine.
This is rarely the case with author submissions. The reasons for this are mostly due to unclear **, incomplete illustrations, incorrect reference formatting, etc.
Resolution on the rejection of SCI manuscripts.
There are different ways to deal with the rejection of SCI** depending on the reason for the rejection. If the manuscript is rejected and rewritten due to errors in the content, the author needs to carefully revise the manuscript and submit it again. If SCI** is rejected because it is not important or innovative enough, the author can send it to another academic journal with a low impact factor after carefully considering the reviewer's comments and carefully revising the manuscript.
There are two types of rejection cases in which an editor rejects a manuscript completely: a partial rejection. The first category is also largely modified to no avail, while the second category is due to the inclusion of certain useful data and information, but the content is flawed. Such authors may wish to put it aside until they find a wider range of evidence to support it or have a clearer conclusion, and then send the revised "new" ** to the journal.
When a reviewer sends back a revised draft, it needs to be carefully analyzed and revised accordingly**. If you think that your opinion is incorrect, you should answer it with extreme caution and seriousness, and talk to the reviewer with reason. Publication of sci**