University teachers are no longer an opportunity to take the postgraduate examination, and it is not recommended that ordinary students from secondary colleges and universities take the postgraduate examination
As a university teacher, I used to encourage many students to go to graduate school, but in recent years, the changes in graduate school have made me re-examine the value for money. I think that the current cost-effective entrance examination is relatively low.
In short, I don't recommend students from ordinary secondary universities to go to graduate school, unless they are students who perform extremely well in all aspects.
Unlike the gaokao, which only has a written test, and all candidates take the same test method. However, the postgraduate entrance examination involves interviews, and there are big differences between each school and each major.
The college entrance examination may be an opportunity for many people, but for ordinary students from secondary universities, the postgraduate entrance examination is no longer an opportunity.
A lot of self-a** are still encouraging graduate school admissions, but we should look at their motivations. Their rhetoric sounds good, full of praise and inspiration, but in the end they may just be selling their own products. We need to keep our eyes open and not be fooled by rhetoric. Dreams are important, but things that are too low are not worth discussing.
Unlike the college entrance examination, the gold content of the postgraduate entrance examination seems to be getting lower and lower, but it is becoming more and more difficult. This year's graduate school entrance examination has a huge number of applicants, and schools can make various rules to protect their interests. It is normal and necessary that there are differences in the graduate school entrance examination, but this year's differences are extremely significant. Each school has unique characteristics, and it becomes very difficult for outsiders or candidates who lack experience from previous years to obtain accurate information.
I hope that readers reading this will understand the shift in my perspective. The path to graduate school is not for everyone, and it needs to be carefully weighed.
Some candidates only found out that the subjects of this year's examination have changed dramatically before registering, and one exam has changed from one in the past to four. She hurriedly intensified her studies in the remaining three subjects, but her grades were not satisfactory and she finally failed to make it to the interview session. Many people may think that this is fair, as the vast majority of candidates are unaware of this adjustment. However, most people are actually familiar with the news.
So does this candidate understand?In fact, she was in the know, and the news was rumored two or three years ago, but she couldn't figure out whether the news was true. Who is more likely to know if this information is accurate?It is clear that people with strong access to information have access to information and are sensitive to it. This poses an insurmountable obstacle for the second student. For some, just one ** will solve this problem.
So why is the ability to obtain information weak?Maybe it's because you don't have the awareness of this, or because you don't have this circle of information. Although you can consult on the Internet and ask your brothers and sisters for advice, these shallow information channels are not very meaningful. You don't have easy access to real information, and rightfully so.
The graduate school entrance examination is no longer an era where you can get good grades simply by studying hard. Just like the evolution of the ancient handicraft workshop compared to the modern industrial production line, the postgraduate entrance examination is undergoing a process of refinement and specialization.
Imagine that the public course training for postgraduate entrance examination is like a highly specialized production line, and every knowledge point is accurately analyzed and professionally trained, with the aim of ensuring that every candidate can stand out in the postgraduate examination.
In this context, it seems that student individualization differences become less critical, and instead it is about who can execute this learning process better. For students from the second university, the challenge is not only the subject knowledge itself, but also how to effectively connect with this highly specialized system.
What is remarkable is that with the trend of specialization in postgraduate entrance examinations, high-scoring candidates have sprung up, and even candidates with more than 400 points abound. This makes it even more difficult for those who are relatively disadvantaged to cope with the situation.
We are often told that we can achieve great results with hard work. However, for these disadvantaged students, no matter how hard they put in, it is difficult for them to compete with those who have good study habits and guidance.
To stand out in the competition for graduate school entrance examinations, you not only need to work hard, but also need to find a study method and strategy that suits you. For students who are unaware of this or lack guidance, they may still be struggling blindly to achieve their desired grades.
The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any of the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.